open/ms-ai-architect
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 1 Activity

fix(ms-ai-architect): idx-26f dialekt-retting — reparasjonen feilet paa sin egen begrunnende akse

Browse source 
Punkt 2 landet som 'fairness-target values', et hybridkompositum som er hverken
norsk eller engelsk, der punkt 1 gjengir samme kildebegrep som 'target-verdiene'.
Dialekt-konsistens var HELE argumentet for aa velge omskriving framfor sletting,
saa reparasjonen feilet paa aksen den ble begrunnet med. Rettet til
'fairness-maalverdiene'.

Koherens-gjennomlesingen etter foerste edit sjekket innholds-samsvar og slapp den
gjennom - den sjekket ikke kompositum-former. En koherens-sjekk arver aksen du
hadde i tankene da du skrev den.

Ratifiseringen laa i LABELEN ('kildens ordlyd i idx-26d-dialekten'); previewet bar
den defekte formen. Labelen er det ratifiserte objektet, saa rettingen krevde ingen
re-ratifisering - men et preview som gjengir labelen feil er en levende maate aa
smugle en uratifisert form forbi en operatoer som leser previewet.

I tillegg: idx-26f-resolutionen skiller naa eksplisitt mellom punkt 2/5 (re-verifisert
denne oekten) og punkt 1/3/6/7 (verifisert under idx-26d samme dag, arvet - ikke
re-kjoert her).

Suite 1047/1047.
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-03 22:32:09 +02:00
commit 80e17ec462
3 changed files with 23 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

21
docs/r11-pilot-results.md
View file

@ -1172,11 +1172,32 @@ documents catching.
Cross-file grep before editing put all three replaced strings at zero occurrences
elsewhere in the corpus.
**The repair failed on its own justifying axis, and the coherence check passed it.**
Item 2 first landed as `fairness-target values` — a hybrid compound that is neither
language, where item 1 renders the same source concept as `target-verdiene`. Dialect
consistency was the entire argument for choosing rewrite over deletion, so this is the
repair failing the axis it was justified by. The whole-list re-read after the edit
checked *content* alignment and passed; it did not check compound forms. **A coherence
check inherits the axis you had in mind when you wrote it** — the same blind spot as a
string invariant, one level up. Corrected to `fairness-målverdiene`.
Note where the ratification sat: the operator approved the label *"kildens ordlyd i
idx-26d-dialekten"*, while the illustrative preview carried the defective form. The
label is the ratified object, so correcting toward it needed no re-ratification — but
a preview that renders the label wrongly is a live way to smuggle an unratified form
past an operator who is reading the preview.
**The transferable part: the cheapest true edit is rarely the smallest diff.** A repair
scoped to exactly the words an entry names will silently adopt whatever unmeasured
content sits beside them — and adoption under a verification stamp is indistinguishable,
to a reader, from verification.
**One provenance seam left explicit rather than smoothed over.** The stamp's coverage
after this closure rests on two different acts: items 2 and 5 were re-verified against
the live source *this* session, items 1/3/6/7 under idx-26d earlier the same day. Same
page, same stamp date — but one is inherited, not re-run, and idx-26f's resolution now
says so in those terms rather than presenting all six as a single verification.
**Queue state: 6 open, 8 resolved.** Suite 1047/1047.
## Appendix A — the 15 admitted proposals, hand-verified