open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 4 Activity

feat(row6): a proposal whose approach declared no requirement is unsupported

Browse source 
Stress round 6 validated three falsification arms, and every validated
approach rested only on run-level declarations nobody can attribute to one
approach. declare_requirement now takes a required approach_id (a mandate
id or own-proposal; an unknown id is refused naming the valid ones), and a
ValidatedProposal whose approach has neither a mandate requirement nor a
declaration under its own id becomes validator.Unsupported - a Rejection
subclass carrying the validator's own ruling, reported as `unsupported` in
coverage, the outcome artefact, the settlement and the judge, and never
counted or summed. The rule is active whenever the debate held the
declaration tool, the micro base included; the road and pre-pass paths are
untouched. Declaration quality is not judged, so the rule can be satisfied
by declaring any document the run read.

The v1 gate's row 6 probes pass; its artefact half reads IKKE MÅLT because
stress round 6 predates approach-addressed declarations, and IKKE MÅLT is
never green - it fails the exit code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-17 16:40:54 +02:00
commit 938a1ca30e
23 changed files with 718 additions and 115 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
tests/test_across_bundles_cli_loadbearing.py
View file

@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ def test_the_requirement_gate_reads_the_second_bases_own_opened_list(tmp_path: P
opened_1.append(explore.ToolCall(name="read_file", bundle_id=bundle_1, path=doc_1))
assert not opened_2, "the two bases shared one opened sink"
refusal = tools_2["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_2, doc_1, "Krav 1")
refusal = tools_2["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_2, doc_1, "Krav 1", "a1")
assert refusal["refusal"] == "RequirementNotRead", refusal
assert not reqs_2, "base 2 recorded a requirement it never read"
@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ def test_the_requirement_gate_reads_the_second_bases_own_opened_list(tmp_path: P
for name in [f.name for f in okf.navigate_bundle(second).context_files][:3]:
tools_2["read_file"].func(bundle_2, name)
opened_2.append(explore.ToolCall(name="read_file", bundle_id=bundle_2, path=name))
accepted = tools_2["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_2, doc_2, "Krav 1")
accepted = tools_2["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_2, doc_2, "Krav 1", "a1")
assert accepted.get("declared") is True, accepted
assert [r.path for r in reqs_2] == [doc_2]
assert not reqs_1, "the two bases shared one requirements sink"