feat(p18): an identifier that stands everywhere identifies nothing
P18 parts B and C (order 20260914T105139Z).
B1 -- stage 0b. P7 made it `item.code in grounding`: plain containment over
ONE concatenated string. P16 ran it against a delivered corpus and measured
what containment cannot tell apart: the falsification arm a4-indeksregulering
put 250 000 NOK on a single cost line coded R761 -- the knowledge base's OWN
NAME, carried by all 2 756 of its concept documents -- and the whole gate
said validated (stage 0 skipped, un-anchored run; checker approve).
The grounding is now carried as the DOCUMENTS it is made of (validator.
Grounding), not as a blob. A structure and not a second argument beside the
text: the boundaries and the text are one fact, and .text is derived, so the
gate and P8's report measure the same characters. run.py composes one
document per concept file where the base is already walked; generate.
_grounding_text folds each cost line in as a one-line document.
N and A are MEASURED, not chosen (14.09, four mounted vegnormal bases):
- every must_cite ref and mandate affected_code in the four context sets --
shortest real identifier is FOUR characters (12.1, 52.1), so N = 3 sits one
below the measurement and cannot refuse anything measured;
- document frequency of every code-shaped token per base -- 1 692 distinct
and NOT ONE reaches 5 %. Highest anywhere 6/446 (1.35 %), highest a fasit
names 3/446 (0.67 %), R761 2 756/2 756 (100 %). A = 0.05 therefore sits
3.7x above the highest real token and 20x below the defect.
Length is NOT what makes the defect inert (R761 is four characters); the
share is. And a share is not a measurement without a denominator big enough
to take one (ansikt 4): one of three is 33 %, so an ABSOLUTE floor of 10
documents gates it. Highest absolute count any real identifier reaches is 6,
and every fixture in the repo is far below 10 -- which is why every pre-P18
gate is UNTOUCHED by this rule rather than exempted from it. Grounding.of
(one document) can never reach the floor by construction.
The refusal NAMES the denominator ("appears in 2756 of the 2756 documents
this run was given"), because Step 5 feeds that reason verbatim into the next
attempt's prompt: a proposer told only "ungrounded" answers with another
token of the same kind.
B2 SPIKE (measured, NOT built) FELLED the order's own alternative: option (b)
"ground in what the run OPENED" was run over P16's 16 code rows -- R761
stands in every OPENED document too, so (b) would NOT have caught the defect,
while B1 makes it inert and still grounds the real process line 65
ASFALTDEKKER (29/2756 = 1.05 %). (b) is not a substitute for B1.
C1 -- --docs-dir is optional once --bundle-dir is given (P16 FUNN 2). On the
bundle path docs_dir is never read: retrieval, the chunk tool and the "no
citable content" check all live in the road branch. Bound ONCE from
--bundle-dir, which is byte-identically what the README already tells an
operator to type by hand. NOT the "--docs-dir omvei": no such path is opened
and the road branch still refuses without a real --docs-dir (own arm).
C2 -- the judge's snippet arm counts only under citation_scope == "narrowed",
as (a) already does (PM decision, P16 s 6.2). P16's reason for (b') being
clean -- snippets are bodies while ref/title live in frontmatter, 0 of 446
n100 bodies -- holds for "Krav 4.1.2-1" but NOT for R761, where a process
number like 12.1 stands in the bodies. Under a whole-base citation list that
mark was "cited" before any model call.
tests: test_inert_identifier_loadbearing.py (7 arms; known positive is P16's
OWN artefact replayed against the base that run was given, known negative is
26 of 26 fasit references still grounding), test_docs_dir_optional_
loadbearing.py (5 arms). test_stress_judge_loadbearing.py's snippet arm split
into narrowed/whole-base -- the pair is the discriminator, same snippet, same
mark, only the scope differs. The grounding tests migrate from str to
Grounding.of (the honest reading of a caller that declared no boundaries).
