1. The layout block still described calibration.json as holding "entropy
floors, scan caps, disposition ranks" — the same never-delivered content
the seed-source row and the README row were already corrected for. Third
copy, same defect. Grepped the repo to confirm no fourth: the remaining
hits either describe the absence or belong to active-content.json's own
Shannon-entropy floor, which is a real thing from a different source.
Tightened the calibration log entry so it cannot be read as denying that.
2. Definition of Done item 2 claimed every file is present or "explicitly and
visibly stubbed". Three are neither — they are absent and marked Planned.
Item 2 now records that it is unmet, which three files are missing, why
absent beats stubbed (an empty conformance/ and a contentless normative
spec would both PASS the mechanical checks in this document while making
the repo look more finished than it is), and that the tag decision is the
operator's. The DoD is what a future session reads to decide whether
v0.1.0 is done; it must not assert a bar the repo does not clear.
3. The lexicon's "83/83 compile in both runtimes" claim had been produced
against the raw dump, not against the committed JSON — this repo's stated
standard is that a fidelity claim comes from a command over the artifact.
Re-run against lexicon/injection-lexicon.json: 83/83 in Python re, 83/83
in Node bare and under `u`. Also confirmed the \uXXXX escapes survive the
JSON round-trip with the right semantics — the zero-width class matches
U+200B and rejects U+00AD, the Cyrillic class matches U+0430 and rejects
U+0445. The claim stands as written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FaYqid3mejFmd9ZHsiHgp3
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
93f7bc024f