open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 3 Activity

feat(row6): a proposal whose approach declared no requirement is unsupported

Browse source 
Stress round 6 validated three falsification arms, and every validated
approach rested only on run-level declarations nobody can attribute to one
approach. declare_requirement now takes a required approach_id (a mandate
id or own-proposal; an unknown id is refused naming the valid ones), and a
ValidatedProposal whose approach has neither a mandate requirement nor a
declaration under its own id becomes validator.Unsupported - a Rejection
subclass carrying the validator's own ruling, reported as `unsupported` in
coverage, the outcome artefact, the settlement and the judge, and never
counted or summed. The rule is active whenever the debate held the
declaration tool, the micro base included; the road and pre-pass paths are
untouched. Declaration quality is not judged, so the rule can be satisfied
by declaring any document the run read.

The v1 gate's row 6 probes pass; its artefact half reads IKKE MÅLT because
stress round 6 predates approach-addressed declarations, and IKKE MÅLT is
never green - it fails the exit code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-17 16:40:54 +02:00
commit 938a1ca30e
23 changed files with 718 additions and 115 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
tests/test_requirement_comparison_loadbearing.py
View file

@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ def _declare(
for name in [f.name for f in okf.navigate_bundle(str(_TUNNEL)).context_files][:3]:
opened.append(ToolCall(name="read_file", bundle_id=_BASE_ID, path=name))
opened.append(ToolCall(name="read_file", bundle_id=_BASE_ID, path=_DOC))
answer = tools["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_id=_BASE_ID, path=_DOC, ref=ref)
answer = tools["declare_requirement"].func(
approach_id="a1", bundle_id=_BASE_ID, path=_DOC, ref=ref
)
return answer, declared
@ -115,7 +117,8 @@ def test_the_comparison_never_reads_the_callers_own_ref() -> None:
def test_without_directions_the_reply_is_the_one_p20_shipped() -> None:
"""The exploration mints its own directions, so at declaration time it HAS none — and every
call site that passes no labels must be byte-identical to before. Absent keys, not empty ones:
call site that passes no labels must carry no comparison keys (row 6 added ``approach_id`` to
every reply, the address the declaration was filed under). Absent keys, not empty ones:
"there was nothing to compare against" and "we compared and found nothing" are different
facts, and only one of them is true here."""
answer, _ = _declare(())
@ -124,6 +127,7 @@ def test_without_directions_the_reply_is_the_one_p20_shipped() -> None:
"bundle_id",
"path",
"ref",
"approach_id",
"title",
"req_number",
"binds",
@ -180,7 +184,12 @@ async def test_a_commissioned_run_reaches_the_tool_with_its_own_directions() ->
{"call": "read_file", "args": {"bundle_id": _BASE_ID, "path": _DOC}},
{
"call": "declare_requirement",
"args": {"bundle_id": _BASE_ID, "path": _DOC, "ref": "Krav 1.1-1"},
"args": {
"bundle_id": _BASE_ID,
"path": _DOC,
"ref": "Krav 1.1-1",
"approach_id": "a1",
},
},
_VALID_REPLY,
_VALID_REPLY,