Verification: uv run pytest -q 1698 passed / 5 skipped (1685 after part A,
strict superset, 0 removed). ruff check + format clean, mypy clean (38
files). Golden demo-transcript.stdout BYTE-UNCHANGED, shasum -a 1 of the
CONTENT = ea8c534773acdbe41ae68f2c55724d69aaf8be4f. No version bump, no push.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9b47e5aa62
commit
7a7c988253
11 changed files with 628 additions and 51 deletions
108
tests/test_docs_dir_optional_loadbearing.py
Normal file
108
tests/test_docs_dir_optional_loadbearing.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
|||
"""P18/C1 — ``--docs-dir`` is optional once ``--bundle-dir`` is given.
|
||||
|
||||
P16 FUNN 2: the documented stress command names the same directory twice
|
||||
(``--docs-dir <base> --bundle-dir <base>``), because single-project mode demanded ``--docs-dir``
|
||||
even on the bundle path — where it is never read. Retrieval, the chunk tool and the "no citable
|
||||
content" check all live in the ROAD branch (``run.py``); the bundle branch builds its citations
|
||||
from the navigated base. So the flag was required for a path that ignores it, and the published
|
||||
command had to satisfy the requirement by repeating itself.
|
||||
|
||||
**This is not the "--docs-dir omvei"** (feeding project documents through retrieval INSTEAD of
|
||||
ingesting them into a knowledge base), which STATE forbids and this order forbids again. No such
|
||||
path is opened: the road branch still refuses without a real ``--docs-dir``, and the value is
|
||||
bound ONCE from ``--bundle-dir`` — byte-identically what the README already tells an operator to
|
||||
type by hand, so every existing invocation, the two-flag form included, is unchanged.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import shutil
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser import run
|
||||
|
||||
_FIXTURES = Path(__file__).parent / "fixtures"
|
||||
_PRICED = _FIXTURES / "k2-prisskjema-SYNTETISK"
|
||||
_IR_PROJECTION = {
|
||||
"project_id": "K2",
|
||||
"measure": "energy_efficiency",
|
||||
"claimed_saving_nok": 1000.0,
|
||||
"affected_codes": ["01.1"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _runnable(tmp_path: Path) -> str:
|
||||
root = tmp_path / "base"
|
||||
shutil.copytree(_PRICED, root)
|
||||
(root / "validator-input.json").write_text(json.dumps(_IR_PROJECTION), encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
return str(root)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_bundle_run_needs_no_docs_dir(tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]) -> None:
|
||||
"""(a) The fix. A free dry run on ``--bundle-dir`` alone is ACCEPTED and reaches the bundle
|
||||
path — asserted on the run-config the dry run prints, not on rc alone, since rc 0 is also what
|
||||
a run that silently took the road path would return."""
|
||||
rc = run.main(["K2", "--bundle-dir", _runnable(tmp_path), "--live-dry-run"])
|
||||
|
||||
assert rc == 0
|
||||
assert "LIVE-DRY-RUN OK" in capsys.readouterr().out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_documented_two_flag_form_still_works(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""(b) The CONTROL that this is a widening, not a change. The README's form — the same
|
||||
directory twice — must be byte-for-byte as accepted as it was before."""
|
||||
base = _runnable(tmp_path)
|
||||
rc = run.main(["K2", "--docs-dir", base, "--bundle-dir", base, "--live-dry-run"])
|
||||
|
||||
assert rc == 0
|
||||
assert "LIVE-DRY-RUN OK" in capsys.readouterr().out
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_neither_flag_is_still_refused_by_name(capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]) -> None:
|
||||
"""(c) The half that must NOT be relaxed: the road path has no base to fall back to, so an
|
||||
argv naming neither is refused, and the refusal names BOTH doors rather than only the one it
|
||||
used to name."""
