docs: neutral wording for the reference path and the catalogue counts

Say "referansesti" for the reference-project path in the P7 note, and
replace the declared-number counts of earlier example material with the
shipped synthetic catalogue's own (300 prosessnr, 306 declared numbers)
or a general wording. Comments, docstrings and prose only; no constant
or assertion changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 17:32:25 +02:00
commit 0b7c853f3d
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
7 changed files with 17 additions and 16 deletions

View file

@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ toppnivå-frontmatter i minst ett av grunnlagets dokumenter" — refuse that. Me
* the requirements base declared ``seksjon: 10.4.1`` … ``10.4.4`` and ``req_number: Krav
10.4.3—2``. The bare ``10.4`` was declared NOWHERE — it is a section PREFIX;
* the process catalogue declared 2 727 ``prosessnr`` and 2 753 ``seksjon``. ``1.10.4`` was NONE of
them: it occurred once, as prose, a chapter reference into ANOTHER standard.
* ``1.10.4`` was NONE of the process catalogue's declared ``prosessnr`` and ``seksjon`` values:
it occurred once, as prose, a chapter reference into ANOTHER standard.
The ordered rule therefore fires on NEITHER of its own known positives. The COMPLEMENT fires on
BOTH, and it closes a hole ``_ground_against_input`` already admits in writing — "it fails OPEN …