Three plan statements the session's work overtook: - D4 records what shipped, including the part deliberately left undone (reading §10's block form) and the invariant that falls out of it. - V6's "our leaning, for them to accept or overrule" is superseded: refuse became import-and-report. The leaning had a problem the prose could not see — §14 forbids rejecting a bundle over a broken cross-link and does not settle whether `executor.resource` is one, while §10.5 asks a consumer to surface. Reporting honours the unambiguous rule without testing the ambiguous one. - What stays with the guard is restated rather than assumed closed: whether a non-`.md` code file is within `okf.import_bundle`'s mandate is untouched by this, and the execution boundary still has no owner. Also recorded: the report is key-level because the resource-level value is the one the parser cannot recover in either canonical form. A measured limit, not a preference. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKKMwi7e7PVHoFW6dJK5XP |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| plan | ||
| phase-3-split-table.md | ||
| upstream-okf-upgrade-runbook.md | ||