llm-ingestion-okf/tests/test_adjudicate.py

"""The adjudication command: it records a judgement, and never invents one.

A proposal a human has not looked at must never be replayable as an
adjudication, because replay is exactly what the run path does with a plan --
deterministically and forever. So this command writes a SIBLING record and
leaves the proposal untouched: the two files together say who judged what,
when, and how long it took, and either can be re-read against the other.

Three properties are pinned here rather than described:

- **The model leg is OFF by default.** Pre-annotation has been measured
  LOWERING a good annotator's accuracy, from 98.1 % to 95.8 %, so a leg that
  cannot be switched off is a leg whose value can never be measured. With it
  off, no process is spawned at all -- asserted by breaking `subprocess.run`.
- **The CLI is named, and the other one is excluded BY NAME.** The model leg
  shells out to the `claude` CLI. `gemini` is not merely unmentioned; its
  absence from the module is a test, because "we did not use it" and "nothing
  stops us using it" look identical in a review.
- **Dwell time travels with the verdict** (PM decision B2). A ratified flag
  with no per-item time is unfalsifiable, and it is the same number that makes
  adjudication throughput measurable at all.

It lives outside `src/`, so it never enters a wheel and no consumer's install
surface changes because it exists.
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import json
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any

import pytest

from llm_ingestion_okf.errors import SegmentationError
from llm_ingestion_okf.segmentation import parse_segmentation_plan

sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "tools"))

import okf_adjudicate  # noqa: E402
import okf_propose_segments  # noqa: E402

DOCUMENT = """# N500 Vegbygging

Innledende tekst om vegbygging og dens omfang.

## 3.1 Brannkonsept

Krav til seksjonering av bygget.

## 3.2 Roemning

To uavhengige roemningsveier.
"""

ADJUDICATOR = "ktg"
AT = "2026-09-02T10:00:00Z"


def proposal(tmp_path: Path) -> Path:
    source = tmp_path / "n500.md"
    source.write_text(DOCUMENT, encoding="utf-8", newline="")
    out = tmp_path / "plan.json"
    assert okf_propose_segments.main([str(source), "--out", str(out), "--proposed-at", AT]) == 0
    return out


def adjudicate(tmp_path: Path, *extra: str) -> tuple[int, Path]:
    verdict = tmp_path / "adjudicated.json"
    code = okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(proposal(tmp_path)),
            "--out",
            str(verdict),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
            *extra,
        ]
    )
    return code, verdict


def payload(path: Path) -> dict[str, Any]:
    return json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))


def test_the_proposal_survives_untouched(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    plan_path = proposal(tmp_path)
    before = plan_path.read_bytes()
    okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(plan_path),
            "--out",
            str(tmp_path / "adjudicated.json"),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
        ]
    )
    assert plan_path.read_bytes() == before


def test_the_verdict_records_adjudicator_timestamp_and_dwell(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    code, verdict = adjudicate(tmp_path)
    assert code == 0
    written = payload(verdict)
    assert written["adjudicated"] is True
    for entry in written["entries"]:
        record = entry["adjudication"]
        assert record["adjudicated_by"] == ADJUDICATOR
        assert record["adjudicated_at"] == AT
        assert isinstance(record["adjudication_dwell_s"], int)
        assert not isinstance(record["adjudication_dwell_s"], bool)


def test_the_verdict_parses_as_a_segmentation_plan(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    _, verdict = adjudicate(tmp_path)
    parsed = parse_segmentation_plan(payload(verdict))
    assert parsed.adjudicated is True
    assert all(entry.adjudication is not None for entry in parsed.entries)


def test_replaying_the_same_verdict_produces_identical_bytes(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    """K4a's mechanism: an adjudication is data, so a re-run is a copy."""
    _, first = adjudicate(tmp_path)
    kept = first.read_bytes()
    second = tmp_path / "again.json"
    okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(tmp_path / "plan.json"),
            "--out",
            str(second),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
        ]
    )
    assert second.read_bytes() == kept


def test_with_the_model_leg_off_no_process_is_spawned(
    tmp_path: Path, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
) -> None:
    """Asserted by BREAKING the spawn, not by reading the code.

    A test that merely inspects the default would pass just as happily if the
    default were ignored.
    """

    def refuse(*args: object, **kwargs: object) -> None:
        raise AssertionError("the model leg spawned a process while switched off")

    monkeypatch.setattr(subprocess, "run", refuse)
    code, _ = adjudicate(tmp_path)
    assert code == 0


def test_the_model_leg_is_off_unless_asked_for(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    assert (
        okf_adjudicate.parse_args(
            ["--plan", "p", "--out", "o", "--adjudicator", "a", "--adjudicated-at", AT]
        ).model
        is None
    )


def test_the_resolved_argv_starts_with_the_claude_binary() -> None:
    argv = okf_adjudicate.model_argv("claude-opus-5", "spoersmaal")
    assert argv[0] == okf_adjudicate.CLAUDE_CLI
    assert Path(argv[0]).name == "claude"
    assert "--model" in argv
    assert argv[argv.index("--model") + 1] == "claude-opus-5"


def test_the_other_cli_is_excluded_by_name_not_merely_unused() -> None:
    """ "We did not use it" and "nothing stops us using it" look identical in a
    review. This is the difference, as a measurement."""
    module = Path(okf_adjudicate.__file__).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
    assert "gemini" not in module.lower()


def test_the_gemini_check_can_actually_fire() -> None:
    """The negative control for the check above: prove it can find the word."""
    assert "gemini" in "a line naming gemini".lower()


def test_a_missing_plan_exits_two_and_says_so(
    tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
) -> None:
    code = okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(tmp_path / "nothing.json"),
            "--out",
            str(tmp_path / "out.json"),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
        ]
    )
    assert code == 2
    assert "nothing.json" in capsys.readouterr().err


