docs: general wording for the example-base document counts

Replace the exact document counts of earlier example bases (and the
per-base counts in the sources-format note) with general wording or
N-of-N in prose, comments and docstrings. Percentages and numerators
stay; no constant, assertion or test data changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 17:48:44 +02:00
commit 6b1046bc23
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
16 changed files with 56 additions and 56 deletions

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ outboxes and were this arm's known positives:
* ``1.10.4`` — the multi-base pass, on the process catalogue, ``validated``.
Both were GROUNDED in P7's sense (they occur verbatim in the input) and neither was INERT in
P18/B1's sense (``10.4`` in 12 of 274 documents, ``1.10.4`` in 1 of 2 756). Stage 0 never ran:
P18/B1's sense (``10.4`` in 12 of a few hundred documents, ``1.10.4`` in 1 of a few thousand). Stage 0 never ran:
no requirements base ships a cost baseline. Nothing in the gate could say what they are.
**THE ORDER'S OWN RULE WAS FELLED BY MEASUREMENT BEFORE ANYTHING WAS BUILT ON IT.** B1 reads: a