open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 4 Activity

refactor(examples): replace sector-specific example material with generic, fictitious examples

Browse source 
The context sets, the packaged knowledge bases and the example bundles are
replaced by one fictitious example set about IT operations in an invented
organisation: three context sets (serverrom-2027, driftsavtale-2027 and the
two-base drift-og-avtale-2027), two synthetic knowledge bases under
src/portfolio_optimiser/data/kunnskapsbaser and two example bundles under
src/portfolio_optimiser/data/bundles. Numbers, codes and structural values in
tests and fixtures are kept; names, ids and wording change. Dated measurement
documents that only recorded runs on the replaced material are deleted.

Gate figures measured on the new set are not comparable with earlier ones.
The exclusion gate from the previous commit is green: 0 tracked files hit
outside the shared/ subtree.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 15:04:21 +02:00
commit 37547fe292
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
1147 changed files with 24138 additions and 9503 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
tests/test_unnamed_excerpt_observation_loadbearing.py
View file

@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
**The measured hole.** P9 ran ``okf check`` (0.7.0, 15 rules) over this repository's payloads and
(P11 measured the count again on 0.8.1: still 15 -- the 16th rule, ``bundle_mismatch``, is on okf
main ``7cca9e0`` and in no tag yet; ``docs/2026-09-11-p11-okf-081.md`` section 5)
got rc 0 on ``payload-n100.json`` and rc 1 on BOTH K2 payloads -- **20 findings, every one of them
``excerpt_unnamed``**: "an excerpt a reader cannot name is one an answer cannot cite, whatever its
rank (SS 8)". That diagnosis is right and it is not a solution: on po's side the same absence is
SILENT. ``_excerpt_header`` appends the ``title:`` field only ``if excerpt.title is not None`` and
says nothing otherwise, so a payload whose every excerpt is unnamed renders exactly like one whose
producer simply had nothing to add, and no surface of a run carries the difference.
main ``7cca9e0`` and in no tag yet; the ledger is ``docs/invarianter.md``)
got rc 0 on the requirements-base payload and rc 1 on BOTH K2 payloads -- **20 findings, every one
of them ``excerpt_unnamed``**: "an excerpt a reader cannot name is one an answer cannot cite,
whatever its rank (SS 8)". That diagnosis is right and it is not a solution: on po's side the same
absence is SILENT. ``_excerpt_header`` appends the ``title:`` field only ``if excerpt.title is not
None`` and says nothing otherwise, so a payload whose every excerpt is unnamed renders exactly like
one whose producer simply had nothing to add, and no surface of a run carries the difference.
**F1 (reporting), not F2 (refusing) -- and the price of F2 is a NUMBER.** Making ``title``
required and refusing in ``check_payload_shape`` would reverse a written decision: