open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 4 Activity

Squashed 'shared/' changes from f35a22a..8aa19ec

Browse source 
8aa19ec refactor(examples)!: remove two example bundles; 0.2.0 in CHANGELOG
6c4e863 test(scripts): term-list hygiene check, term list kept outside the tree

git-subtree-dir: shared
git-subtree-split: 8aa19ec774036d337f8668532d16e6fec26d65e5
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 15:25:21 +02:00
commit 86c0cd39fc
23 changed files with 177 additions and 1673 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
skills/falsification-reviewer/references/example-evidence.json
View file

@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
{
"claim": "Trinnstyring i innkjoeringssonen gir 18 % lavere energibruk enn dagens fastnivaa.",
"claim": "Dagslysstyring i kontorlandskapet gir 18 % lavere energibruk enn dagens fastnivaa.",
"judgement": "undecided",
"refuter": null,
"judgement_note": "undecided, not survived. The one concept that could have carried a refutation was unreadable, so the claim was not actually attacked -- and a claim that was not attacked has not survived. Returning survived here would convert a gap in the knowledge base into support for the claim, which is the inversion this role exists to prevent.",
"materialisation_note": "frontmatter_verbatim is AUTHORITATIVE: it is the bytes a test materialises into a throwaway concept file before reading them back. frontmatter is its line-oriented projection and is informative only -- by construction it cannot carry a block form, which is why concept 2 has no sources key there. Materialising from frontmatter would derive state: absent and silently lose the unreadable case this example exists to demonstrate.",
"concepts": [
{
"concept_id": "kilder-tunnelbelysning-realisering",
"frontmatter_verbatim": "---\ntype: kilder\ntitle: Realiseringsgap ved tunnelbelysning\nverified: { by: human:aeriksen@example.org, at: 2026-08-11T09:20:00Z }\nsources: [{ id: nve-2024, resource: rapport-nve-2024.pdf, title: NVE 2024 }, { id: sintef-2023, resource: sintef-tr-a7712.pdf, title: SINTEF TR A7712 }]\nadjudication: adjudicated\n---\n",
"concept_id": "kilder-kontorbelysning-realisering",
"frontmatter_verbatim": "---\ntype: kilder\ntitle: Realiseringsgap ved kontorbelysning\nverified: { by: human:aeriksen@example.org, at: 2026-08-11T09:20:00Z }\nsources: [{ id: nve-2024, resource: rapport-nve-2024.pdf, title: NVE 2024 }, { id: sintef-2023, resource: sintef-tr-a7712.pdf, title: SINTEF TR A7712 }]\nadjudication: adjudicated\n---\n",
"frontmatter": {
"type": "kilder",
"title": "Realiseringsgap ved tunnelbelysning",
"title": "Realiseringsgap ved kontorbelysning",
"verified": "{ by: human:aeriksen@example.org, at: 2026-08-11T09:20:00Z }",
"sources": "[{ id: nve-2024, resource: rapport-nve-2024.pdf, title: NVE 2024 }, { id: sintef-2023, resource: sintef-tr-a7712.pdf, title: SINTEF TR A7712 }]",
"adjudication": "adjudicated"
@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
"note": "State is present and the tier is not unverified, so the verdict may rest on this concept. The tier derives as human-reviewed because the verified actor carries the human: prefix; a bare actor would have derived machine-confirmed, which also clears the threshold."
},
{
"concept_id": "tiltak-trinnstyring-innkjoringssone",
"frontmatter_verbatim": "---\ntype: tiltak\ntitle: Trinnstyring i innkjoeringssonen\nsources:\n - resource: leverandoerblad-2025.pdf\n title: Leverandoerblad 2025\n - resource: driftslogg-2025.csv\n title: Driftslogg 2025\n---\n",
"concept_id": "tiltak-dagslysstyring-kontorlandskap",
"frontmatter_verbatim": "---\ntype: tiltak\ntitle: Dagslysstyring i kontorlandskapet\nsources:\n - resource: leverandoerblad-2025.pdf\n title: Leverandoerblad 2025\n - resource: driftslogg-2025.csv\n title: Driftslogg 2025\n---\n",
"frontmatter": {
"type": "tiltak",
"title": "Trinnstyring i innkjoeringssonen"
"title": "Dagslysstyring i kontorlandskapet"
},
"evidence": {
"state": "unreadable",
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
"note": "Two independent reasons to discount, reported separately rather than merged. The sources value is written as a block list, which is not the accepted form: the state is unreadable, the shape is named, and two entries were seen. Independently, no verified key means the tier derives as unverified, and no adjudication key means unknown -- not proposed. Discounted, not rejected: the concept remains readable and its prose was read."
}
],
"ledger_note": "tiltak-trinnstyring-innkjoringssone's driftslogg entry would have been the first place to look for a refutation of the 18 % figure. It is reported as (unreadable, block-sequence, 2) rather than as absent evidence, because 'written in a form I could not read' and 'not there' point at different repairs -- and because it was unreadable rather than exhausted, the judgement is undecided rather than survived.",
"ledger_note": "tiltak-dagslysstyring-kontorlandskap's driftslogg entry would have been the first place to look for a refutation of the 18 % figure. It is reported as (unreadable, block-sequence, 2) rather than as absent evidence, because 'written in a form I could not read' and 'not there' point at different repairs -- and because it was unreadable rather than exhausted, the judgement is undecided rather than survived.",
"denominator": {
"concepts_considered": 7,
"concepts_consulted": 2,