open/ms-ai-architect
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Activity

docs(ms-ai-architect): idx-26c bokfort — idx 26-reparasjonen gjorde en latent ufullstendighet til en aktiv pastand

Browse source 
Den live-hentingen som lukket idx 26 listet SJU kanoniske scorecard-segmenter.
Lista etter reparasjonen barer fem: model performance og cohorts mangler.
('Cohort analysis' star i Customization-blokka, ikke som enumerert segment, sa
den kurerer ikke utelatelsen.)

For denne okten var det en latent ufullstendighet under et udatert stempel. Ved
a datere stempelet til 2026-08-03 gjorde vi det til en positiv pastand om at
nettopp denne enumerasjonen ble verifisert den dagen — over innhold samme dags
verifisering viste manglet to medlemmer.

Funnet la allerede inne i idx 26s egen resolution, som siterer alle sju mens
fila lister fem. Bokfort framfor a foldes inn: idx 26s ratifiserte scope var
falskheten i item 4 og 5, ikke listas fullstendighet.

Tredje gang pa to okter at defekten la VED SIDEN AV editen framfor I den.

Ogsa markert: sitatblokkens andre setning er utledet fra fravaer i en
enumerasjon, ikke fra en positiv kildepastand — naer sikker, men en slutning.

Ko: 6 apne / 2 resolved. Suite 1047/1047.

[skip-docs]
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-03 21:30:09 +02:00
commit 065a55f3c5
2 changed files with 30 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

19
docs/r11-pilot-results.md
View file

@ -898,7 +898,24 @@ is a cross-attribution between two standards, not loose wording. It was entered
its own queue member rather than repaired inside a ratified entry, per gap
discipline: folding unbooked work into a ratified entry launders it.
**Queue state: 5 open, 2 resolved.** Suite 1047/1047; both idx 26 anchors correctly
**And the repair itself opened one — idx-26c.** The same live fetch listed **seven**
canonical segments; the corrected list carries **five**. `model performance` and
`cohorts` are absent. That was a latent incompleteness under an undated stamp; dating
the stamp to `2026-08-03` converted it into a positive claim that *this* enumeration
was verified that day, over content the same day's verification showed to be short two
members. **The finding was already sitting inside idx 26's own `resolution` field,
which quotes all seven while the file lists five** — booked, not folded in, because
idx 26's ratified scope was the falsity of items 4 and 5, not the completeness of the
list. This is the third time in two sessions that the defect was next to the edit
rather than in it.
**One sentence is weaker than the rest, and is marked as such.** The blockquote's
second clause — that the two components have no segments of their own in the PDF — is
derived from *absence in an enumeration*, not from a positive statement in the source.
The "How to read your scorecard" walk-through is structurally exhaustive, so it is
near-certain, but it is an inference and is recorded here as one.
**Queue state: 6 open, 2 resolved.** Suite 1047/1047; both idx 26 anchors correctly
stopped matching, and the entry carries its `resolution`.
## Appendix A — the 15 admitted proposals, hand-verified