The operator's view of the long feedback loop (S5.1-analog, parity row 22;
buildable after K5): which proposals still AWAIT an expert verdict, and who
should judge each — a pure file-based id-join across the three layers hitl
READS and NEVER writes (role split §3 Step 7: the expert writes the inbox, the
system reads it; notification is K10's job, never this).
- hitl.py:
* pending_proposals — the id-join. An outbox proposal (K5) is pending unless
its persisted verdict_id (read verbatim from {run_id}-outcome.json, minted
the SAME way the inbox mints a verdict id — the K5 assumption) is in the
settled set. settled = §4.2-valid inbox verdicts (THROUGH load_inbox, so a
skipped/unknown decision never settles anything) ∪ promoted verdicts (§6,
optional bundle_dirs, so the core join is exactly outbox↔inbox).
* RoutingContract — nøkkel→ekspert, schema-validated fail-fast (§10): non-empty
table, non-empty keys/expert ids, optional default_expert. route_pending maps
a proposal's measure (a config-string key NOW; K13 formalizes the dimension
catalog) to an expert; an unmatched measure → default, else UNROUTED.
* CLI python -m …hitl pending|route — pending is a pure report (exit 0); route
loads the routing config fail-fast (a malformed/missing config exits non-zero
WITHOUT touching any layer). Neither subcommand writes anything.
- test_hitl_loadbearing.py: 23 tests. TWO seams detach-proven RED — the id-join
seam (drop the `not in settled` filter → a judged proposal is STILL listed →
red) and the read-only seam (any read path that writes a byte → the before/
after outbox+inbox snapshot diverges → red). Covers: undecided → pending,
inbox/promoted verdict settles, exact-id join (no coincidental match), skipped
decision does not settle, deterministic order, malformed routing fail-fast,
measure→expert / default / UNROUTED, and the CLI subcommands.
- 521→544 green, golden byte-exact, full gate clean (ruff+format+mypy strict,
25 src files). README: test-count sync ×2 + hitl module note + load-bearing
mention. IKKE-scope (held): notification (K10), web-UI, writing the inbox.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RiTwaKLesgcwXx2mDviqpt
385 lines
16 KiB
Python
385 lines
16 KiB
Python
"""HITL verdict routing + pending tracking — LOAD-BEARING (S5.1-analog; §5, §11; K9).
|
|
|
|
The seam this file keeps alive: the operator sees which proposals still AWAIT a
|
|
verdict, and who should judge each — a pure file-based id-join across the three
|
|
layers hitl READS (never writes). A proposal is *pending* when its persisted
|
|
``verdict_id`` (minted by K5 into ``{run_id}-outcome.json``) has NO matching
|
|
verdict in the inbox and NO matching promoted verdict in a bundle. Routing maps
|
|
the proposal's measure (a config-string key NOW; K13 formalizes the dimension
|
|
catalog) to an expert.
|
|
|
|
Role split (§3 Step 7, unwaivable): hitl READS both settled layers and the
|
|
outbox; writing the inbox is the authoring primitive's job (K10 does
|
|
notification, never this). RED if hitl ever writes.
|
|
|
|
Two detached seams proven RED here:
|
|
|
|
* Detach proof (the id-join seam): drop the ``not in settled`` filter in
|
|
``pending_proposals`` so it returns every outbox proposal → a judged proposal
|
|
is still listed as pending → ``test_inbox_verdict_settles_the_proposal`` red.
|
|
* Detach proof (the read-only seam): make any read path write a byte → the
|
|
before/after snapshot of outbox+inbox diverges →
|
|
``test_hitl_never_writes`` red.
