open/llm-ingestion-pipeline-security
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 4 Activity

fix(sanitize,okf,active_content): three quadratic patterns, two on the input path

Browse source 
The generalised sweep found what 0.3.2's hand-written rows missed. All three are
the documented class -- a run in front of a required literal that never arrives,
so every start position rescans the tail -- and all three are worse than the
0.3.3 findings, because `sanitize`, `neutralize`, `scan_active_content` and the
okf link graph apply NO input cap. `scan_lexicon`/`scan_output` are the only
entry points that do, so there is no ceiling to extrapolate to.

  sanitize._HTML_COMMENT_RE   `<!--`*100_000        20.1s, exponent 1.96-2.14
  active_content.URL_IN_TEXT_RE  `<a `+`A`*100_000  12.99s / 14.9s, exponent ~2.0
  okf._MD_LINK_RE             `[`*100_000            7.1s, exponent 1.99-2.05

Each fix is the one the pattern's own shape allows, not a copied choice:

  - The comment stripper drops the regex for `str.find`. Excluding `<` would lose
    every comment containing markup; bounding the run would be a carrier bypass
    of the exact construct the stripper exists to remove.
  - `URL_IN_TEXT_RE` bounds its scheme run to an RFC 3986 scheme (`{0,63}`).
    Bounding is safe *here* only because it is a defanger inside a tag already
    flagged `active:raw-html`. A lookbehind was measured too and rejected: it
    drops `-http://evil.com`, a one-character evasion. Bounded: 0.185s at 1M.
  - `_MD_LINK_RE` excludes `[`, matching `active_content.MD_LINK_RE` exactly,
    including the nested-label trade already documented there.

`sanitize` claimed "no catastrophic backtracking" in a comment; that claim was
wrong in the same way `output`'s was before 0.3.2, and is corrected in place.

676 tests (+10), coverage 128/128 + 6/6 gaps, sweep clean across 150 patterns.
The okf destination run gets no row: `[^)\s]+` cannot fail, so a row for it
could never go red.
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-01 20:06:36 +02:00
commit 73fa1b99ae
9 changed files with 223 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
src/llm_ingestion_guard/okf.py
View file

@ -407,7 +407,14 @@ def _most_severe(dispositions):
# consumer that owns the corpus decides where the durable graph state lives.
# This in-import graph resolves links within a single bundle merge.
_MD_LINK_RE = re.compile(r"\[[^\]]*\]\(\s*([^)\s]+)")
# ReDoS note (OWASP LLM10): the label run excludes `[`, the character that opens
# this pattern's own anchor. Without it, a bundle body repeating `[` and never
# closing it makes every start position rescan the tail — 7.1s at 100_000 chars,
# exponent ~2.0, over attacker-supplied bodies this adapter reads with no input
# cap. Same defect and same fix as `active_content.MD_LINK_RE`, including the
# trade it names: a label containing a nested `[...]` is given up on, which costs
# no exfil coverage because the inner link is matched on its own.
_MD_LINK_RE = re.compile(r"\[[^\]\[]*\]\(\s*([^)\s]+)")
# Active-content schemes are refused in a link, mirroring the resource gate (T3).
_DANGEROUS_LINK_SCHEMES = frozenset({"javascript", "data", "vbscript", "file", "blob"})