1
0
Fork 0

release(0.5.0): the assessment axis ships, and every version surface moves with it

0.5.0 is the axis separation `de09711` built: `Risk` (assessment) alongside
`Disposition` (action), `Policy.action_map` as the supported override, and the
fail-closed path pinned to both axes. Additive and measured to be so — 717
passing with no test changed, matrix 128/128 with 6/6 documented gaps, the
`PRESET_USER_UPLOAD` grading table unchanged row by row. Plus the field FP
measurement (`d1bff60`) and the 0.3.3 behaviour-change correction (`d3d0928`).

WHY THIS COMMIT TOUCHES EIGHT FILES AND 0.4.0's TOUCHED THREE

0.4.0's release commit updated CHANGELOG, pyproject.toml and __init__.py, and
deferred README deliberately: the install block should not name a tag before a
clean-venv install had proven it resolved. Sound reasoning, and the proof step
never ran — so tag v0.4.0 permanently advertises v0.3.4. The tag is not moved.
The ordering is.

Sweeping every tracked file for a version claim, instead of ticking the four
surfaces the checklist named, found five more that no release had ever touched:

  SECURITY.md          "pre-1.0 (0.2.x)" — the one with a consequence for an
                       outsider: it named a support window two minor lines
                       behind the code.
  README.md            "**Status:** v0.3" — the front page, stale since 0.4.0.
  docs/BRIEF.md        "v0.2 (alpha)" — stale since 0.3.0.
  CLAUDE.md            "v0.2 (alpha)" and "12 moduler" where src/ has 15.
  docs/ADOPTION-BRIEF  "703 passing" where the suite is at 717.

Measurement provenance is deliberately left alone: "New in v0.4.0", "verified
identical on 0.2.0 and 0.3.1", "measured against the v0.3.1 tag", every
"post-0.4.0 tree" in LIMITATIONS. Bumping those falsifies the record instead of
updating it, which is why this cannot be a sed sweep — the surfaces have to be
sorted into current-state and provenance before a single edit.

Found because llm-ingestion-okf took our report of this defect class as a
hypothesis about their own repo, measured it, found a worse instance on their
public front page, and sent back the generalization: writing down a trap is not
the same as applying it.

VERIFIED BEFORE COMMITTING, NOT AFTER

  717 passed; coverage 128/128 recall, 6/6 documented gaps hold
  docs/LIMITATIONS.md: 33 items, README says 33
  fp-sweep reproduced all three published numbers exactly on the bumped tree —
    vendor-harvest 98/185 (53.0%), generated-notes 88/547 (16.1%),
    reference-corpus 133/389 (34.2%) — and self-docs runs clean, so the
    untested script survived the bump it imports names from
  forge description: 178 codepoints, under the 180 cap
  no tracked file carries a stale current-state version claim

Still to prove before the tag: a clean-venv install from this commit's sha, and
`git show <sha>` over the README. The install proves the package builds; only
the grep proves the text the tag will carry is right. That second check is the
one the old ordering could not perform, because by then the tag existed.
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-11 06:42:56 +02:00
commit f669479777
8 changed files with 47 additions and 11 deletions

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
especially one converging on Google's Open Knowledge Format (OKF v0.1) — and needs
to decide **when** and **where** to add a write-time ingestion guard.
**Status of the guard:** `v0.4.0` (alpha). Stdlib-only core, framework-agnostic.
**Status of the guard:** `v0.5.0` (alpha). Stdlib-only core, framework-agnostic.
Public API may still change. Read the known-limitations section before you rely
on it.
@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ live payload:
python -m llm_ingestion_guard.coverage # exit 0 = all as documented
```
As of `v0.4.0`: **128 / 128 defended classes demonstrated (recall 100%)** and **6 /
As of `v0.5.0`: **128 / 128 defended classes demonstrated (recall 100%)** and **6 /
6 documented gaps still hold** (a *closed* gap fails the test, forcing a doc
update). The matrix is the single source of truth for the test suite (**703
update). The matrix is the single source of truth for the test suite (**717
passing**), which also asserts total recall, that every lexicon pattern has a
case (so the matrix cannot fall behind the lexicon), the full LLM02 secret-egress
set, and the container-layer front-end (CSV formula-injection, zip-slip/bomb,

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
**A reusable, minimal, dependency-light defensive layer for LLM *ingestion*
pipelines — the write-time siblings of query-time chatbot guardrails.**
Status: implemented — v0.2 (alpha). This document defines what the repo contains
Status: implemented — v0.5 (alpha). This document defines what the repo contains
and why; the stdlib-only core is built and tested (see `README.md` for usage and
`docs/PLAN.md` for the build order).