# CI/CD Integration Guide Integrate llm-security into your CI/CD pipeline for automated security scanning of AI/LLM projects. The standalone CLI runs 14 deterministic Node.js scanners — no AI models, no external API calls, no data leaves your pipeline environment. ## Data Sovereignty **The standalone CLI makes zero network calls by default.** All 14 scanners operate locally on your source code using Shannon entropy analysis, regex pattern matching, AST traversal, and git log parsing. No data is transmitted to any external service. **Exception: supply-chain-recheck** — When scanning lockfiles for known vulnerabilities, this scanner optionally queries the [OSV.dev](https://osv.dev/) batch API. This sends only package names and versions (not source code) over HTTPS. To disable: set `LLM_SECURITY_SCR_OFFLINE=1`. **What about Claude Code integration?** The Claude Code plugin (hooks, agents, commands) uses AI models and sends data to Anthropic. These components are **not included** in the standalone CLI. When you run `npx llm-security scan`, only deterministic scanners execute. ### Schrems II / NSM Compliance - Standalone CLI: **fully compliant** — no cross-border data transfer - OSV.dev queries (opt-in): sends package metadata to Google-operated API — evaluate per your organization's data classification - Claude Code plugin: sends code context to Anthropic (US) — requires data processing agreement for regulated environments ### Norwegian Regulatory Context - **NSM Grunnprinsipper:** Automated security scanning fulfills GP 3.1 (vulnerability management) and GP 2.4 (secure development) - **Digitaliseringsdirektoratet:** Aligns with recommended practices for AI system development lifecycle security - **EU AI Act:** Directly supports Art. 9 (risk management) and Art. 15 (cybersecurity) requirements. Note the Digital Omnibus (European Parliament 16 June 2026, Council 29 June 2026) deferred the high-risk obligations these articles sit under — to 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I regulated products. Transparency obligations still apply from 2 August 2026, so this remains preparatory rather than deadline-driven work ## 5-Minute Setup ### GitHub Actions Copy `ci/github-action.yml` to `.github/workflows/llm-security.yml`: ```yaml name: LLM Security Scan on: [push, pull_request] jobs: security-scan: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: security-events: write steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '18' - run: npx llm-security scan . --fail-on high --format sarif --output-file results.sarif - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3 if: always() with: sarif_file: results.sarif ``` SARIF results appear in the repository's **Security** tab under **Code scanning alerts**. ### Azure DevOps Copy `ci/azure-pipelines.yml` to your pipeline, or include the scan step in an existing pipeline: ```yaml steps: - task: NodeTool@0 inputs: versionSpec: '18.x' - script: npx llm-security scan . --fail-on high --format sarif --output-file $(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)/results.sarif displayName: Run llm-security scan - task: PublishBuildArtifacts@1 condition: always() inputs: pathToPublish: $(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)/results.sarif artifactName: llm-security-scan ``` For Azure DevOps Advanced Security, replace `PublishBuildArtifacts@1` with `AdvancedSecurity-Publish@1`. ### GitLab CI Add to `.gitlab-ci.yml`: ```yaml llm-security-scan: image: node:18-alpine stage: test script: - npx llm-security scan . --fail-on high --format sarif --output-file results.sarif artifacts: paths: - results.sarif reports: sast: results.sarif when: always ``` SAST report parsing requires GitLab Ultimate. On Free/Premium tiers, download the SARIF artifact manually. ## Configuration ### CLI Flags | Flag | Description | |------|-------------| | `--fail-on ` | Exit 1 if any finding at or above severity exists. Values: `critical`, `high`, `medium`, `low` | | `--compact` | One-liner per finding format. Reduces CI log noise | | `--format sarif` | Output OASIS SARIF 2.1.0 (default: JSON) | | `--output-file ` | Write full results to file. Stdout gets compact aggregate | | `--baseline` | Diff against stored baseline (show new/resolved findings) | | `--save-baseline` | Save current results as baseline for future diffs | ### Policy File Configure defaults in `.llm-security/policy.json`: ```json { "ci": { "failOn": "high", "compact": true } } ``` CLI flags always take precedence over policy file values. ### Environment Variables | Variable | Description | |----------|-------------| | `LLM_SECURITY_SCR_OFFLINE=1` | Disable OSV.dev network calls in supply-chain-recheck | | `LLM_SECURITY_AUDIT_LOG=` | Write structured JSONL audit trail (SIEM-ready) | ## Exit Codes | Code | Meaning | When | |------|---------|------| | `0` | Clean / below threshold | No findings at or above `--fail-on` level, or ALLOW verdict | | `1` | Threshold exceeded | Findings at or above `--fail-on` level, or WARNING verdict (without `--fail-on`) | | `2` | Block | BLOCK verdict (only without `--fail-on`) | With `--fail-on`, exit codes are binary: 0 (clean) or 1 (threshold exceeded). Without `--fail-on`, the legacy tri-state (0/1/2) is preserved. ## What Gets Scanned The 14 deterministic scanners cover: | Scanner | Detects | |---------|---------| | Unicode | Zero-width characters, homoglyphs, Unicode Tag steganography | | Entropy | High-entropy strings (potential secrets/tokens) | | Permission | Overly broad permissions, missing tool justification | | Dependency | Known vulnerable packages, typosquats | | Taint | Untrusted input flows to sensitive operations | | Git forensics | Force pushes, sensitive file history, author anomalies | | Network | Suspicious URLs, exfiltration endpoints, C2 patterns | | Memory poisoning | Injection patterns in CLAUDE.md, memory files, rules | | Supply chain | Lockfile audit, blocklists, OSV.dev (opt-in) | | Workflow | CI/CD workflow injection — untrusted triggers, unpinned actions, spoofed bots | | Trigger abuse | Activation-surface abuse in command/agent/skill frontmatter — shadowing, baiting, overly broad triggers | | Signature | Known-malware identity match (webshells, reverse shells, cryptominers, hacktools) | | AST taint | Scope-aware Python taint analysis (parse-only), falls back to regex taint tracing | | Toxic flow | Lethal trifecta correlation (input + access + exfil) | ## Local Testing Test the exact same command locally before adding to CI: ```bash # With npx (requires npm publish) npx llm-security scan . --fail-on high --compact # With local clone node bin/llm-security.mjs scan . --fail-on high --compact ```