Legger de fem deterministiske sjekkene fra Anthropics «Skill authoring best practices» som K1–K10-rubrikken manglet, i begge lag av score-motoren: - eval.mjs (disk-laget): extractName + checkN1..checkN5 - N1 name-validitet (≤64, a-z0-9-, ingen «claude»/«anthropic»; gerund rapporteres, gater ikke) - N2 description ikke-tom + ≤1024 tegn - N3 refs én nivå dypt (ref-fil lenker ikke til annen ref-fil) - N4 TOC i ref-filer >100 linjer (delpoeng = andel store filer med TOC) - N5 forward-slash-stier (ingen Windows-backslash-stier i body) wiret inn i evalSkill.deterministic (leser nå ref-fil-innhold for N3/N4) - lib/skill-score.mjs (ren): N1–N5 i CRITERIA (vekt 1, ikke-gulv, det) Live-sanity mot de 5 skills: N1/N2/N5 rene, N3 fanger ekte nøstet ref i advisor (licensing-matrix.md → 3 andre ref-filer), N4 avdekker 387 store ref-filer uten TOC (primær forbedringsspak for oppgraderingsfasen). Tester: kb-eval 110→134 (+24). validate 239, kb-update 316 uendret grønt. [skip-docs]: N1–N5 alt spesifisert i docs/skill-quality-scoring-plan.md §2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
178 lines
8 KiB
JavaScript
178 lines
8 KiB
JavaScript
// tests/kb-eval/test-skill-score.test.mjs
|
|
// Unit tests for the PURE skill-quality scoring lib (Spor D).
|
|
// scoreSkill(evalObj) consumes the object shape produced by eval.mjs's
|
|
// evalSkill() + attachSiblingOverlap() + merged judge results, and returns a
|
|
// weighted 0-100 score with a hard floor on the load-bearing criteria (K1, K10).
|
|
// See docs/skill-quality-scoring-plan.md §2 for the rubric->score mapping.
|
|
|
|
import { test } from 'node:test';
|
|
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
|
|
import { scoreSkill, TARGET, FLOOR_CAP } from '../../scripts/kb-eval/lib/skill-score.mjs';
|
|
|
|
// --- fixture builder: a fully-passing eval object (all sub-scores = 1) -------
|
|
function perfectEval(overrides = {}) {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
name: 'ms-ai-test',
|
|
deterministic: {
|
|
K2_descriptionFormat: { pass: true },
|
|
K3_bodyLength: { bodyLines: 120, pass: true },
|
|
K5_progressiveDisclosure: { namedRatio: 0.5, pass: true },
|
|
K6_routingTable: { pass: true },
|
|
refCountConsistency: { consistent: true, mismatches: [] },
|
|
K9_timeSensitiveHints: { timeSensitiveTokenHits: 0 },
|
|
K10_siblingScopeOverlap: { maxCombined: 2.0, worstSibling: 'x', pass: true, threshold: 7.0 },
|
|
N1_nameValidity: { pass: true },
|
|
N2_descriptionLength: { pass: true, length: 500 },
|
|
N3_refNestingDepth: { pass: true, nested: [] },
|
|
N4_refToc: { largeFiles: 5, withToc: 5, ratio: 1, pass: true },
|
|
N5_forwardSlashPaths: { pass: true, windowsPaths: [] },
|
|
},
|
|
judgeInputs: { description: 'desc', bodyLines: 120 },
|
|
judge: {
|
|
K1_triggerPrecision: { precision: 1, pass: true },
|
|
K4_noDuplication: { score: 5, pass: true },
|
|
K7_imperativeStyle: { ratio: 1, pass: true },
|
|
K8_sourceCitation: { ratio: 1, pass: true },
|
|
K9_noTimeSensitive: { pass: true, findings: [] },
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
// shallow-merge deterministic + judge so a test can override one criterion
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
deterministic: { ...base.deterministic, ...(overrides.deterministic || {}) },
|
|
judge: overrides.judge === null ? null : { ...base.judge, ...(overrides.judge || {}) },
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — a fully-passing skill scores 100 and meets the target', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval());
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, 100);
|
|
assert.equal(r.meetsTarget, true);
|
|
assert.equal(r.judged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(r.floored, false);
|
|
assert.equal(r.improvements.length, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — TARGET is 90 and FLOOR_CAP is below it', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(TARGET, 90);
|
|
assert.ok(FLOOR_CAP < TARGET);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — failing K10 (deterministic floor) caps the score below target despite a perfect rest', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { K10_siblingScopeOverlap: { maxCombined: 7.4, worstSibling: 'y', pass: false, threshold: 7.0 } },
|
|
}));
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, FLOOR_CAP, 'capped at the floor');
|
|
assert.equal(r.floored, true);
|
|
assert.equal(r.meetsTarget, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.some((i) => i.key === 'K10' && i.floor === true));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — failing K1 (judge floor) caps the score below target', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
judge: { K1_triggerPrecision: { precision: 0.6, pass: false } },
|
|
}));
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, FLOOR_CAP);
|
|
assert.equal(r.meetsTarget, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.some((i) => i.key === 'K1' && i.floor === true));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — partial credit: K3 over-length and K4 mid-score reduce the score proportionally', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { K3_bodyLength: { bodyLines: 600, pass: false } }, // sub = 1-(600-500)/500 = 0.8
|
|
judge: { K4_noDuplication: { score: 3, pass: false } }, // sub = 3/5 = 0.6
|
|
}));
|
|
// Neither K3 nor K4 is a floor criterion, so the score is the weighted mean, not capped.
|
|
assert.ok(r.score < 100 && r.score > FLOOR_CAP, `expected high-but-imperfect, got ${r.score}`);
|
|
assert.equal(r.floored, false);
|
|
const k3 = r.criteria.find((c) => c.key === 'K3');
|
|
const k4 = r.criteria.find((c) => c.key === 'K4');
|
|
assert.ok(Math.abs(k3.sub - 0.8) < 1e-9, `K3 sub was ${k3.sub}`);
|
|
assert.ok(Math.abs(k4.sub - 0.6) < 1e-9, `K4 sub was ${k4.sub}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — degrades gracefully when unjudged: judge criteria excluded, K10 floor still enforced', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({ judge: null }));
|
|
assert.equal(r.judged, false);
|
|
assert.equal(r.provisional, true, 'K1 floor cannot be enforced without judge → provisional');
|
|
// all deterministic criteria pass → score 100 over the available (det) set
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, 100);
|
|
// no judge criteria should appear as available
|
|
assert.ok(!r.criteria.some((c) => c.available && c.source === 'judge'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — unjudged + failing K10 still floors (deterministic floor independent of judge)', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
judge: null,
|
|
deterministic: { K10_siblingScopeOverlap: { maxCombined: 9.0, worstSibling: 'z', pass: false, threshold: 7.0 } },
|
|
}));
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, FLOOR_CAP);
|
|
assert.equal(r.meetsTarget, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — improvements are sorted by weighted points lost (descending)', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { K2_descriptionFormat: { pass: false } }, // weight 1, lose 1.0
|
|
judge: { K4_noDuplication: { score: 0, pass: false } }, // weight 2, lose 2.0 -> first
|
|
}));
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.length >= 2);
|
|
assert.equal(r.improvements[0].key, 'K4', 'biggest weighted loss first');
|
|
for (let i = 1; i < r.improvements.length; i++) {
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements[i - 1].pointsLost >= r.improvements[i].pointsLost);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — every improvement carries a concrete fix string', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { K3_bodyLength: { bodyLines: 700, pass: false } },
|
|
}));
|
|
const k3 = r.improvements.find((i) => i.key === 'K3');
|
|
assert.ok(k3 && typeof k3.fix === 'string' && k3.fix.length > 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — N1-N5 deterministic criteria are all scored on a perfect eval', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval());
|
|
for (const key of ['N1', 'N2', 'N3', 'N4', 'N5']) {
|
|
const c = r.criteria.find((x) => x.key === key);
|
|
assert.ok(c && c.available, `${key} should be an available criterion`);
|
|
assert.equal(c.source, 'det', `${key} is deterministic`);
|
|
assert.equal(c.floor, false, `${key} is not a floor criterion`);
|
|
}
|
|
assert.equal(r.score, 100, 'all N1-N5 passing keeps the perfect score');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — N4 (TOC) gives partial credit proportional to coverage ratio', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { N4_refToc: { largeFiles: 4, withToc: 2, ratio: 0.5, pass: false } },
|
|
}));
|
|
const n4 = r.criteria.find((c) => c.key === 'N4');
|
|
assert.ok(Math.abs(n4.sub - 0.5) < 1e-9, `N4 sub was ${n4.sub}`);
|
|
assert.equal(r.floored, false, 'N4 is not a floor criterion');
|
|
assert.ok(r.score < 100 && r.score > FLOOR_CAP, `expected high-but-imperfect, got ${r.score}`);
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.some((i) => i.key === 'N4'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — an invalid name (N1) is a non-floor miss that lands in improvements', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { N1_nameValidity: { pass: false } },
|
|
}));
|
|
const n1 = r.criteria.find((c) => c.key === 'N1');
|
|
assert.equal(n1.sub, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(r.floored, false, 'N1 does not floor the score');
|
|
assert.ok(r.meetsTarget, 'a single non-floor binary miss should not drop below 90');
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.some((i) => i.key === 'N1' && typeof i.fix === 'string'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — nested references (N3) reduce the score', () => {
|
|
const r = scoreSkill(perfectEval({
|
|
deterministic: { N3_refNestingDepth: { pass: false, nested: [{ file: 'references/a.md', links: ['b.md'] }] } },
|
|
}));
|
|
assert.ok(r.score < 100);
|
|
assert.ok(r.improvements.some((i) => i.key === 'N3'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scoreSkill — tolerates a null/garbage eval object without throwing', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(scoreSkill(null), null);
|
|
assert.equal(scoreSkill({}), null);
|
|
});
|