|
|
|
|
Key assumption (pinned in K5's ``test_outbox_loadbearing`` and reused here): the
|
|
outcome's ``verdict_id`` is minted the SAME way the inbox mints a verdict id
|
|
(``mint_verdict_id`` over the candidate features), so an inbox verdict about the
|
|
same candidate joins by id.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import json
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
from pydantic import ValidationError
|
|
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.experience import CandidateFeatures, mint_verdict_id
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.hitl import (
|
|
PendingProposal,
|
|
RoutingContract,
|
|
load_routing,
|
|
main,
|
|
pending_proposals,
|
|
route_pending,
|
|
settled_verdict_ids,
|
|
)
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.inbox import VerdictDocument, write_verdict
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.ir import AffectedItem, SavingsProposal
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.loop import RunResult
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.outbox import persist_outbox
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.promotion import promote
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.provenance import Citation, Provenance
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.validator import ValidatedProposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- fixtures: outbox pairs, inbox verdicts, promoted verdicts -------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _proposal(measure: str = "LED-retrofit", code: str = "EL-01") -> SavingsProposal:
|
|
return SavingsProposal(
|
|
project_id="bygg-kontor-nord",
|
|
measure=measure,
|
|
affected_items=[AffectedItem(code=code, quantity=100, unit_cost=250.0)],
|
|
claimed_saving_nok=20000.0,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _run(proposal: SavingsProposal) -> RunResult:
|
|
return RunResult(
|
|
outcome=ValidatedProposal(
|
|
validates=True,
|
|
claimed_saving_nok=20000.0,
|
|
nominal_feasible=25000.0,
|
|
p10=18000.0,
|
|
p50=22000.0,
|
|
p90=27000.0,
|
|
),
|
|
validator_decision="validated",
|
|
checker_decision="approve",
|
|
attempts=1,
|
|
proposal=proposal,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _provenance() -> Provenance:
|
|
return Provenance(
|
|
citations=[Citation(file="index.md", span="chars 0-5", snippet="Bygg-")],
|
|
model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
|
|
role="proposer",
|
|
validator_decision="validated",
|
|
tokens_used=1234,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _persist(outbox: Path, proposal: SavingsProposal, run_id: str) -> str:
|
|
"""Persist an outbox pair for ``proposal`` and return its join key (verdict_id)."""
|
|
persist_outbox(outbox, run=_run(proposal), provenance=_provenance(), run_id=run_id)
|
|
return mint_verdict_id(CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(proposal))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _drop_inbox_verdict(
|
|
inbox: Path, proposal: SavingsProposal, *, decision: str = "approved"
|
|
) -> str:
|
|
"""Author an inbox verdict for ``proposal`` (id minted the join way) and write it."""
|
|
document = VerdictDocument.from_candidate(
|
|
CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(proposal),
|
|
decision=decision,
|
|
rationale="expert judged this candidate",
|
|
description="LED retrofit for the north office",
|
|
)
|
|
write_verdict(inbox, document)
|
|
return document.id
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _snapshot(root: Path) -> dict[str, bytes]:
|
|
"""Every file byte under ``root`` keyed by relative path (missing dir → empty)."""
|
|
if not root.exists():
|
|
return {}
|
|
return {
|
|
str(path.relative_to(root)): path.read_bytes()
|
|
for path in sorted(root.rglob("*"))
|
|
if path.is_file()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the pending registry (the id-join) ------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestPendingRegistry:
|
|
"""pending_proposals: outbox proposals minus settled, joined on verdict_id."""
|
|
|
|
def test_undecided_proposal_is_listed_pending(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# Forslag uten dom → listes utestående (no inbox verdict, no promotion).
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
vid = _persist(outbox, _proposal(), run_id="r-001")
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
assert [p.verdict_id for p in pending] == [vid]
|
|
assert pending[0].run_id == "r-001"
|
|
assert pending[0].measure == "LED-retrofit"
|
|
assert pending[0].project_id == "bygg-kontor-nord"
|
|
|
|
def test_inbox_verdict_settles_the_proposal(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# LOAD-BEARING (the id-join seam). Dom i inbox → forsvinner fra pending.
|
|
# Detach point: drop the ``not in settled`` filter in pending_proposals
|
|
# so it returns every outbox proposal → this judged proposal is STILL
|
|
# listed → RED. (Restore from the implemented copy, never git checkout.)
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
proposal = _proposal()
|
|
vid = _persist(outbox, proposal, run_id="r-001")
|
|
inbox_id = _drop_inbox_verdict(inbox, proposal)
|
|
assert inbox_id == vid # the join key is shared (K5 assumption)
|
|
assert pending_proposals(outbox, inbox) == []
|
|
|
|
def test_join_is_exact_a_different_candidate_stays_pending(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# A verdict about a DIFFERENT candidate must not settle this one — the
|
|
# join is by exact id, never a coincidental match.
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
vid = _persist(outbox, _proposal(), run_id="r-001")
|
|
_drop_inbox_verdict(inbox, _proposal(measure="HVAC-upgrade", code="EL-99"))
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
assert [p.verdict_id for p in pending] == [vid]
|
|
|
|
def test_skipped_inbox_decision_does_not_settle(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# §4.2 vocabulary: an inbox verdict with an unknown decision is SKIPPED by
