docs: general wording for the remaining example-base totals

Replace the combined concept total, the distinct-token total and the
per-level document count of earlier example bases with general wording
in prose, comments and docstrings. No constant, assertion or test data
changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

tests/test_block_sources_reader_loadbearing.py

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 """P13b: a BLOCK sequence of mappings is provenance po can read, not provenance po cannot.
 
 RED-FIRST, measured 2026-09-12 with the full denominator: every concept file in all four
-knowledge bases delivered at the time wrote ``sources`` as a BLOCK sequence — **4605 of 4605, and 0
+knowledge bases delivered at the time wrote ``sources`` as a BLOCK sequence — **every one of them, and 0
 in flow form**. ``read_provenance`` answered ``UnreadableProvenance(reason="block-sequence")`` for
-every one of them, so ``evidence_for`` reported ``state="unreadable"`` on 4605 of 4605 documents:
+every one of them, so ``evidence_for`` reported ``state="unreadable"`` on every document:
 the falsification layer had no address for any document in any base po was about to be
 stress-tested against. The package's two example bases write the same form (``sources`` read as
 entries in 306 of 306 and 301 of 301 concept files, re-measured below rather than quoted).
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ def test_an_item_with_no_pair_separator_is_refused(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
     **This is the ONE arm that witnesses the colon-SPACE rule** (measured by mutation M5): a reader
     splitting on the FIRST colon reads this item as ``{'https': '//a.example/d'}``, inventing a key
     out of a URL scheme instead of refusing. Every delivered ``resource`` is a URL, so that reader
-    would mint 4605 such keys rather than fail once."""
+    would mint one such key per concept rather than fail once."""
     path = _write(tmp_path, "type: concept\nsources:\n  - https://a.example/d\n")
     result = okf.read_provenance(path, "sources")
     assert isinstance(result, okf.UnreadableProvenance)

tests/test_evidence_key_parameter_loadbearing.py

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def test_the_three_non_present_states_are_unchanged_for_any_key(tmp_path: Path)
     absent = okf.evidence_for(_concept(tmp_path), key="adjudication")
     assert (absent.state, absent.tier, absent.items_seen) == ("absent", None, 0)
 
-    # P13b made the block sequence of mappings READABLE (measured: 4605 of 4605 concepts in the
+    # P13b made the block sequence of mappings READABLE (measured: every concept in the
     # four delivered bases write exactly that form). The specimen therefore moved to one that is
     # still unreadable for a reason of its own — an item the flow decoder refuses — so this arm
     # keeps asserting what it always asserted: an unreadable value is never tiered.

tests/test_falsification_verdict_loadbearing.py

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ _ENERGI_BUNDLE = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples" / "
 def _unreadable_document(tmp_path: Path, entries: int = 1) -> Path:
     """A document whose ``verified`` is a block sequence the decoder REFUSES, with a chosen count.
 
-    P13b widened the reader to the block sequence of mappings (measured: 4605 of 4605 concepts in
+    P13b widened the reader to the block sequence of mappings (measured: every concept in
     the four delivered bases write it, and po reported every one of them unreadable). The arms below
     need a specimen that is still unreadable for a reason of its own, or they would be asserting
     against a state the reader no longer produces. This one refuses on SPEC §5.2 — an entry naming
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def test_the_committed_block_form_fixture_is_now_READ(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
     """The direction P13b reversed, pinned where the old arm stood so the change cannot be silent.
 
     ``attested.md`` was the repo's specimen for "the reader cannot read this". It is the SPEC §5.1
-    block form, which all four delivered knowledge bases write on 4605 of 4605 concepts, and it now
+    block form, which all four delivered knowledge bases write on every concept, and it now
     yields its single verification entry with the actor intact."""
     evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "attested.md")
     assert evidence.state == "present"

tests/test_inert_identifier_loadbearing.py

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ measurement (one of three is 33 % and says nothing).
   shortest real identifier is FOUR characters (``12.1``, ``52.1``), so ``N = 3`` sits one below the
   measurement and cannot refuse anything measured;
 * document frequency of every code-shaped token (``generate._IDENTIFIER_FORMS``) in each base:
-  1 692 distinct tokens and NOT ONE reaches 5 % of its base's documents. Highest anywhere 1.35 %
+  well over a thousand distinct tokens and NOT ONE reaches 5 % of its base's documents. Highest anywhere 1.35 %
   (6 documents); highest that a fasit names 0.67 % (3 documents); the base's own name is in every
   document (100 %). ``A =
   0.05`` therefore sits 3.7x above the highest real token and 20x below the defect.

tests/test_okf.py

@@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ def test_parse_frontmatter_top_level_title_survives_nested_sources_title(tmp_pat
     ``title:`` names the SOURCE document, not the concept (measured on a real concept of a
     delivered requirements corpus). Top-level keys carry no indentation and must win — a nested
     line must never overwrite a top-level key of the same name, however late it appears in the
-    scan. Without this, ``directory_listing`` on that corpus's level returned 269 documents that
-    all shared the one nested title, the source standard's own name — rung 2/3 of the navigation
+    scan. Without this, ``directory_listing`` on that corpus's level returned a few hundred documents
+    that all shared the one nested title, the source standard's own name — rung 2/3 of the navigation
     ladder collapse to an opaque UUID filename and a character count (P14 finding; the ledger is
     ``docs/invarianter.md``).