|
||||
rc = run.main(["K2", "--live-dry-run"])
|
||||
|
||||
assert rc == 1
|
||||
err = capsys.readouterr().err
|
||||
assert "run refused" in err and "--docs-dir" in err and "--bundle-dir" in err
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_road_path_still_requires_a_real_docs_dir(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str]
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""(d) The anti-omvei arm. With no bundle, ``--docs-dir`` is still the only door AND it is
|
||||
still read: a directory holding nothing citable is refused by the road branch's own check, so
|
||||
nothing here turns retrieval into a substitute for ingestion."""
|
||||
empty = tmp_path / "tomt"
|
||||
empty.mkdir()
|
||||
rc = run.main(["P1", "--docs-dir", str(empty), "--live-dry-run"])
|
||||
|
||||
assert rc == 1
|
||||
assert capsys.readouterr().err.strip(), "the road path must say why, not fail silently"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_bundle_value_is_bound_once_and_reaches_run_project(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path, monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""(e) The SEAM. rc 0 above would also be satisfied by a CLI that never forwarded the value, so
|
||||
the argument ``run_project`` actually receives is recorded — one binding, both dispatch sites."""
|
||||
base = _runnable(tmp_path)
|
||||
seen: dict[str, Any] = {}
|
||||
|
||||
async def _record(project_id: str, profile: Any, **kw: Any) -> Any:
|
||||
seen.update(kw)
|
||||
raise SystemExit(0)
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr("portfolio_optimiser.run.run_project", _record)
|
||||
with pytest.raises(SystemExit):
|
||||
run.main(["K2", "--bundle-dir", base, "--live-dry-run"])
|
||||
|
||||
assert seen["docs_dir"] == base == seen["bundle_dir"]
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ from portfolio_optimiser.reference_domain import CostItem, Project
|
|||
from portfolio_optimiser import run as run_mod
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.run import grounding_offer_notice, run_project
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.simulation import scripted_factory
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import Rejection
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import Grounding, Rejection
|
||||
|
||||
FIXTURES = Path(__file__).parent / "fixtures" / "p7-grounding"
|
||||
SHARED = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples"
|
||||
|
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ def test_a_delivered_input_with_no_cost_line_reports_zero() -> None:
|
|||
measured form and the run is un-anchored, so the offer is null in BOTH numbers. Without this
|
||||
control a green (b) would be satisfied by a report that always counts positive."""
|
||||
for name in ("p6-k2-generation-prompt.txt", "s7c-k2-generation-prompt.txt"):
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, _prompt(name))
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, Grounding.of(_prompt(name)))
|
||||
assert offer.identifiers == 0, (name, offer)
|
||||
assert offer.cost_lines == 0, (name, offer)
|
||||
assert offer.chars > 0, "the measurement must have had text to measure"
|
||||
|
|
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def test_the_known_positive_input_reports_a_positive_offer() -> None:
|
|||
pass (a) and look measured."""
|
||||
text = _prompt("p4-n100-generation-prompt.txt")
|
||||
assert KNOWN_POSITIVE in text, "the fixture no longer carries the known positive"
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, text)
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, Grounding.of(text))
|
||||
assert offer.identifiers > 0, offer
|
||||
assert offer.cost_lines == 0, "a road standard carries no cost lines (F4's own finding)"
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ def test_a_bare_number_is_not_counted_as_an_offer() -> None:
|
|||
"""LOAD-BEARING (b), the other half. K2 carries 46 394 bare-number occurrences over 2 117
|
||||
distinct values (P7 § 2), so counting them would make every report positive and the whole
|
||||
measurement inert — the repo's cardinal class, a gate that can only come out green."""
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, "1234 5678 90 42.5 1000000")
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(_project(), None, Grounding.of("1234 5678 90 42.5 1000000"))
|
||||
assert offer.identifiers == 0, offer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -161,12 +161,12 @@ def test_the_offer_is_measured_on_the_text_the_gate_will_see() -> None:
|
|||
composer P7's gate uses, so the report and the gate cannot describe different texts. Both of
|
||||
the composer's OTHER two sources are exercised: a project cost line and a baseline code each
|
||||
raise the count, which a report built from ``delivered`` alone cannot do."""
|
||||
delivered = "nothing citable here"
|
||||
delivered = Grounding.of("nothing citable here")
|
||||
project, baseline = _project("PRJ-77"), _baseline("BAS-88")
|
||||
|
||||
offer = grounding_offer(project, baseline, delivered)
|
||||
|
||||
assert offer.chars == len(_grounding_text(project, baseline, delivered))
|
||||
assert offer.chars == len(_grounding_text(project, baseline, delivered).text)
|
||||
assert offer.identifiers == 2, offer
|
||||
assert offer.cost_lines == 1, offer
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,12 @@ from portfolio_optimiser.ir import (
|
|||
CostBaselineLine,
|
||||
SavingsProposal,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import Rejection, ValidatedProposal, validate_proposal
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import (
|
||||
Grounding,
|
||||
Rejection,
|
||||
ValidatedProposal,
|
||||
validate_proposal,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
FIXTURES = Path(__file__).parent / "fixtures" / "p7-grounding"
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ def test_a_fabricated_code_from_a_real_recording_falls(
|
|||
text = _prompt(fixture)
|
||||
for code in codes:
|
||||
assert code not in text, f"fixture drifted: {code!r} is IN the prompt"
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal(*codes), baseline=None, grounding=text)
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal(*codes), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text))
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, Rejection), f"{codes} cleared the gate on an input that names neither"
|
||||
for code in codes:
|
||||
assert repr(code) in ruling.reason
|
||||
|
|
@ -92,7 +97,9 @@ def test_b_the_reason_names_every_ungrounded_identifier_in_the_proposal_s_own_or
|
|||
message naming only the FIRST violation reads as an instruction to fix that one field, and the
|
||||
proposer fixes one and rebreaks the other. Same ``"; "`` joiner, same PROPOSAL order."""
|
||||
text = _prompt("p6-k2-generation-prompt.txt")
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-03", "M-04-01"), baseline=None, grounding=text)
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(
|
||||
_proposal("M-04-03", "M-04-01"), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, Rejection)
|
||||
parts = ruling.reason.split("; ")
|
||||
assert len(parts) == 2, f"expected one sentence per violation, got {ruling.reason!r}"
|
||||
|
|
@ -110,7 +117,9 @@ def test_c_the_known_positive_is_not_flagged() -> None:
|
|||
is red here."""
|
||||
text = _prompt("p4-n100-generation-prompt.txt")
|
||||
assert KNOWN_POSITIVE in text, "fixture drifted: the known positive is not in the prompt"
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal(KNOWN_POSITIVE), baseline=None, grounding=text)
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(
|
||||
_proposal(KNOWN_POSITIVE), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, ValidatedProposal), getattr(ruling, "reason", "")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -120,7 +129,7 @@ def test_c_control_the_rule_can_still_flag_on_that_same_recording() -> None:
|
|||
fixture, same call — only the identifier differs, and this one must fall."""
|
||||
text = _prompt("p4-n100-generation-prompt.txt")
|
||||
assert "CRS-01" not in text
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal("CRS-01"), baseline=None, grounding=text)
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal("CRS-01"), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text))
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, Rejection)
|
||||
assert "'CRS-01'" in ruling.reason
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -134,7 +143,7 @@ def test_d_a_code_quoted_verbatim_from_the_input_is_not_flagged() -> None:
|
|||
"""The discriminator between this rule and "flag anything that looks like a code". The token is
|
||||
deliberately shaped like the fabrications above; the ONLY difference is that the input says it."""
|
||||
text = "Context:\nPrice schedule line ZZZ-999-01 covers technical marking.\n"
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal("ZZZ-999-01"), baseline=None, grounding=text)
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(_proposal("ZZZ-999-01"), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text))
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, ValidatedProposal), getattr(ruling, "reason", "")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -148,7 +157,8 @@ def test_e_the_stage_fires_with_no_baseline_at_all() -> None:
|
|||
proposal — because stage 0 sits behind ``if baseline is not None``."""
