V6, settled by the operator today: import and report, not refuse. Door C imports the POINTER to executable code and never the code — it writes concepts verbatim and skips every non-`.md` file. So an imported Attested Computation can name an `executor`/`attester` resource that did not arrive, or one that RESOLVES against a file the destination tree already holds under that path. The second is the outcome worth surfacing: it looks valid. Refusing was the plan's leaning and is not what shipped. §14 forbids a consumer to reject a bundle over a broken cross-link and does not settle whether `executor.resource` is one; §10.5 asks a consumer to surface rather than silently drop. Reporting honours the second without testing the first, and leaves the door's one invariant — verbatim bytes — alone. `ImportResult.unverified_references` is an advisory over the merged set, not a fifth bucket: every concept it names has already merged, the bytes are unchanged, and a refused concept is never named (there is no imported pointer to check). The report is at KEY level, and that is a measured limit rather than a choice. Resolving the resource means reading `executor.resource` — the value the line-oriented parser cannot recover in either canonical form: a block mapping flattens and collides, a flow mapping stays one opaque string. A resource-level report would be empty or wrong on exactly the forms upstream writes. Precision arrives with the structured reader (D1b); the key-level signal is robust in both forms today. [skip-docs] is on the CLAUDE.md half only: README carries the new public surface (`unverified_references`), and the invariant this work put in CLAUDE.md — flow form, never block — landed with the previous commit and needs no restatement. 584 tests, mypy --strict clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KKKMwi7e7PVHoFW6dJK5XP
315 lines
13 KiB
Python
315 lines
13 KiB
Python
"""D4 — `Attested Computation`: format yes, runtime no.
|
|
|
|
Upstream §10 adds a concept type that carries not just what a value means but a
|
|
sanctioned way to compute it. This library supports its *format* — the five
|
|
contract fields for emission, judging and round-trip — and implements no
|
|
execution: the receipt and verdict wire formats are explicitly deferred
|
|
upstream, so there is no contract to build against.
|
|
|
|
Three groups:
|
|
|
|
1. **The five contract fields (§10.2).** Named in the profile's emission order
|
|
so a caller can write them in canonical position. Before this they fell into
|
|
`emit`'s sorted tail, which put `attester` ahead of `runtime` — alphabetical
|
|
order standing in for the contract's own.
|
|
2. **§10.2's one type-conditional requirement.** `runtime` is REQUIRED for this
|
|
type and for no other, which is the first rule in this library that keys off
|
|
a frontmatter *value* rather than a key. Reported, never raised: §14 forbids
|
|
a *consumer* to reject on much of what this schema judges, so the caller
|
|
decides what a violation means.
|
|
3. **What the scalar parser can and cannot read.** §10's canonical presentation
|
|
is nested block mappings. This library's line-oriented parser cannot
|
|
represent them — and the failure is silent data loss, not an error, which is
|
|
why it is pinned here rather than left to be discovered.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from llm_ingestion_okf.materialize import parse_frontmatter
|
|
from llm_ingestion_okf.profiles import DEFAULT, OKF_V0_2, STRICT_V1, FrontmatterSchema
|
|
from test_import_flow import CONCEPT, StubImportGate, place, run
|
|
|
|
ATTESTED = "Attested Computation"
|
|
|
|
# The §10.2 contract fields, in the order that section enumerates them.
|
|
CONTRACT_FIELDS = ("runtime", "parameters", "computation", "executor", "attester")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the five contract fields (§10.2) -------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_v0_2_profile_names_the_five_contract_fields() -> None:
|
|
"""Naming a key fixes its emission position; it does not demand it. §10.2
|
|
requires only `runtime`, and only for this type — the other four are
|
|
optional even on an Attested Computation."""
|
|
for key in CONTRACT_FIELDS:
|
|
assert key in OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.order
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_contract_fields_are_contiguous_and_in_section_10_2_order() -> None:
|
|
"""One contract, emitted as one block. Scattering the five across the
|
|
frontmatter would still parse, but the reader of a concept would have to
|
|
reassemble by hand what §10.2 presents together."""
|
|
order = OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.order
|
|
positions = [order.index(key) for key in CONTRACT_FIELDS]
|
|
assert positions == list(range(positions[0], positions[0] + len(CONTRACT_FIELDS)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_contract_field_no_longer_falls_into_the_alphabetical_tail() -> None:
|
|
"""`emit` writes named keys in profile order, then everything else SORTED.
|
|
While the five were unnamed that tail ordered them alphabetically, so
|
|
`attester` came out ahead of `runtime` — presentation deciding what the
|
|
contract says."""
|
|
values = {
|
|
"type": ATTESTED,
|
|
"attester": "{ resource: attesters/revenue.py }",
|
|
"runtime": "bigquery",
|
|
}
|
|
emitted = [line.partition(":")[0] for line in OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.emit(values).splitlines()]
|
|
assert emitted == ["type", "runtime", "attester"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_v0_1_profiles_gain_no_v0_2_contract_field() -> None:
|
|
"""V-A6: adding v0.2 support is behavior-neutral for the v0.1 profiles."""
|
|
for profile in (DEFAULT, STRICT_V1):
|
|
assert not set(CONTRACT_FIELDS) & set(profile.frontmatter.order)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- §10.2's one type-conditional requirement -----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_runtime_is_required_when_the_type_is_attested_computation() -> None:
|
|
"""§10.2: "REQUIRED for this type". The single field that says how to run
|
|
the computation, and so what `parameters` mean — an Attested Computation
|
|
without it is a contract that cannot be interpreted."""
|
|
violations = OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"type": ATTESTED})
|
|
assert [(v.key, v.code) for v in violations] == [
|
|
("runtime", "frontmatter_key_missing_for_type")
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_requirement_is_satisfied_by_the_field_itself() -> None:
|
|
assert OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"type": ATTESTED, "runtime": "bigquery"}) == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_other_four_contract_fields_stay_optional() -> None:
|
|
"""§10.2 makes exactly one of the five REQUIRED. `computation` absent means
|
|
the body fence is the computation (§10.3) — a valid concept, not a gap."""
|
|
assert OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"type": ATTESTED, "runtime": "python"}) == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_another_known_type_does_not_carry_the_requirement() -> None:
|
|
assert OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"type": "Concept"}) == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_an_unknown_type_carries_no_requirement_either() -> None:
|
|
"""§14: a consumer MUST NOT reject on unknown `type` values. A conditional
|
|
keyed on a type we do not know must therefore stay silent rather than
|
|
guess."""
|
|
assert OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"type": "Dashboard"}) == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_document_with_no_type_at_all_reports_only_the_missing_type() -> None:
|
|
"""The conditional keys off a value that is not there. It must not fire on
|
|
absence — that would report two violations for one defect."""
|
|
violations = OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.violations({"title": "Untyped"})
|
|
assert [(v.key, v.code) for v in violations] == [("type", "frontmatter_key_missing")]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_v0_1_profiles_do_not_judge_a_v0_2_type(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""V-A6 again, on the judging side: `Attested Computation` is a v0.2 type,
|
|
so a v0.1 profile has no rule about it and must invent none."""
|
|
assert DEFAULT.frontmatter.required_by_type == {}
|
|
assert DEFAULT.frontmatter.violations({"type": ATTESTED}) == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_type_conditional_key_must_be_inside_a_closed_allowlist() -> None:
|
|
"""The same rule `required` already carries: a schema that demands a key it
|
|
also forbids can never be satisfied. Checked at construction because a
|
|
profile is configuration, and configuration that cannot be satisfied should
|
|
fail where it is written, not where it is used."""
|
|
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="can never be satisfied"):
|
|
FrontmatterSchema(
|
|
order=("type",),
|
|
allowed=frozenset({"type"}),
|
|
required_by_type={ATTESTED: frozenset({"runtime"})},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- what the scalar parser can and cannot read ---------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_contract_fields_round_trip_in_their_flow_form(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The form this library can both write and read. §11 asks for a parseable
|
|
YAML block, and a flow mapping is one — V-A8 measured upstream's own reader
|
|
recovering our flow forms as structures."""
|
|
values = {
|
|
"type": ATTESTED,
|
|
"runtime": "bigquery",
|
|
"parameters": "[{ name: year, type: integer, required: true }]",
|
|
"executor": "{ resource: skills/run-on-bq.md, receipt: [job_id, executed_sql] }",
|
|
"attester": "{ resource: attesters/revenue.py }",
|
|
}
|
|
path = tmp_path / "revenue.md"
|
|
path.write_text(f"---\n{OKF_V0_2.frontmatter.emit(values)}\n---\n\n# Computation\n")
|
|
|
|
assert parse_frontmatter(path) == values
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_two_nested_block_mappings_sharing_a_key_collide_in_the_scalar_parser(
|
|
tmp_path: Path,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""Measured 2026-07-31, and the reason D4 stops at the flow form.
|
|
|
|
§10.2 presents `executor` and `attester` as nested BLOCK mappings, and both
|
|
carry a `resource`. The line-oriented parser has no indentation model, so it
|
|
flattens them into one namespace where the second `resource` overwrites the
|
|
first: `executor.resource` is lost and `attester.resource` surfaces as a
|
|
top-level key. No error is raised.
|
|
|
|
Pinned rather than fixed. Reading this form needs the structured reader
|
|
(D1b), and a half-reader that silently drops half a contract is worse than
|
|
one that never claimed to read it.
|
|
"""
|
|
path = tmp_path / "block-form.md"
|
|
path.write_text(
|
|
"---\n"
|
|
"type: Attested Computation\n"
|
|
"runtime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"executor:\n"
|
|
" resource: skills/run-on-bq.md\n"
|
|
" receipt: [job_id, executed_sql]\n"
|
|
"attester:\n"
|
|
" resource: attesters/revenue.py\n"
|
|
"---\n\n# Computation\n"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
parsed = parse_frontmatter(path)
|
|
|
|
assert parsed["executor"] == ""
|
|
assert parsed["attester"] == ""
|
|
assert parsed["resource"] == "attesters/revenue.py"
|
|
assert "skills/run-on-bq.md" not in parsed.values()
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- door C surfaces the §10 pointers it imports ---------------------------
|
|
#
|
|
# V6, decided by the operator 2026-07-31. Door C imports the POINTER to
|
|
# executable code while never importing the code: it writes concepts verbatim
|
|
# and skips every non-`.md` file. So an imported Attested Computation can
|
|
# reference an executor or attester that did not arrive — or, worse, one that
|
|
# resolves to a file the destination tree already holds under that name.
|
|
#
|
|
# The operator ruled: import and report, not refuse. Refusing sits against §14
|
|
# (a consumer MUST NOT reject a bundle for broken cross-links, and whether
|
|
# `executor.resource` is one the spec does not settle), while §10.5 asks a
|
|
# consumer to surface rather than silently drop. Reporting satisfies the second
|
|
# without testing the first.
|
|
#
|
|
# The report is at KEY level, not resource level, and that is a measured limit
|
|
# rather than a choice: resolving the resource means reading `executor.resource`,
|
|
# which is exactly the value this library's parser cannot recover (see above).
|
|
# Precision arrives with the structured reader (D1b).
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_merged_concept_declaring_an_executor_is_reported(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
gate = StubImportGate()
|
|
place(
|
|
tmp_path / "source",
|
|
"computations/margin.md",
|
|
"---\ntype: Attested Computation\nruntime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"executor: { resource: skills/run-on-bq.md, receipt: [job_id] }\n---\n\n# Computation\n",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
result, _ = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert [(r.concept_path, r.key) for r in result.unverified_references] == [
|
|
("computations/margin.md", "executor")
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_block_form_is_reported_too(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The form whose VALUE the parser loses. Key presence survives it, which is
|
|
what makes a key-level report robust where a resource-level one would be
|
|
silently empty on exactly the canonical presentation."""
|
|
gate = StubImportGate()
|
|
place(
|
|
tmp_path / "source",
|
|
"computations/margin.md",
|
|
"---\ntype: Attested Computation\nruntime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"attester:\n resource: attesters/margin.py\n---\n\n# Computation\n",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
result, _ = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert [(r.concept_path, r.key) for r in result.unverified_references] == [
|
|
("computations/margin.md", "attester")
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_both_pointers_are_reported_in_deterministic_order(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
gate = StubImportGate()
|
|
place(
|
|
tmp_path / "source",
|
|
"computations/margin.md",
|
|
"---\ntype: Attested Computation\nruntime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"executor: { resource: skills/run-on-bq.md }\n"
|
|
"attester: { resource: attesters/margin.py }\n---\n\n# Computation\n",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
result, _ = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert [(r.concept_path, r.key) for r in result.unverified_references] == [
|
|
("computations/margin.md", "attester"),
|
|
("computations/margin.md", "executor"),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_concept_carrying_neither_pointer_is_not_reported(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
gate = StubImportGate()
|
|
place(tmp_path / "source", "users.md", CONCEPT)
|
|
|
|
result, _ = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert result.unverified_references == ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_report_changes_neither_the_verdict_nor_the_bytes(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""Advisory, and only advisory. The concept merges, and it merges verbatim:
|
|
Door C's one invariant is that it never rewrites a sender's bytes, and a
|
|
report that moved a concept out of `merged` would be the refusal the
|
|
operator did not choose."""
|
|
document = (
|
|
"---\ntype: Attested Computation\nruntime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"executor: { resource: skills/run-on-bq.md }\n---\n\n# Computation\n"
|
|
)
|
|
gate = StubImportGate()
|
|
place(tmp_path / "source", "computations/margin.md", document)
|
|
|
|
result, bundle = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert [entry.concept_path for entry in result.merged] == ["computations/margin.md"]
|
|
assert result.merged[0].path.read_text(encoding="utf-8") == document
|
|
assert result.unverified_references != ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_refused_concept_is_never_reported(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""Nothing was written, so there is no imported pointer to surface. A report
|
|
on a refused concept would tell an operator to check a file that does not
|
|
exist."""
|
|
gate = StubImportGate(by_marker={"Attested Computation": "fail_secure"})
|
|
place(
|
|
tmp_path / "source",
|
|
"computations/margin.md",
|
|
"---\ntype: Attested Computation\nruntime: bigquery\n"
|
|
"executor: { resource: skills/run-on-bq.md }\n---\n\n# Computation\n",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
result, _ = run(tmp_path, gate)
|
|
|
|
assert result.merged == ()
|
|
assert result.unverified_references == ()
|