open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 4 Activity

feat(row6): a proposal whose approach declared no requirement is unsupported

Browse source 
Stress round 6 validated three falsification arms, and every validated
approach rested only on run-level declarations nobody can attribute to one
approach. declare_requirement now takes a required approach_id (a mandate
id or own-proposal; an unknown id is refused naming the valid ones), and a
ValidatedProposal whose approach has neither a mandate requirement nor a
declaration under its own id becomes validator.Unsupported - a Rejection
subclass carrying the validator's own ruling, reported as `unsupported` in
coverage, the outcome artefact, the settlement and the judge, and never
counted or summed. The rule is active whenever the debate held the
declaration tool, the micro base included; the road and pre-pass paths are
untouched. Declaration quality is not judged, so the rule can be satisfied
by declaring any document the run read.

The v1 gate's row 6 probes pass; its artefact half reads IKKE MÅLT because
stress round 6 predates approach-addressed declarations, and IKKE MÅLT is
never green - it fails the exit code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-17 16:40:54 +02:00
commit 938a1ca30e
23 changed files with 718 additions and 115 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
tests/test_mandate_run_loadbearing.py
View file

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ from pathlib import Path
import pytest
from portfolio_optimiser.mandate import OWN_PROPOSAL_ID, Approach, Mandate
from portfolio_optimiser.mandate import BindingRequirement, OWN_PROPOSAL_ID, Approach, Mandate
from portfolio_optimiser.simulation import ScriptedChatClient
from portfolio_optimiser.run import run_project
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import Rejection, ValidatedProposal
@ -48,8 +48,11 @@ def _reply(measure: str, claimed: int) -> str:
# Labels are chosen to be ABSENT from the bundle's own prose: "LED-retrofit" appears in 6 of the
# bundle's files, so a client keyed on it would match every prompt through the context and prove
# nothing about which approach was bound to which call.
_LED = Approach(id="led-retrofit", label="Behovsstyrt belysning i fellesarealer")
_HVAC = Approach(id="hvac-swap", label="Utskifting av ventilasjonsaggregat")
#: Row 6: a commissioned approach validates only on a requirement of its own. These tests are about
#: selection and per-approach artefacts, not about declarations, so the commission names one.
_REQ = BindingRequirement(path="tiltak-led-retrofit.md", ref="Krav 1")
_LED = Approach(id="led-retrofit", label="Behovsstyrt belysning i fellesarealer", requirement=_REQ)
_HVAC = Approach(id="hvac-swap", label="Utskifting av ventilasjonsaggregat", requirement=_REQ)
#: LED validates (30k <= cap); HVAC is above the cap -> the validator rejects it.
_REPLY_BY_LABEL = {
@ -160,8 +163,12 @@ async def test_outcome_is_the_best_validated_candidate_deterministically(big_fir
orderings pinned, ``produced[-1]`` fails one case and ``produced[0]`` fails the other.
"""
sink: list[str] = []
big = Approach(id="big", label="Behovsstyrt belysning i fellesarealer") # 30k, validates
small = Approach(id="small", label="Nattsenking av temperatur") # default reply, 20k
big = Approach(
id="big", label="Behovsstyrt belysning i fellesarealer", requirement=_REQ
) # 30k, validates
small = Approach(
id="small", label="Nattsenking av temperatur", requirement=_REQ
) # default reply, 20k
mandate = Mandate(
objective="Cut energy cost without rebuilding.",
approaches=(big, small) if big_first else (small, big),