New fixture class for the D4 step-0 split (commons-owned; delivered into
catalog's corpus/runner). A nav-golden case is bundle in / expected-read-
context out — the shape that expresses "two conformant implementations MUST
produce an identical read-context" (method-spec §3 Step 1).
- nav-golden-hierarchy/ (positive): depth-first first-seen order, both link
forms (/ = bundle root vs relative), one segment per level, resolved-path
dedup, cycle termination, recursive verdict exclusion, missing-index binds
root alone, flat render.
- nav-golden-escape/ (negative, gate must go red): .. escapes and a
/etc/passwd root-relative trap; conformant returns only valid.md.
Both expected-read-context.md verified byte-for-byte against a conformant
navigator implementing §3 Step 1; the negative case verified to diverge
under a naive navigator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VUCuNNvnCkayuUDy2WFgeU
Cross-coordination with the marketplace OKF convention
(ktg-plugin-marketplace/catalog/docs/okf-second-brain/spec.md v0.1). The
bundle already passed the shared acceptance gate; the one spec MUST-gap was the
root index okf_version marker (spec §3). Added it.
Verified: `node catalog/scripts/okf-check.mjs <bundle>` -> okf_version: 0.1,
"OK: valid OKF bundle", exit 0. Bundle-consuming tests green (14).
Scope note (honest): portfolio-optimiser uses OKF for framework per-project
runtime knowledge, NOT the user "second brain" the marketplace convention is
scoped to. Same FORM (now conformant + gate-clean), different SCOPE. Two
recommended `resource` warnings left deliberately (spec §4 sanctions omission;
no canonical URI to assert without fabricating). The index.md frontmatter is a
known deviation from spec §6 (reserved index = no frontmatter) kept for now
because okf.py navigation classifies the index by its type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MHR8iKxJRxDiDfNw8HZmWE
Persistent dev-fixture for energieffektivisering (energiledelse/M&V), valgt for
sin lærings-overflate: gapet mellom modellert besparelse (validatoren regner) og
faktisk realisert besparelse i drift (eksperten kjenner) — det ExpeL skal lære.
Ett kontorbygg, ett LED-retrofit-tiltak. OKF-bundle (index/project/hypothesis/
methodology/reference/verdict) bærer kontekst-laget; verdict-led-fro.md koder
realiseringsgraden (RR ≈ 0,82, forankret i National Grid SBS 2010) som ExpeL-frø.
Energi mappet inn i den EKSISTERENDE kost-IR-en uendret (affected = byggets totale
energikostnad, claimed = modellert besparelse ~10 % < 30 %-cap), så validatoren
kjører som-den-er — src/ urørt. golden.json fryser de seeded percentilene; testen
beviser at fixturen er konsumerbar (validerer, ikke Rejection), ikke bare til stede.
Domenetall verifisert mot primærkilder (EVO/IPMVP, DOE/NREL UMP, CPUC, fire
evalueringsstudier); norsk energipris mot SSB Q1 2026. README + shared/README
oppdatert (eksempel finnes, ikke lenger "planned"). Suite 121/4, ruff+mypy rene.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MHR8iKxJRxDiDfNw8HZmWE
