llm-ingestion-okf/docs
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 6e0a7c015a docs(okf-v0.2): D4 shipped, and the leaning §14 overruled
Three plan statements the session's work overtook:

- D4 records what shipped, including the part deliberately left undone
  (reading §10's block form) and the invariant that falls out of it.
- V6's "our leaning, for them to accept or overrule" is superseded:
  refuse became import-and-report. The leaning had a problem the prose
  could not see — §14 forbids rejecting a bundle over a broken
  cross-link and does not settle whether `executor.resource` is one,
  while §10.5 asks a consumer to surface. Reporting honours the
  unambiguous rule without testing the ambiguous one.
- What stays with the guard is restated rather than assumed closed:
  whether a non-`.md` code file is within `okf.import_bundle`'s mandate
  is untouched by this, and the execution boundary still has no owner.

Also recorded: the report is key-level because the resource-level value
is the one the parser cannot recover in either canonical form. A
measured limit, not a preference.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKKMwi7e7PVHoFW6dJK5XP
2026-07-31 21:45:51 +02:00
..
plan docs(okf-v0.2): D4 shipped, and the leaning §14 overruled 2026-07-31 21:45:51 +02:00
phase-3-split-table.md feat(phase-3): the index policy becomes configurable, with the reader that judges it 2026-07-25 20:30:54 +02:00
upstream-okf-upgrade-runbook.md docs(okf-v0.2): V-A8 executed green, and the two premises it falsified 2026-07-31 21:12:52 +02:00