Oekt 17 found the class on four named files. This sweep ENUMERATES it: 42 negative substring assertions across 21 test files (STATE's "~34 across 23" was a premise -- measured, it is 42/21). Sixteen of them measured an absence without ever having shown presence; all sixteen now carry a positive control asserting the searched-for string PRESENT in the source artifact, in EXACTLY the form the negative looks for. Files touched: test_costsim, test_loop, test_okf (3 sites), test_preflight, test_run_entrance, test_s10_run_layer, test_sdk_version_guard, test_simulation (2 sites), test_step1_expel, test_step5_refine, test_step7_async_loop, test_step8_promotion, test_valuereport. VALUE-PROOF (green-without / red-with, per the oekt-17 rule that a detach proof is not a value proof). Seven source/fixture mutations, each making the negative vacuous: M1 verdict fixture loses the realization signal VALUE-PROVEN M2 decoy fixture loses its text VALUE-PROVEN M3 renderer stops emitting typed section headings VALUE-PROVEN M4 promotion stops writing the marker VALUE-PROVEN (pass 2) M5 fold stops rendering the realization surface VALUE-PROVEN M6 report stops labelling the cost section VALUE-PROVEN M7 preflight stops importing the SDK VALUE-PROVEN M4 needed pass 2: a PRECEDING assertion caught the same mutation, hiding the new control behind it -- the oekt-17 lesson reproduced. The remaining nine controls are vacuity guards (non-emptiness / form-presence) whose mutation would have to break the source artificially; they are stated as guards, not claimed as value-proven. MEASURED FINDING (test_loop): the FIRST-RUN-MARKER negative cannot be given a positive control at all. Within a run only the CHECKER's critique is fed back -- the proposer's own prior reasoning crosses no prompt boundary, not even within a run. So that negative holds trivially. Left in place with the limitation stated in the test rather than dressed up as a controlled seam; the CRITIQUE negative beside it IS controlled and is the real seam. Mutations were in-place on src/ and shared/ with original bytes restored and sha-verified; git status clean before and after. Suite 688 -> 688 (assertions added inside existing tests, no new test cases). ruff + mypy --strict green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Vc5PmZGjwuJypdhzKnJa5
176 lines
8 KiB
Python
176 lines
8 KiB
Python
"""SDK version guard (C2.5, closes C-N3) — LOAD-BEARING (§11).
|
|
|
|
The seam this file keeps alive: every SDK attribute premise in
|
|
``sdk_client.py`` was verified against a CONCRETE version range
|
|
(0.2.110 read at source level, release notes through 0.2.120; sdk-review
|
|
2026-07-16). The pin ``claude-agent-sdk>=0.2.111,<0.3`` freezes that range —
|
|
this guard makes an upgrade outside it a RED test naming exactly which
|
|
premises must be re-verified, instead of a silent behaviour drift.
|
|
|
|
Offline-safe: reads installed package metadata only — no key, no network.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import importlib.metadata
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
_PYPROJECT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "pyproject.toml"
|
|
|
|
# The verified range — MUST match the pyproject pin (bound below).
|
|
_VERIFIED_FLOOR = (0, 2, 111)
|
|
_VERIFIED_CEILING = (0, 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _pin_for(floor: tuple[int, ...], ceiling: tuple[int, ...]) -> str:
|
|
"""The pyproject requirement string the verified range implies.
|
|
|
|
DERIVED, never a third hand-maintained copy: the range this guard enforces and
|
|
the pin it asserts on cannot drift apart, because moving the range moves the
|
|
expected pin with it (value-proof below).
|
|
"""
|
|
low = ".".join(str(part) for part in floor)
|
|
high = ".".join(str(part) for part in ceiling)
|
|
return f"claude-agent-sdk>={low},<{high}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
_PIN = _pin_for(_VERIFIED_FLOOR, _VERIFIED_CEILING)
|
|
|
|
# The sdk_client.py attribute premises the verified range vouches for
|
|
# (sdk-review 2026-07-16, verified against package source through 0.2.120).
|
|
_SDK_PREMISES = (
|
|
"AssistantMessage.error/.model/.content",
|
|
"ResultMessage.usage/.total_cost_usd/.is_error/.subtype/.errors",
|
|
"ClaudeAgentOptions.max_budget_usd/.setting_sources/.system_prompt/.max_turns/.model/.tools",
|
|
"TextBlock.text",
|
|
"query() yields AssistantMessage then a closing ResultMessage",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _parse(raw: str) -> tuple[int, ...]:
|
|
return tuple(int(part) for part in raw.split(".")[:3])
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _dependencies_block(text: str) -> str:
|
|
"""The ``dependencies = [...]`` array of a pyproject, as text (ANCHOR).
|
|
|
|
Fail-closed: a pyproject that no longer declares the array raises rather than
|
|
returning "" — a silently empty anchor would make every assertion below vacuous
|
|
(the degeneration mode measured on the §12 guard).
|
|
"""
|
|
start = text.find("dependencies = [")
|
|
if start == -1:
|
|
raise ValueError("pyproject declares no 'dependencies = [' array — anchor lost")
|
|
end = text.find("]", start)
|
|
if end == -1:
|
|
raise ValueError("pyproject 'dependencies' array is unterminated — anchor lost")
|
|
return text[start : end + 1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _pin_is_declared(text: str, pin: str) -> bool:
|
|
"""True when ``pin`` is a real runtime dependency — not merely present somewhere.
|
|
|
|
Two narrowings, each one a measured degeneration rather than a precaution:
|
|
``pin in text`` was GREEN while the real dependency had drifted below the
|
|
verified floor and the literal survived in a trailing comment (measured
|
|
2026-07-31), so the match is scoped to the anchor AND requires the QUOTED
|
|
form with comments stripped — a comment sits inside the array too, so the
|
|
slice alone still does not detach.
|
|
"""
|
|
body = "\n".join(line.split("#", 1)[0] for line in _dependencies_block(text).splitlines())
|
|
return f'"{pin}"' in body
|
|
|
|
|
|
def check_sdk_version() -> str:
|
|
"""Fail if the installed SDK is outside the verified range — naming the premises."""
|
|
raw = importlib.metadata.version("claude-agent-sdk")
|
|
if not (_VERIFIED_FLOOR <= _parse(raw) < _VERIFIED_CEILING):
|
|
raise AssertionError(
|
|
f"claude-agent-sdk {raw} is OUTSIDE the verified range "
|
|
f"{_PIN.removeprefix('claude-agent-sdk')}. "
|
|
"Re-verify the sdk_client.py attribute premises against the new version "
|
|
"BEFORE widening the pin (pyproject.toml + this guard together): "
|
|
+ "; ".join(_SDK_PREMISES)
|
|
)
|
|
return raw
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestSdkVersionGuard:
|
|
def test_the_installed_sdk_is_within_the_verified_range(self) -> None:
|
|
assert check_sdk_version() == importlib.metadata.version("claude-agent-sdk")
|
|
|
|
def test_a_version_above_the_ceiling_trips_the_guard(
|
|
self, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(importlib.metadata, "version", lambda name: "0.3.0")
|
|
with pytest.raises(AssertionError) as err:
|
|
check_sdk_version()
|
|
message = str(err.value)
|
|
assert "sdk_client.py" in message
|
|
for premise in _SDK_PREMISES:
|
|
assert premise in message
|
|
|
|
def test_a_version_below_the_floor_trips_the_guard(
|
|
self, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
# 0.2.110 works but misses the 0.2.111 read-loop fixes (NDJSON
|
|
# whitespace on >64 KiB lines, plain-string content TypeError,
|
|
# zombie subprocess on cancellation) — below the floor is unverified.
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(importlib.metadata, "version", lambda name: "0.2.110")
|
|
with pytest.raises(AssertionError):
|
|
check_sdk_version()
|
|
|
|
def test_the_pyproject_pin_matches_the_verified_range(self) -> None:
|
|
# The seam: what uv installs and what this guard vouches for are ONE range.
|
|
assert _pin_is_declared(_PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), _PIN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestTheSeamGoesRedWhenDetached:
|
|
"""LOAD-BEARING (§11): the assertions above must FAIL on a detached pyproject.
|
|
|
|
Red-proofs run against a mutated COPY of the pyproject text — never against
|
|
``pyproject.toml`` itself. Each one is a former manual spot-check made permanent:
|
|
a detach-proof that dies with the session is not a proof.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def test_red_when_the_pin_survives_only_outside_the_dependencies_block(self) -> None:
|
|
# The MEASURED degeneration: the real dependency drops below the verified
|
|
# floor while the exact pin string lives on in a trailing comment. The
|
|
# unanchored `_PIN in text` assertion stayed GREEN through exactly this.
|
|
text = _PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
mutated = text.replace(f'"{_PIN}",', f'"claude-agent-sdk>=0.2.110,<0.3", # was: {_PIN}')
|
|
assert mutated != text, "mutation did not apply — the red-proof would be vacuous"
|
|
assert _PIN in mutated, "the literal must survive, or this proves the wrong thing"
|
|
assert not _pin_is_declared(mutated, _PIN)
|
|
|
|
def test_red_when_the_verified_floor_drifts_from_the_pin(self) -> None:
|
|
# VALUE-proof, not merely a detach-proof: moving the range this guard
|
|
# enforces moves the pin it demands, so the two cannot part company.
|
|
drifted = _pin_for((0, 2, 110), _VERIFIED_CEILING)
|
|
assert drifted != _PIN
|
|
assert not _pin_is_declared(_PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), drifted)
|
|
|
|
def test_red_when_the_verified_ceiling_drifts_from_the_pin(self) -> None:
|
|
drifted = _pin_for(_VERIFIED_FLOOR, (0, 4))
|
|
assert drifted != _PIN
|
|
assert not _pin_is_declared(_PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), drifted)
|
|
|
|
def test_the_anchor_is_fail_closed_when_the_array_is_renamed(self) -> None:
|
|
# An anchor that degenerates to "" would make every assertion above vacuous.
|
|
text = _PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8").replace("dependencies = [", "deps = [")
|
|
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="anchor lost"):
|
|
_dependencies_block(text)
|
|
|
|
def test_the_anchor_does_not_degenerate_to_the_whole_file(self) -> None:
|
|
# Mutate the ANCHOR itself: a slice that silently widened to the entire
|
|
# pyproject would re-admit the substring-anywhere defect unnoticed.
|
|
text = _PYPROJECT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
block = _dependencies_block(text)
|
|
# Positive control: the marker EXISTS in the whole file, in exactly the form the
|
|
# negative searches for — otherwise "absent from the slice" would hold for a
|
|
# pyproject that never had a [project] table to be excluded.
|
|
assert "[project]" in text
|
|
assert len(block) < len(text)
|
|
assert "[project]" not in block
|