|
|
# load_inbox → never reaches the store → must NOT settle the proposal.
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
proposal = _proposal()
|
|
vid = _persist(outbox, proposal, run_id="r-001")
|
|
inbox.mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
bogus_id = mint_verdict_id(CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(proposal))
|
|
(inbox / f"{bogus_id}.json").write_text(
|
|
json.dumps(
|
|
{
|
|
"id": bogus_id,
|
|
"decision": "maybe-later", # outside §4.2 → skipped
|
|
"rationale": "not a real decision",
|
|
"proposal_features": {
|
|
"affected_codes": ["EL-01"],
|
|
"measure_type": "LED-retrofit",
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 20000.0,
|
|
"description": "x",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
assert [p.verdict_id for p in pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)] == [vid]
|
|
|
|
def test_multiple_proposals_deterministic_order(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="m-b", code="EL-02"), run_id="r-002")
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="m-a", code="EL-01"), run_id="r-001")
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
assert [p.run_id for p in pending] == ["r-001", "r-002"] # sorted by run_id
|
|
|
|
def test_missing_outbox_dir_is_empty(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
assert pending_proposals(tmp_path / "nope", tmp_path / "inbox") == []
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestPromotedSettles:
|
|
"""A PROMOTED verdict (§6) settles a proposal too — inbox-/promotert dom."""
|
|
|
|
def test_promoted_verdict_settles_the_proposal(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox, bundle = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox", tmp_path / "bundle"
|
|
proposal = _proposal()
|
|
_persist(outbox, proposal, run_id="r-001")
|
|
# A promoted verdict lives in the bundle (context layer), carrying the
|
|
# same verdict_id in frontmatter. Promote requires an accepted decision.
|
|
bundle.mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
(bundle / "index.md").write_text("# Bundle\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
|
document = VerdictDocument.from_candidate(
|
|
CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(proposal),
|
|
decision="approved",
|
|
rationale="promoted after approval",
|
|
description="d",
|
|
)
|
|
promote(
|
|
document,
|
|
bundle,
|
|
approved_by="expert",
|
|
experiment="exp-1",
|
|
timestamp="2026-07-24",
|
|
)
|
|
# Without the bundle it is pending; WITH the bundle the promotion settles it.
|
|
assert len(pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)) == 1
|
|
assert pending_proposals(outbox, inbox, bundle_dirs=[bundle]) == []
|
|
|
|
def test_settled_ids_union_inbox_and_promoted(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
inbox, bundle = tmp_path / "inbox", tmp_path / "bundle"
|
|
a = _drop_inbox_verdict(inbox, _proposal())
|
|
bundle.mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
(bundle / "index.md").write_text("# Bundle\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
|
other = _proposal(measure="HVAC-upgrade", code="EL-99")
|
|
document = VerdictDocument.from_candidate(
|
|
CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(other),
|
|
decision="approved",
|
|
rationale="promoted",
|
|
description="d",
|
|
)
|
|
promote(document, bundle, approved_by="e", experiment="x", timestamp="2026-07-24")
|
|
ids = settled_verdict_ids(inbox, bundle_dirs=[bundle])
|
|
assert a in ids
|
|
assert document.id in ids
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the routing config (nøkkel→ekspert, schema-validated fail-fast) --------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestRoutingContract:
|
|
"""load_routing: fail-fast on a malformed routing config (§10)."""
|
|
|
|
def test_valid_config_loads(self) -> None:
|
|
routing = load_routing(
|
|
{"routes": {"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}, "default_expert": "triage"}
|
|
)
|
|
assert routing.routes["LED-retrofit"] == "energy-expert"
|
|
assert routing.default_expert == "triage"
|
|
|
|
def test_default_expert_optional(self) -> None:
|
|
routing = load_routing({"routes": {"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}})
|
|
assert routing.default_expert is None
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
|
"bad",
|
|
[
|
|
{"routes": {}}, # empty table — nobody can ever be routed
|
|
{"routes": {"LED-retrofit": ""}}, # empty expert id
|
|
{"routes": {"": "energy-expert"}}, # empty routing key
|
|
{"default_expert": "triage"}, # routes missing
|
|
{"routes": {"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}, "default_expert": ""}, # empty default
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
def test_malformed_config_fails_fast(self, bad: dict[str, object]) -> None:
|
|
with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
|
|
load_routing(bad)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestRoutePending:
|
|
"""route_pending: assign an expert per proposal by measure (config-string key)."""
|
|
|
|
def test_routes_by_measure(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="LED-retrofit"), run_id="r-001")
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
routing = RoutingContract(routes={"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"})
|
|
routed = route_pending(pending, routing)
|
|
assert [(r.proposal.run_id, r.expert) for r in routed] == [("r-001", "energy-expert")]
|
|
|
|
def test_unmatched_measure_uses_default(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="HVAC-upgrade"), run_id="r-001")
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
routing = RoutingContract(routes={"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}, default_expert="triage")
|
|
routed = route_pending(pending, routing)
|
|
assert routed[0].expert == "triage"
|
|
|
|
def test_unmatched_measure_no_default_is_unrouted(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="HVAC-upgrade"), run_id="r-001")
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
routing = RoutingContract(routes={"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"})
|
|
routed = route_pending(pending, routing)
|
|
assert routed[0].expert is None # UNROUTED — nobody configured to judge it
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the read-only invariant (LOAD-BEARING: hitl never writes) -------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestReadOnly:
|
|
"""LOAD-BEARING (§3 Step 7): hitl READS three layers, writes NONE of them."""
|
|
|
|
def test_hitl_never_writes(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# Byte-snapshot outbox + inbox before and after every read path. Detach
|
|
# point: make any read (pending/settled/route) write a byte → a snapshot
|
|
# diverges → RED. The role split forbids hitl writing the inbox (K10 does
|
|
# notification, never this).
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
proposal = _proposal()
|
|
_persist(outbox, proposal, run_id="r-001")
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(measure="HVAC-upgrade", code="EL-99"), run_id="r-002")
|
|
_drop_inbox_verdict(inbox, proposal)
|
|
before_out, before_in = _snapshot(outbox), _snapshot(inbox)
|
|
|
|
pending = pending_proposals(outbox, inbox)
|
|
route_pending(pending, RoutingContract(routes={"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}))
|
|
settled_verdict_ids(inbox)
|
|
|
|
assert _snapshot(outbox) == before_out
|
|
assert _snapshot(inbox) == before_in
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the CLI (python -m ...hitl pending|route) -----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _write_routing(path: Path) -> Path:
|
|
path.write_text(
|
|
json.dumps({"routes": {"LED-retrofit": "energy-expert"}, "default_expert": "triage"}),
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
return path
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestCli:
|
|
"""The thin CLI: pending|route subcommands, fail-fast on a bad routing file."""
|
|
|
|
def test_pending_lists_and_exits_zero(
|
|
self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(), run_id="r-001")
|
|
code = main(["pending", "--outbox", str(outbox), "--inbox", str(inbox)])
|
|
assert code == 0
|
|
assert "r-001" in capsys.readouterr().out
|
|
|
|
def test_route_lists_expert_and_exits_zero(
|
|
self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(), run_id="r-001")
|
|
routing = _write_routing(tmp_path / "routing.json")
|
|
code = main(
|
|
["route", "--outbox", str(outbox), "--inbox", str(inbox), "--routing", str(routing)]
|
|
)
|
|
assert code == 0
|
|
assert "energy-expert" in capsys.readouterr().out
|
|
|
|
def test_route_with_malformed_config_fails_fast(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
outbox, inbox = tmp_path / "outbox", tmp_path / "inbox"
|
|
_persist(outbox, _proposal(), run_id="r-001")
|
|
bad = tmp_path / "bad.json"
|
|
bad.write_text(json.dumps({"routes": {}}), encoding="utf-8")
|
|
code = main(
|
|
["route", "--outbox", str(outbox), "--inbox", str(inbox), "--routing", str(bad)]
|
|
)
|
|
assert code != 0
|
|
|
|
def test_pending_type_is_frozen(self) -> None:
|
|
# PendingProposal is an immutable value (no accidental mutation on the
|
|
# read path — reinforces the read-only invariant at the type level).
|
|
p = PendingProposal(
|
|
run_id="r", verdict_id="v", project_id="p", measure="m", claimed_saving_nok=1.0
|
|
)
|
|
with pytest.raises((AttributeError, TypeError)):
|
|
p.run_id = "other" # type: ignore[misc]
|