v0.5.0a1 shipped the one actor value the spec owner had already excluded.
Caught before any pilot was notified, so it costs a tag, not a migration.
Commons decided <fast id> = process:okf-ingest on 2026-07-31, on this repo's
own proposal, superseding option (d) (process:llm-ingestion-okf) chosen here on
07-27. The exclusion is ingest-spec.md:7-8, frozen on the spec being
framework-neutral: normalising OUR repo name into the normative id would force
every other conformant implementation to write it into its own output. Verified
against three independent sources before touching anything — commons' coord
message 20260731T154140Z, their plan :215-216/:244, and their STATE :37.
Why this had to land before the pilot notifications rather than after:
actor is both the stamp written and the value owned back (OwnershipPolicy),
and recognition is one-way. A pilot that had run Test A against the excluded
id would hold bundles this library stops recognising the moment the id is
corrected — collision_unstamped on their OWN files. That is the A-E5 failure
mode, and we would have inflicted it.
Worse, it would not have shown up as a failure: the plan's A-E3 expectation
(:854) named the same excluded value as the code, so Test A would have PASSED
and confirmed the error. Expectation and implementation agreeing is not
evidence when both predate the decision.
Nothing in the wild carried the old value: OKF_V0_2 did not exist at v0.4.0, so
the profile has never been released. v0.5.0a1 is abandoned, not moved — a tag
already on a public remote does not get force-pushed, and the history should
say plainly that a1 was wrong.
A-E3 now records both corrections with dates. The V1 paragraph at :1169 is
superseded in place rather than rewritten: its reasoning still holds, only its
outcome moved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVTup4v7tW9QiVyBENk2LV
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
805a2d50d9