C6. `docs/consumption-contract.md` now says what the pre-pass emits:
- SS 2.5 point 2: sub-questions are written in the bundle's terms and given to
the pre-pass in ONE run where it takes several;
- SS 8's example is `okf-consumption/2` as shipped: `withheld` is the
`{total, by_rule, nearest, complete}` mapping, `coverage` carries
`absent_terms` and `weak`, an excerpt carries `text`, `text_sha256`,
`passage` and `own_title`; point 1 closes the identity on `withheld.total`;
- point 7 keeps the falsified verdicts on record and states the one reading
carried since v1.1, `weak`, with its rule: a word held in no form, or
nothing delivered -- whether a word exists at all, which does not move with
question style or corpus size the way the two shares did;
- point 8 the passage (`{start, end, of}`, `text_sha256` over the passage,
`sha256` still the file's), point 9 several sub-questions in one run (one
cut, `questions`, `subquestions`, per-sub-question coverage), point 10 a
title inherited from the heading above, with `own_title`;
- SS 10 names this library's default ranking (BM25) and `--ranking fusion`.
`okf check` holds the two new forms a reader acts on: `passage_malformed`
(not whole numbers with 0 <= start < end <= of) and `subquestions_unindexed`
(not distinct indices into `questions`, or indices in a payload listing none).
17 -> 19 rules; the two tests that pin the published count move with it.
Each rule is held against a real payload (0 findings) and against that
payload broken six ways.
Editing the contract moved the SS 7.4 known-positive, measured once after the
edit: 19 837 -> 23 672 encoded, 19 358 -> 23 092 raw, delta 479 -> 580. The
example payload and `skills/okf-consume` are regenerated by the published
recipe and `okf check` reports 19 rules, 0 findings on them.
Suite on a clean tree after `git add`: 2443 passed, 2 skipped, 4 xfailed.
ruff, ruff format, mypy --strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
977040f575