portfolio-optimiser-claude/tests/test_step1_expel_loadbearing.py
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 30ba68a703 test(loadbearing): close the vacuous-negative class across the whole suite
Oekt 17 found the class on four named files. This sweep ENUMERATES it: 42 negative
substring assertions across 21 test files (STATE's "~34 across 23" was a premise --
measured, it is 42/21). Sixteen of them measured an absence without ever having
shown presence; all sixteen now carry a positive control asserting the searched-for
string PRESENT in the source artifact, in EXACTLY the form the negative looks for.

Files touched: test_costsim, test_loop, test_okf (3 sites), test_preflight,
test_run_entrance, test_s10_run_layer, test_sdk_version_guard, test_simulation
(2 sites), test_step1_expel, test_step5_refine, test_step7_async_loop,
test_step8_promotion, test_valuereport.

VALUE-PROOF (green-without / red-with, per the oekt-17 rule that a detach proof is
not a value proof). Seven source/fixture mutations, each making the negative vacuous:

  M1 verdict fixture loses the realization signal        VALUE-PROVEN
  M2 decoy fixture loses its text                        VALUE-PROVEN
  M3 renderer stops emitting typed section headings      VALUE-PROVEN
  M4 promotion stops writing the marker                  VALUE-PROVEN (pass 2)
  M5 fold stops rendering the realization surface        VALUE-PROVEN
  M6 report stops labelling the cost section             VALUE-PROVEN
  M7 preflight stops importing the SDK                   VALUE-PROVEN

M4 needed pass 2: a PRECEDING assertion caught the same mutation, hiding the new
control behind it -- the oekt-17 lesson reproduced. The remaining nine controls are
vacuity guards (non-emptiness / form-presence) whose mutation would have to break
the source artificially; they are stated as guards, not claimed as value-proven.

MEASURED FINDING (test_loop): the FIRST-RUN-MARKER negative cannot be given a
positive control at all. Within a run only the CHECKER's critique is fed back --
the proposer's own prior reasoning crosses no prompt boundary, not even within a
run. So that negative holds trivially. Left in place with the limitation stated in
the test rather than dressed up as a controlled seam; the CRITIQUE negative beside
it IS controlled and is the real seam.

Mutations were in-place on src/ and shared/ with original bytes restored and
sha-verified; git status clean before and after. Suite 688 -> 688 (assertions added
inside existing tests, no new test cases). ruff + mypy --strict green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Vc5PmZGjwuJypdhzKnJa5
2026-07-31 21:39:28 +02:00

253 lines
10 KiB
Python

"""Step-1 experience fold (ExpeL) — LOAD-BEARING (method-spec §3 Step 1, §11).
The seam this file keeps alive: a prior verdict reaches the next hypothesis prompt
ONLY via seed → store → structural retrieval → fold. The realization marker test is
RED when the fold is detached; the empty-store control proves the fold is what
changes the outcome signal.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
import pytest
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.experience import (
CandidateFeatures,
VerdictRecord,
VerdictStore,
fold_experience,
mint_verdict_id,
seed_store_from_bundle,
similarity,
)
from portfolio_optimiser_claude.ir import load_validator_input
BUNDLE = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples" / "bygg-energi-mikro"
BASE_PROMPT = "Propose exactly one cost-saving measure for this project."
def _features(
codes: frozenset[str] = frozenset({"A", "B"}),
measure_type: str = "M",
claimed: float = 30_000.0,
) -> CandidateFeatures:
return CandidateFeatures(
affected_codes=codes, measure_type=measure_type, claimed_saving_nok=claimed
)
def _record(
verdict_id: str,
features: CandidateFeatures,
decision: str = "approved",
rationale: str = "fine",
) -> VerdictRecord:
return VerdictRecord(
verdict_id=verdict_id, decision=decision, rationale=rationale, features=features
)
@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
def golden_surface() -> dict[str, Any]:
raw: dict[str, Any] = json.loads((BUNDLE / "golden.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
surface: dict[str, Any] = raw["learning_surface"]
return surface
@pytest.fixture()
def seeded_store() -> VerdictStore:
store = VerdictStore()
seed_store_from_bundle(store, BUNDLE)
return store
class TestSeedFromBundle:
"""§3 Step 1: every navigable ``type: verdict`` file becomes a store entry."""
def test_shared_bundle_seeds_one_verdict(self, seeded_store: VerdictStore) -> None:
assert len(seeded_store) == 1
def test_seed_carries_decision_and_learning_fields(
self, seeded_store: VerdictStore, golden_surface: dict[str, Any]
) -> None:
# The rationale is the carrier of the learning signal: description plus
# the structured learning fields, anchored to the golden learning surface.
features = CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(load_validator_input(BUNDLE))
(record,) = seeded_store.retrieve(features, k=1)
assert record.decision == "approved_with_adjustment"
marker = (
f"[realiseringsgrad={golden_surface['realization_rate']}; "
f"forventet_faktisk_NOK={golden_surface['expected_actual_saving_nok']}]"
)
assert marker in record.rationale
assert "ekspert-dom" in record.rationale # the description prose survives
def test_seed_decision_defaults_to_approved(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
_make_micro_bundle(
tmp_path, index_links=["v.md"], verdict="---\ntype: verdict\ntitle: V\n---\nBody."
)
store = VerdictStore()
seed_store_from_bundle(store, tmp_path)
features = CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(load_validator_input(tmp_path))
(record,) = store.retrieve(features, k=1)
assert record.decision == "approved"
def test_unlinked_verdict_file_is_unreachable(self, tmp_path: Path) -> None:
# §6: navigation follows only index cross-links — an unlinked verdict
# file must not seed the store.
_make_micro_bundle(
tmp_path, index_links=[], verdict="---\ntype: verdict\ntitle: V\n---\nBody."
)
store = VerdictStore()
seed_store_from_bundle(store, tmp_path)
assert len(store) == 0
class TestStructuralRanking:
"""§3 Step 1: ranking is structural, never textual — frozen weights."""
def test_identical_features_score_one(self) -> None:
assert similarity(_features(), _features()) == pytest.approx(1.0)
def test_weights_decompose_per_spec(self) -> None:
base = _features()
# Disjoint code sets, same type, same magnitude bucket → 0.25 + 0.15.
disjoint = _features(codes=frozenset({"X"}))
assert similarity(base, disjoint) == pytest.approx(0.40)
# Same codes, different type, same bucket → 0.60 + 0.15.
other_type = _features(measure_type="OTHER")
assert similarity(base, other_type) == pytest.approx(0.75)
# Same codes, same type, different magnitude bucket → 0.60 + 0.25.
other_bucket = _features(claimed=150_000.0)
assert similarity(base, other_bucket) == pytest.approx(0.85)
def test_jaccard_of_two_empty_sets_is_one(self) -> None:
a = _features(codes=frozenset())
b = _features(codes=frozenset())
assert similarity(a, b) == pytest.approx(1.0)
def test_magnitude_buckets_are_the_frozen_edges(self) -> None:
# [0, 1e5), [1e5, 5e5), [5e5, 1e6), [1e6, ∞) — boundary values fall right.
for claimed, other, same in (
(99_999.0, 5_000.0, True),
(99_999.0, 100_000.0, False),
(100_000.0, 499_999.0, True),
(500_000.0, 999_999.0, True),
(999_999.0, 1_000_000.0, False),
(1_000_000.0, 9e9, True),
):
got = similarity(_features(claimed=claimed), _features(claimed=other))
assert got == pytest.approx(1.0 if same else 0.85), (claimed, other)
def test_surface_text_never_contributes(self) -> None:
# Two records differing ONLY in rationale text rank identically —
# deterministic tie-break is by verdict id ascending.
store = VerdictStore()
store.add(_record("bbb", _features(), rationale="LED retrofit — perfect match text"))
store.add(_record("aaa", _features(), rationale="unrelated prose"))
ranked = store.retrieve(_features(), k=2)
assert [r.verdict_id for r in ranked] == ["aaa", "bbb"]
def test_top_k_by_similarity(self) -> None:
store = VerdictStore()
store.add(_record("far", _features(codes=frozenset({"X"}), measure_type="OTHER")))
store.add(_record("near", _features()))
assert [r.verdict_id for r in store.retrieve(_features(), k=1)] == ["near"]
def test_k_must_be_positive(self) -> None:
store = VerdictStore()
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
store.retrieve(_features(), k=0)
class TestStoreSemantics:
"""§4.2: the in-memory store is FIRST-write-wins per id (idempotent merges)."""
def test_first_write_wins_per_id(self) -> None:
store = VerdictStore()
store.add(_record("same-id", _features(), rationale="first"))
store.add(_record("same-id", _features(), rationale="second"))
assert len(store) == 1
(record,) = store.retrieve(_features(), k=1)
assert record.rationale == "first"
class TestIdMinting:
"""§4.2: the id keys on the candidate measure, not the verdict event."""
def test_structurally_identical_candidates_share_an_id(self) -> None:
a = _features(codes=frozenset({"B", "A"}))
b = _features(codes=frozenset({"A", "B"}))
minted = mint_verdict_id(a)
assert minted == mint_verdict_id(b)
assert len(minted) == 16
assert set(minted) <= set("0123456789abcdef")
def test_number_formatting_participates_in_the_hash(self) -> None:
# 30000 vs 30000.0 differ — the reason loaded ids are kept verbatim.
as_int = _features(claimed=30_000)
as_float = _features(claimed=30_000.0)
assert mint_verdict_id(as_int) != mint_verdict_id(as_float)
class TestExperienceFold:
"""LOAD-BEARING (§11): the realization marker reaches the prompt via the fold."""
def test_realization_marker_reaches_the_hypothesis_prompt(
self, seeded_store: VerdictStore, golden_surface: dict[str, Any]
) -> None:
# Seed → store → structural retrieval → fold: the expert's realization
# correction must reach the next hypothesis prompt. RED when the fold is
# detached (nothing prepended) or seeding drops the learning fields.
features = CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(load_validator_input(BUNDLE))
prompt = fold_experience(seeded_store, features, BASE_PROMPT, k=3)
assert f"realiseringsgrad={golden_surface['realization_rate']}" in prompt
assert prompt.endswith(BASE_PROMPT) # prepended, never replacing the task
def test_fold_lines_carry_id_decision_and_rationale(self, seeded_store: VerdictStore) -> None:
features = CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(load_validator_input(BUNDLE))
(record,) = seeded_store.retrieve(features, k=1)
prompt = fold_experience(seeded_store, features, BASE_PROMPT, k=1)
for part in (record.verdict_id, record.decision, record.rationale):
assert part in prompt
def test_empty_store_control_changes_the_outcome_signal(
self, seeded_store: VerdictStore, golden_surface: dict[str, Any]
) -> None:
# Control (§11): with an empty store the prompt is the unchanged base —
# no marker, no verdict lines. The fold is what makes the difference.
features = CandidateFeatures.from_proposal(load_validator_input(BUNDLE))
unfolded = fold_experience(VerdictStore(), features, BASE_PROMPT, k=3)
folded = fold_experience(seeded_store, features, BASE_PROMPT, k=3)
surface = f"realiseringsgrad={golden_surface['realization_rate']}"
assert unfolded == BASE_PROMPT
# Positive control: the FOLDED prompt carries the surface in EXACTLY the form the
# negative searches for — so its absence from `unfolded` is the empty store's
# doing, not a surface that is never rendered in that shape at all.
assert surface in folded
assert surface not in unfolded
assert folded != unfolded
def _make_micro_bundle(tmp_path: Path, index_links: list[str], verdict: str) -> None:
links = " ".join(f"[{name}]({name})" for name in index_links)
(tmp_path / "index.md").write_text(
f"---\ntype: index\ntitle: Micro\n---\nSummary. {links}\n", encoding="utf-8"
)
(tmp_path / "v.md").write_text(verdict, encoding="utf-8")
(tmp_path / "validator-input.json").write_text(
json.dumps(
{
"project_id": "P1",
"measure": "M",
"affected_items": [{"code": "A", "quantity": 10, "unit_cost": 100.0}],
"claimed_saving_nok": 300,
"assumptions": {},
}
),
encoding="utf-8",
)