docs: general wording for the example-base document counts
Replace the exact document counts of earlier example bases (and the per-base counts in the sources-format note) with general wording or N-of-N in prose, comments and docstrings. Percentages and numerators stay; no constant, assertion or test data changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b7c853f3d
commit
6b1046bc23
16 changed files with 56 additions and 56 deletions
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
"""P19 DEL B — a "cost code" must have a FORM when the input offers forms.
|
||||
|
||||
**The measured defect.** P18's round 2 ended with two ``validated`` proposals whose
|
||||
``affected_item`` codes were ordinary words out of a standard's prose, in 4 of the 270 and 4 of
|
||||
the 1 133 documents of the two bases they came from. This file names them by two stand-ins of the
|
||||
``affected_item`` codes were ordinary words out of a standard's prose, in 4 of a few hundred and 4
|
||||
of about a thousand documents of the two bases they came from. This file names them by two stand-ins of the
|
||||
same kind, ``nødstrømsaggregat`` and ``redundant kjøling``.
|
||||
Both are GROUNDED in P7's sense — they appear verbatim in the input, which is all that stage asks —
|
||||
and neither is INERT in P18/B1's sense, because neither is anywhere near the 5 % document share.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue