docs: neutral wording for the reference path and the catalogue counts
Say "referansesti" for the reference-project path in the P7 note, and replace the declared-number counts of earlier example material with the shipped synthetic catalogue's own (300 prosessnr, 306 declared numbers) or a general wording. Comments, docstrings and prose only; no constant or assertion changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cdbd57cf6
commit
0b7c853f3d
7 changed files with 17 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ when the seam is detached, so the loop cannot silently degrade into theater.
|
|||
`12.1`. When a run is **unanchored** — the knowledge base ships no cost baseline, so the
|
||||
validator's stage 0 never runs — a cost code shaped like a clause number is refused unless it is
|
||||
one of the reference numbers the base itself declares (`req_number`, `prosessnr`, `seksjon` in a
|
||||
document's own frontmatter). The refusal names the denominator: *"not one of the 2765 this
|
||||
document's own frontmatter). The refusal names the denominator: *"not one of the 306 this
|
||||
knowledge base declares"*. A code the base does declare still validates, so a project priced in
|
||||
real process codes is untouched; an input that declares no reference numbers at all cannot trip
|
||||
the rule at all. `code_forms` reports the third value, `requirement`, for a code the base does
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue