docs: general wording for the example-base document counts

Replace the exact document counts of earlier example bases (and the
per-base counts in the sources-format note) with general wording or
N-of-N in prose, comments and docstrings. Percentages and numerators
stay; no constant, assertion or test data changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 17:48:44 +02:00
commit 6b1046bc23
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
16 changed files with 56 additions and 56 deletions

View file

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
"""P19 DEL B — a "cost code" must have a FORM when the input offers forms.
**The measured defect.** P18's round 2 ended with two ``validated`` proposals whose
``affected_item`` codes were ordinary words out of a standard's prose, in 4 of the 270 and 4 of
the 1 133 documents of the two bases they came from. This file names them by two stand-ins of the
``affected_item`` codes were ordinary words out of a standard's prose, in 4 of a few hundred and 4
of about a thousand documents of the two bases they came from. This file names them by two stand-ins of the
same kind, ``nødstrømsaggregat`` and ``redundant kjøling``.
Both are GROUNDED in P7's sense — they appear verbatim in the input, which is all that stage asks —
and neither is INERT in P18/B1's sense, because neither is anywhere near the 5 % document share.