|
||||
text = _prompt("p6-k2-generation-prompt.txt")
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-01"), baseline=None, grounding=text), Rejection
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-01"), baseline=None, grounding=Grounding.of(text)),
|
||||
Rejection,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -165,7 +175,8 @@ def test_e_the_stage_is_not_gated_on_the_absence_of_a_baseline() -> None:
|
|||
project_id="K2", items={"M-04-01": CostBaselineLine(quantity=10.0, unit_cost=100.0)}
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-01"), baseline=baseline, grounding=text), Rejection
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-01"), baseline=baseline, grounding=Grounding.of(text)),
|
||||
Rejection,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -245,7 +256,9 @@ def test_g_the_seam_grounds_a_code_the_baseline_proves_even_when_no_prompt_repea
|
|||
baseline = CostBaseline(
|
||||
project_id="K2", items={"M-04-01": CostBaselineLine(quantity=10.0, unit_cost=100.0)}
|
||||
)
|
||||
text = _grounding_text(project, baseline, "the debate summarised this in prose, naming no code")
|
||||
text = _grounding_text(
|
||||
project, baseline, Grounding.of("the debate summarised this in prose, naming no code")
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("M-04-01"), baseline=baseline, grounding=text),
|
||||
ValidatedProposal,
|
||||
|
|
@ -259,7 +272,9 @@ def test_g_the_seam_grounds_a_code_the_delivered_base_carries() -> None:
|
|||
from portfolio_optimiser.generate import _grounding_text
|
||||
|
||||
project = _project()
|
||||
text = _grounding_text(project, None, "the price schedule line BASE-77-01 is real")
|
||||
text = _grounding_text(
|
||||
project, None, Grounding.of("the price schedule line BASE-77-01 is real")
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("BASE-77-01"), baseline=None, grounding=text),
|
||||
ValidatedProposal,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
221
tests/test_inert_identifier_loadbearing.py
Normal file
221
tests/test_inert_identifier_loadbearing.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
|||
"""P18/B1 — an identifier that stands in every document identifies none of them.
|
||||
|
||||
P7 made stage 0b ``item.code in grounding``: plain containment over ONE concatenated string. P16
|
||||
then ran it against a delivered corpus and measured what containment cannot tell apart. The
|
||||
falsification arm ``a4-indeksregulering`` proposed a 250 000 NOK saving on a single cost line whose
|
||||
code was ``R761`` — the knowledge base's OWN NAME, which every one of its 2 756 concept documents
|
||||
carries — and the whole gate said ``validated``: stage 0 was skipped (un-anchored run), stage 0b
|
||||
was satisfied by the letterhead, and the checker approved.
|
||||
|
||||
The rule this file measures: a code grounds only if it is at least ``_GROUNDING_MIN_LENGTH``
|
||||
characters AND appears in fewer than ``_GROUNDING_MAX_DOCUMENT_SHARE`` of the grounding's
|
||||
DOCUMENTS — with an absolute floor, because a share over a handful of documents is not a
|
||||
measurement (one of three is 33 % and says nothing).
|
||||
|
||||
**N and A are MEASURED, not chosen** (14.09, the four mounted vegnormal bases):
|
||||
|
||||
* every ``must_cite`` reference and every mandate ``affected_code`` in the four context sets: the
|
||||
shortest real identifier is FOUR characters (``12.1``, ``52.1``), so ``N = 3`` sits one below the
|
||||
measurement and cannot refuse anything measured;
|
||||
* document frequency of every code-shaped token (``generate._IDENTIFIER_FORMS``) in each base:
|
||||
1 692 distinct tokens and NOT ONE reaches 5 % of its base's documents. Highest anywhere 6 of 446
|
||||
(1.35 %); highest that a fasit names 3 of 446 (0.67 %); ``R761`` 2 756 of 2 756 (100 %). ``A =
|
||||
0.05`` therefore sits 3.7x above the highest real token and 20x below the defect.
