Point 2 of the sweep, enumerated rather than assumed. STATE's total was right and
its distribution was not: 86 hits confirmed (`assert not X` 41 / `== []` 42 /
`== {}` 2 / `== set()` 1), but per file measured `test_cli_paritet` 13 (STATE said
19), `test_preflight` 10 (11), `test_step7` 4 (6).
AST triage split the 86: 55 hits sit in 50 tests whose assertions are ALL
negative; the other 31 already have a positive sibling assert in the same test.
Two negative results worth recording, because they bound the remaining work:
- The `test_preflight` "clears" family (`_check_credentials(...) == []` and
friends) is NOT vacuous. Each sits beside a sibling in the same class that
asserts refusals are non-empty, so a no-op checker turns the sibling red.
Class-level pairing is a real control; these need no change.
- `test_method_spec_loadbearing.py` already models the right pattern for
detectors — explicit `test_guard_red_when_*` red-proofs against a mutated COPY.
This commit fixes the class that had no control at all: static/AST guards that
assert an absence without ever showing the scanner can detect a presence.
1. TAUTOLOGICAL RED-PROOFS (both spec guards). `test_guard_red_when_spec_missing`
asserted a file is absent from a fresh `tmp_path` — true by construction of the
fixture, and it never called the guard it is named for. It would have stayed
green with `test_spec_is_present` deleted outright. Both now exercise the same
`_spec_is_present` predicate the guard calls, in both directions.
2. MISSING RED-PROOF. `test_spec_keeps_structure_markers` had none, unlike its
toolkit and contract-field siblings: with `_STRUCTURE_MARKERS` emptied or
`_missing_markers` stubbed to `[]` it reported green forever. Added
`test_guard_red_when_marker_removed`, parametrized over all 21 markers.
3. BLIND IMPORT SCANNERS (costsim x2, okf, preflight, notify). Every one asserted
`not names & {forbidden}` or `outside == set()` with nothing showing `names`
was non-empty — an empty scan satisfies them exactly as well as real purity.
`test_okf_is_pure_stdlib`'s subset check is likewise trivially true of the
empty set, so it did not guard its neighbour either. Each now asserts a
known-present module first. The notify guard gets the strongest form
available: it proves the detector DOES match a network import inside the seam,
so the matcher itself is shown to work rather than only its silence.
Value-proved, not merely detach-proved. Seven vacuity mutations run against the
NEW tests: all seven RED, each dying on the intended control line. The same
mutations run against the PRE-CHANGE tests (session edits stashed): all five
applicable ones GREEN — blind to the vacuity they were meant to catch. Green
before, red after, same mutation, is the value-proof.
Harness held original bytes in memory, restored in `finally`, sha256-verified
every restore, and checked each run ACTUALLY RAN (a wrong test id yields rc!=0
and mimics red). `git status` clean before and after.
Remaining in the class and NOT closed here: ~45 all-negative tests, mostly CLI
refusal (`calls == []` after a refused invocation) and empty-default
(`missing dir -> []`). Listed in STATE, not silently dropped.
Suite 690 -> 711.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DJmse16bEkaSBtvXhncEUc
187 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
187 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
"""Spec-integrity seam for the method spec (method-spec §11, row "Spec integrity").
|
|
|
|
The sibling of ``test_ingest_spec_loadbearing.py``: this repo is built from
|
|
``shared/method-spec.md`` alone (pulled unchanged from commons), and this test keeps that
|
|
contract honest — it goes RED when the spec goes missing, names a concrete agent toolkit
|
|
(the framework-neutrality rule), loses a structural section/step marker, or stops
|
|
documenting a contract field this implementation consumes (§12 completeness).
|
|
|
|
Precision note (lesson from the ingest guard's detach spot-check): a substring-anywhere
|
|
assertion does not detach when only the §12 table row is removed but the field is still
|
|
mentioned in running text. The field assertions here are therefore scoped to the §12
|
|
cross-check block and require the backticked form, so removing a table row alone turns
|
|
the guard red. All assertions are presence-only (no forbidden-new-sections semantics),
|
|
so a commons amendment that ADDS sections or fields keeps the guard green.
|
|
|
|
Red-proofs run against a mutated COPY of the spec in ``tmp_path`` — never against
|
|
``shared/`` itself.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
SPEC = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "method-spec.md"
|
|
|
|
# Concrete agent toolkits / vendor stacks the framework-neutral spec MUST NOT name
|
|
# (same list as the ingest-spec guard).
|
|
_FORBIDDEN_TOOLKITS = (
|
|
"claude",
|
|
"anthropic",
|
|
"openai",
|
|
"gpt",
|
|
"gemini",
|
|
"llama",
|
|
"langchain",
|
|
"autogen",
|
|
"crewai",
|
|
"semantic kernel",
|
|
"microsoft agent framework",
|
|
"agent sdk",
|
|
"bedrock",
|
|
"vertex",
|
|
"foundry",
|
|
"maf",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Structural markers the spec must keep: the twelve normative sections, the eight loop
|
|
# steps, and RFC 2119 normative language.
|
|
_STRUCTURE_MARKERS = tuple(
|
|
[f"## {n}." for n in range(1, 13)] + [f"### Step {n}" for n in range(1, 9)] + ["MUST"]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Every §12 contract field this implementation consumes (src-consumed per the 2026-07-16
|
|
# review's consume-list; the last four — outcome, modelled_saving_nok, gap_source,
|
|
# context_key — are golden/test-consumed only, guarded all the same).
|
|
_CONTRACT_FIELDS = (
|
|
"decision",
|
|
"marker",
|
|
"rationale",
|
|
"id",
|
|
"proposal_features",
|
|
"affected_codes",
|
|
"measure_type",
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok",
|
|
"description",
|
|
"project_id",
|
|
"measure",
|
|
"affected_items",
|
|
"code",
|
|
"quantity",
|
|
"unit_cost",
|
|
"assumptions",
|
|
"validates",
|
|
"nominal_feasible",
|
|
"p10",
|
|
"p50",
|
|
"p90",
|
|
"realization_rate",
|
|
"expected_actual_saving_nok",
|
|
"type",
|
|
"approved",
|
|
"rejected",
|
|
"approved_with_adjustment",
|
|
"outcome",
|
|
"modelled_saving_nok",
|
|
"gap_source",
|
|
"context_key",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _named_toolkits(text: str) -> list[str]:
|
|
low = text.lower()
|
|
return [tok for tok in _FORBIDDEN_TOOLKITS if tok in low]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _missing_markers(text: str) -> list[str]:
|
|
return [marker for marker in _STRUCTURE_MARKERS if marker not in text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _section12_block(text: str) -> str:
|
|
start = text.find("## 12.")
|
|
if start == -1:
|
|
return ""
|
|
end = text.find("\n## ", start + 1)
|
|
return text[start:] if end == -1 else text[start:end]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _undocumented_fields(text: str) -> list[str]:
|
|
block = _section12_block(text)
|
|
return [field for field in _CONTRACT_FIELDS if f"`{field}`" not in block]
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- The guard itself (against the real spec) ---------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _spec_is_present(path: Path) -> bool:
|
|
"""The presence predicate itself, so the red-proof can exercise THE SAME one."""
|
|
return path.is_file()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_spec_is_present() -> None:
|
|
# RED if the spec goes missing (the method stops being implementable from spec alone).
|
|
assert _spec_is_present(SPEC), "method-spec.md missing — subtree pull the commons contract"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_spec_keeps_structure_markers() -> None:
|
|
missing = _missing_markers(SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
|
assert not missing, f"structural markers gone from the spec: {missing}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_spec_names_no_agent_toolkit() -> None:
|
|
present = _named_toolkits(SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
|
assert not present, f"framework-neutral spec names a concrete toolkit: {present}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("field", _CONTRACT_FIELDS)
|
|
def test_spec_documents_contract_field(field: str) -> None:
|
|
undocumented = _undocumented_fields(SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
|
assert field not in undocumented, (
|
|
f"contract field {field!r} is no longer documented (backticked) in the §12 block"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- Red-proofs: the guard MUST fail on a detached spec (mutated copy, never shared/) --
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_guard_red_when_spec_missing(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# Was VACUOUS: it asserted a file is absent from a fresh ``tmp_path`` — true by
|
|
# construction of the fixture, and it never touched the guard it is named for.
|
|
# It would have stayed green with ``test_spec_is_present`` deleted outright.
|
|
# Now it exercises THE SAME predicate the guard calls, both directions.
|
|
# Positive control first: without it, "False for a missing path" would also
|
|
# hold for a predicate that is False for everything.
|
|
assert _spec_is_present(SPEC)
|
|
assert not _spec_is_present(tmp_path / "method-spec.md")
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("marker", _STRUCTURE_MARKERS)
|
|
def test_guard_red_when_marker_removed(tmp_path: Path, marker: str) -> None:
|
|
# The structure-marker guard had NO red-proof, unlike its toolkit and
|
|
# contract-field siblings: with ``_STRUCTURE_MARKERS`` emptied or
|
|
# ``_missing_markers`` stubbed to ``[]``, it would report green forever.
|
|
# Positive control: the REAL spec is missing no marker, so the detection
|
|
# below is the mutation being caught, not a spec that was already broken.
|
|
assert _missing_markers(SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8")) == []
|
|
mutated = SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8").replace(marker, "")
|
|
assert marker in _missing_markers(mutated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("toolkit", _FORBIDDEN_TOOLKITS)
|
|
def test_guard_red_when_toolkit_injected(tmp_path: Path, toolkit: str) -> None:
|
|
mutated = SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8") + f"\n\nBuilt on {toolkit}.\n"
|
|
copy = tmp_path / "method-spec.md"
|
|
copy.write_text(mutated, encoding="utf-8")
|
|
assert toolkit in _named_toolkits(copy.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("field", _CONTRACT_FIELDS)
|
|
def test_guard_red_when_field_removed_from_section12(tmp_path: Path, field: str) -> None:
|
|
text = SPEC.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
block = _section12_block(text)
|
|
mutated = text.replace(block, block.replace(f"`{field}`", ""))
|
|
copy = tmp_path / "method-spec.md"
|
|
copy.write_text(mutated, encoding="utf-8")
|
|
assert field in _undocumented_fields(copy.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|