# --- the empty plan: a judgement with nothing to keep -----------------------
#
# Measured on the K3 corpus: 4 of 12 judgements produced no artifact at all,
# because the adjudicator's verdict was "none of these segments should be
# persisted" and the parser refuses a plan with zero entries. That refusal is
# CORRECT for the run path -- an empty plan would silently persist nothing for a
# document that was dropped -- so the grammar is left alone and the recording
# tool is taught to record a rejection. The two are different acts: refusing to
# materialize is about a bundle, recording a judgement is about a person.


def empty_proposal(tmp_path: Path) -> Path:
    """A real proposal with its entries removed -- the plan-level fields stay
    exactly as the proposer wrote them, so this is a rejection and not a stub."""
    plan_path = proposal(tmp_path)
    written = payload(plan_path)
    written["entries"] = []
    rejected = tmp_path / "rejected.json"
    rejected.write_text(json.dumps(written, indent=2) + "\n", encoding="utf-8", newline="")
    return rejected


def adjudicate_empty(
    tmp_path: Path, plan_path: Path, out_name: str = "verdict.json"
) -> tuple[int, Path]:
    verdict = tmp_path / out_name
    code = okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(plan_path),
            "--out",
            str(verdict),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
        ]
    )
    return code, verdict


def test_a_judgement_over_an_empty_plan_gets_an_artifact(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    """The defect this closes: the judgement happened and left no trace."""
    code, verdict = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, empty_proposal(tmp_path))

    assert code == 0
    assert verdict.is_file()
    written = payload(verdict)
    assert written["entries"] == []
    assert written["adjudicated"] is True
    assert written["adjudicated_by"] == ADJUDICATOR
    assert written["adjudicated_at"] == AT


def test_the_empty_verdict_carries_the_dwell_time_at_the_top(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    """There is no entry to hang it on, and a ratified rejection with no time on
    it is as unfalsifiable as a ratified acceptance with none."""
    _, verdict = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, empty_proposal(tmp_path))
    written = payload(verdict)

    assert isinstance(written["adjudication_dwell_s"], int)
    assert not isinstance(written["adjudication_dwell_s"], bool)
    assert written["adjudication_dwell_s"] > 0


def test_the_empty_verdict_is_not_replayable_by_the_run_path(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    """The grammar is UNCHANGED. Recording a rejection and materializing from it
    are different acts, and only the first one is now possible."""
    _, verdict = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, empty_proposal(tmp_path))

    with pytest.raises(SegmentationError) as excinfo:
        parse_segmentation_plan(payload(verdict))

    assert excinfo.value.code == "segmentation_plan_invalid"


def test_the_rejected_proposal_survives_untouched(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    plan_path = empty_proposal(tmp_path)
    before = plan_path.read_bytes()

    adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, plan_path)

    assert plan_path.read_bytes() == before


def test_replaying_an_empty_verdict_produces_identical_bytes(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
    """K4a over the arm that had no artifact to compare before."""
    plan_path = empty_proposal(tmp_path)
    _, first = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, plan_path, "first.json")
    kept = first.read_bytes()

    _, second = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, plan_path, "second.json")

    assert second.read_bytes() == kept


def test_an_empty_plan_missing_a_required_field_is_still_refused(
    tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
) -> None:
    """The empty branch is not a hole in the validation: a plan is still a plan,
    and only its entry list is allowed to be empty."""
    plan_path = empty_proposal(tmp_path)
    written = payload(plan_path)
    del written["source_sha256"]
    plan_path.write_text(json.dumps(written), encoding="utf-8", newline="")

    code, verdict = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, plan_path)

    assert code == 2
    assert "source_sha256" in capsys.readouterr().err
    assert not verdict.exists()


def test_an_entries_value_that_is_not_a_list_is_still_refused(
    tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
) -> None:
    """Empty is a judgement; the wrong TYPE is a malformed plan, and the two
    must not collapse. The malformed one still meets the unchanged grammar.

    It reaches the caller as EXIT 2, the same code every other malformed plan
    already got. A grammar refusal used to escape as a traceback and exit 1,
    which said "this command crashed" where the truth was "this file is not a
    plan" -- and exit codes are the interface callers script against."""
    plan_path = empty_proposal(tmp_path)
    written = payload(plan_path)
    written["entries"] = "none"
    plan_path.write_text(json.dumps(written), encoding="utf-8", newline="")

    code, _ = adjudicate_empty(tmp_path, plan_path)

    assert code == 2
    assert "segmentation_plan_invalid" in capsys.readouterr().err
    assert not (tmp_path / "verdict.json").exists()


def test_a_malformed_non_empty_plan_exits_two_with_one_stderr_line(
    tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
) -> None:
    """The same refusal on the other branch: a plan with entries is parsed
    BEFORE anything is written, and that parse failing is a malformed plan too.

    One line, because a caller reading stderr to tell malformed from missing
    should not have to parse a traceback to do it."""
    plan_path = proposal(tmp_path)
    written = payload(plan_path)
    written["entries"][0]["span"] = [10, 3]
    plan_path.write_text(json.dumps(written), encoding="utf-8", newline="")
    capsys.readouterr()  # the proposer's own report is not what is under test

    code = okf_adjudicate.main(
        [
            "--plan",
            str(plan_path),
            "--out",
            str(tmp_path / "verdict.json"),
            "--adjudicator",
            ADJUDICATOR,
            "--adjudicated-at",
            AT,
        ]
    )

    assert code == 2
    stderr = capsys.readouterr().err
    assert len(stderr.strip().splitlines()) == 1
    assert "segmentation_span_invalid" in stderr
    assert not (tmp_path / "verdict.json").exists()