|
||||
|
||||
**The denominator is NAMED in the refusal**, because Step 5 feeds that reason verbatim into the
|
||||
next attempt's prompt: a proposer told only "ungrounded" answers with another token of the same
|
||||
kind, while one told "it is in 2 756 of 2 756 documents" has been told what is wrong with it.
|
||||
|
||||
The arms that need the delivered bases SKIP with the root named; the rule's own algebra, the
|
||||
floor, and the composition seam run over synthetic input and are UNCONDITIONAL.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser import okf
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.ir import AffectedItem, SavingsProposal
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import (
|
||||
Grounding,
|
||||
Rejection,
|
||||
ValidatedProposal,
|
||||
_inert_in,
|
||||
validate_proposal,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_DEFAULT_BUNDLE_ROOT = Path.home() / "repos" / "vegnormal-okf" / "build" / "ferdig"
|
||||
_A4 = Path(
|
||||
"scratchpad/p14-stress/kontrakt-sorasen-2027/"
|
||||
"kontrakt-sorasen-2027-01-a4-indeksregulering-proposal.json"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _base(name: str) -> Path:
|
||||
root = Path(os.environ.get("PORTFOLIO_VEGNORMAL_ROOT", str(_DEFAULT_BUNDLE_ROOT)))
|
||||
if not (root / name).is_dir():
|
||||
pytest.skip(f"knowledge base {name!r} is not mounted under {root}")
|
||||
return root / name
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _grounding_over(name: str) -> Grounding:
|
||||
"""The delivered base as ``run_project`` composes it: ONE document per concept file."""
|
||||
bundle = okf.navigate_bundle(str(_base(name)))
|
||||
return Grounding(
|
||||
documents=tuple(
|
||||
"\n".join([f.name, *f.frontmatter.values(), f.body]) for f in bundle.context_files
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _proposal(code: str, *, saving: float = 1000.0) -> SavingsProposal:
|
||||
return SavingsProposal(
|
||||
project_id="p",
|
||||
measure="m",
|
||||
affected_items=[AffectedItem(code=code, quantity=1.0, unit_cost=100_000.0)],
|
||||
claimed_saving_nok=saving,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _corpus(*, documents: int, everywhere: str, once: str) -> Grounding:
|
||||
"""A synthetic grounding: one token in every document, one in exactly one."""
|
||||
return Grounding(
|
||||
documents=tuple(
|
||||
f"{everywhere} paragraf {n}" + (f" {once}" if n == 0 else "") for n in range(documents)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- the measured defect --------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_a4_proposal_p16_validated_is_now_refused() -> None:
|
||||
"""(a) THE KNOWN POSITIVE, and it is a recording rather than a construction: the proposal is
|
||||
the artefact P16's paid run wrote, replayed against the base that run was given, with
|
||||
``baseline=None`` — exactly the configuration under which it said ``validated``."""
|
||||
if not _A4.is_file():
|
||||
pytest.skip("P16's a4 artefact is not present in this checkout")
|
||||
proposal = SavingsProposal.model_validate(
|
||||
json.loads(_A4.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))["proposal"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert [i.code for i in proposal.affected_items] == ["R761"], "the artefact drifted"
|
||||
|
||||
ruling = validate_proposal(proposal, baseline=None, grounding=_grounding_over("r761-2025"))
|
||||
|
||||
assert isinstance(ruling, Rejection)
|
||||
assert "'R761'" in ruling.reason
|
||||
assert "2756 of the 2756" in ruling.reason, (
|
||||
"the refusal must name the denominator: Step 5 feeds this reason verbatim into the next "
|
||||
f"attempt's prompt — got {ruling.reason!r}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_fasit_reference_still_grounds() -> None:
|
||||
"""(b) THE KNOWN NEGATIVE over the same corpora, with its denominator stated. A rule that made
|
||||
the defect inert by making real references inert too would pass (a) perfectly."""
|
||||
sets = {
|
||||
"gate-nordvik-2027": "n100-2023",
|
||||
"fv412-dekkefornyelse-2027": "n200-2024",
|
||||
"tunnel-hauglia-2027": "n500-2024",
|
||||
"kontrakt-sorasen-2027": "r761-2025",
|
||||
}
|
||||
checked = 0
|
||||
for context, base in sets.items():
|
||||
fasit = json.loads(Path(f"contexts/{context}/fasit.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
grounding = _grounding_over(base)
|
||||
for reference in sorted({c["ref"] for m in fasit["must_cite"] for c in m["concepts"]}):
|
||||
assert reference in grounding.text, f"{reference!r} is absent from {base}"
|
||||
assert _inert_in(grounding, reference) is None, (
|
||||
f"{reference!r} is a real requirement of {base} and the rule made it inert"
|
||||
)
|
||||
checked += 1
|
||||
assert checked == 26, f"population moved: {checked} references, expected 26"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- the rule's own algebra, unconditional ---------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_token_in_one_document_grounds_and_one_in_all_of_them_does_not() -> None:
|
||||
"""(c) The discriminator, over synthetic input so it can never be absent. Both halves in one
|
||||
arm on the SAME corpus: a rule that flagged everything and one that flagged nothing each fail
|
||||
exactly one of them."""
|
||||
grounding = _corpus(documents=100, everywhere="KORPUS-01", once="LINJE-77-01")
|
||||
|
||||
assert _inert_in(grounding, "LINJE-77-01") is None
|
||||
assert _inert_in(grounding, "KORPUS-01") is not None
|
||||
assert isinstance(
|
||||
validate_proposal(_proposal("LINJE-77-01"), grounding=grounding), ValidatedProposal
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(validate_proposal(_proposal("KORPUS-01"), grounding=grounding), Rejection)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_token_too_short_to_identify_anything_is_inert() -> None:
|
||||
"""(d) The length conjunct, which the SHARE does not cover: ``R761`` is four characters, so
|
||||
length is not what made the measured defect inert. This is the coincidence class the
|
||||
measurement did not happen to contain — a one- or two-character token is in any prose."""
|
||||
grounding = Grounding(documents=("the line A is here", *("filler" for _ in range(50))))
|
||||
|
||||
assert _inert_in(grounding, "A") is not None
|
||||
assert "too short" in str(_inert_in(grounding, "A"))
|
||||
assert _inert_in(grounding, "A-1") is None, "three characters is the measured floor, not four"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_share_is_not_taken_over_a_handful_of_documents() -> None:
|
||||
"""(e) The absolute floor, and the reason every pre-P18 fixture is untouched by this rule
|
||||
rather than exempted from it: one document of three is 33 % and says nothing at all. Measured,
|
||||
the highest ABSOLUTE document count any real identifier reaches in the four corpora is 6."""
|
||||
tiny = Grounding(documents=("KODE-01 her", "KODE-01 og her", "KODE-01 og her"))
|
||||
|
||||
assert _inert_in(tiny, "KODE-01") is None, "3 of 3 is 100 %, and it is not a measurement"
|
||||
assert isinstance(validate_proposal(_proposal("KODE-01"), grounding=tiny), ValidatedProposal)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_caller_that_declares_no_boundaries_is_byte_for_byte_the_old_gate() -> None:
|
||||
"""(f) ``Grounding.of`` is the honest reading of a caller with nothing to declare, and it can
|
||||
never trip the share: one document cannot reach the floor. This is what keeps every road-path
|
||||
run and every pre-P18 test unchanged BY CONSTRUCTION rather than by exemption."""
|
||||
text = "en tekst som nevner KODE-99 og ellers ingenting"
|
||||
single = Grounding.of(text)
|
||||
|
||||
assert single.text == text, "the one-document form must not reshape the text"
|
||||
assert single.document_frequency("KODE-99") == 1
|
||||
assert _inert_in(single, "KODE-99") is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- the seam: the boundaries reach the gate from the run ------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_run_hands_the_gate_one_document_per_concept_file() -> None:
|
||||
"""(g) The COMPOSITION arm. The rule is only as good as the boundaries it is given: a run that
|
||||
still composed one blob would satisfy every arm above (which builds its own ``Grounding``) and
|
||||
reproduce the measured defect exactly. Driven through ``_grounding_text``, the one composer the
|
||||
run passes to the gate, and asserted on the COUNT of documents rather than on the text."""
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.generate import _grounding_text
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.ir import CostBaseline, CostBaselineLine
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.reference_domain import CostItem, Project
|
||||
|
||||
delivered = Grounding(documents=("dokument A", "dokument B", "dokument C"))
|
||||
project = Project(
|
||||
id="p",
|
||||
name="P",
|
||||
description="d",
|
||||
currency="NOK",
|
||||
cost_items=(
|
||||
CostItem(code="PRJ-01", description="d", unit="stk", quantity=1.0, unit_cost=1.0),
|
||||
),
|
||||
docs_dir="/nonexistent",
|
||||
)
|
||||
baseline = CostBaseline(
|
||||
project_id="p", items={"BAS-01": CostBaselineLine(quantity=1.0, unit_cost=1.0)}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
composed = _grounding_text(project, baseline, delivered)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(composed.documents) == 5, "each later source is ONE document, never appended to one"
|
||||
assert composed.text == "\n".join(
|
||||
["dokument A", "dokument B", "dokument C", "PRJ-01", "BAS-01"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -286,15 +286,43 @@ def test_e_the_ref_in_the_measure_names_the_concept(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|||
assert row.named_in_measure is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_e_a_measure_that_names_nothing_is_carried_only_by_a_snippet(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
def test_e_a_measure_that_names_nothing_is_carried_only_by_a_narrowed_snippet(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""The snippet arm still carries (b') — but only under a NARROWED scope (P18/C2)."""
|
||||
row = _judge(
|
||||
tmp_path, measure="Do it cheaper", citation_snippet=f"see {_REF}", tool_calls=_opened(_GOOD)
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
measure="Do it cheaper",
|
||||
citation_files=[_GOOD],
|
||||
citation_snippet=f"see {_REF}",
|
||||
tool_calls=_opened(_GOOD),
|
||||
).approaches[0]
|
||||
assert row.citation_scope == "narrowed"
|
||||
assert row.named_in_measure is False
|
||||
assert row.named_in_snippet is True
|
||||
assert row.named is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_e_a_whole_base_snippet_does_not_name_the_concept(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""P18/C2 (PM decision, P16 § 6.2). ``bundle_citations`` stamps EVERY context file before any
|
||||
model call, so a mark found in a whole-base snippet is evidence about what the base contains,
|
||||
not about what this run said. Measured on r761: the process number ``12.1`` stands in the
|
||||
bodies themselves, so that row came back ``named`` for a run that never named it.
|
||||
|
||||
The pair with the arm above is the discriminator: the SAME snippet, the same mark, and the only
|
||||
difference is the scope."""
|
||||
row = _judge(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
measure="Do it cheaper",
|
||||
citation_files=[_GOOD, _OTHER],
|
||||
citation_snippet=f"see {_REF}",
|
||||
tool_calls=_opened(_GOOD),
|
||||
).approaches[0]
|
||||
assert row.citation_scope == "whole-base"
|
||||
assert row.named_in_snippet is False
|
||||
assert row.named is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_e_naming_neither_way_fails_b_prime(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
row = _judge(tmp_path, measure="Do it cheaper", tool_calls=_opened(_GOOD)).approaches[0]
|
||||
assert row.named is False
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue