Kjell Tore Guttormsen
4dcdd8017a
The S5.4 analog: every run/portfolio pass can produce a deterministic value report — modelled → expert-corrected → realized, goal progress, a quantified learning effect, cost against value — with no model call, no clock and no new state. It is a PURE PROJECTION over what is already persisted (K5 outbox pairs, §4.2 inbox verdicts, K1 ledger), joined on the verdict_id K5 mints. The honesty rule (§1) sets the shape, not the layout: - approved -> the claim stands (quantified) - rejected -> the claim is void, 0 (quantified — an earned zero) - approved_with_adjustment -> §4.2 carries NO adjusted amount, so the corrected value is UNQUANTIFIED, never back-filled with the claim - no verdict -> realized is UNMARKED, never zero-that-reads-as-judged and never the modelled figure Partial quantification is counted in the output (2 of 4 …, 2 UNMARKED) rather than summed into a full-looking total. Learning is measured, not asserted: a rising approval share is reported only alongside the modelled→corrected gap that shrank behind it, over cohorts split by run_id order. Cost (USD, a K6 upper bound) and value (NOK) sit side by side and are never divided — no sourced FX rate exists here, and a ratio would invent one. Surfaces: standalone CLI (valuereport) and an opt-in --value-report on run.py, which requires --outbox and is refused BEFORE any spend without one; the report is written on both run outcomes and never rewrites the run's exit code (a budget stop stays a budget stop). Six seams detach-proven RED: honesty boundary (corrected + realized), gap arithmetic, projection purity, run-seam wiring, pre-spend fail-fast, both-outcome reporting. Fixtures are COMMITTED and generated with the real primitives, so the id-join under test is genuine. Note on the purity test: it was green-but-dead in its first form. Snapshotting the committed fixture tree in place let an earlier test's stray write pre-seed the 'before' snapshot, so the detached write reproduced it byte-for-byte. Every test now projects from a per-test copy, and a pinned file-set test guards the committed tree. Found by running the detach proof — which is what §11 is for. portfolio.py is deliberately NOT wired: run_portfolio persists nothing, so there is nothing for a projection to read. Its docstring now says that instead of promising the wiring it did not get. 562 -> 584 tests green; ruff + mypy --strict clean over 27 src files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MQu2xxwedckjU56byu1aUG
29 lines
615 B
JSON
29 lines
615 B
JSON
{
|
|
"attempts": 1,
|
|
"checker_decision": "approve",
|
|
"outcome": {
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 60000.0,
|
|
"nominal_feasible": 60000.0,
|
|
"p10": 48000.0,
|
|
"p50": 60000.0,
|
|
"p90": 72000.0,
|
|
"type": "validated",
|
|
"validates": true
|
|
},
|
|
"provenance": {
|
|
"citations": [
|
|
{
|
|
"file": "tiltak-vfd.md",
|
|
"snippet": "VFD paa pumpe P-07",
|
|
"span": "L1-L4"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"model": "unknown",
|
|
"role": "proposer",
|
|
"tokens_used": 0,
|
|
"validator_decision": "validated"
|
|
},
|
|
"run_id": "run-004",
|
|
"validator_decision": "validated",
|
|
"verdict_id": "82d6e4e60ae87e14"
|
|
}
|