docs: general wording for the example-base document counts

Replace the exact document counts of earlier example bases (and the
per-base counts in the sources-format note) with general wording or
N-of-N in prose, comments and docstrings. Percentages and numerators
stay; no constant, assertion or test data changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 17:48:44 +02:00
commit 6b1046bc23
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
16 changed files with 56 additions and 56 deletions

View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
documents read lay OUTSIDE the default window, so the window had been widened, and the trace could
not say with which knob (stress round 2, finding 1; the ledger is ``docs/invarianter.md``). The
recorder kept ``name`` / ``bundle_id`` / ``path`` and nothing else. "Did the model narrow the level,
or page through it?" is the operative question about a corpus of 2 756 documents, and it was
or page through it?" is the operative question about a corpus of a few thousand documents, and it was
unanswerable from the artefact the run leaves behind.
**DEL D, and one of the two findings it fixes was WRONG AS WRITTEN.** P18's finding 4 said a