test(fase3): SC7 both profiles offline + gated Azure portfolio arm
This commit is contained in:
parent
66065053b1
commit
dd4a6ef4af
2 changed files with 56 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -150,3 +150,31 @@ async def test_c_execution_state_isolation_is_load_bearing(
|
|||
meter_factory=lambda: shared,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert sh.runs[1].provenance.token_usage > sh.runs[0].provenance.token_usage
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize("profile", ["local", "azure"])
|
||||
async def test_d_both_profiles_run_offline(
|
||||
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store, profile
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""SC7: both profiles drive the portfolio contract path OFFLINE under the synthetic client
|
||||
(the path is actually executed, not just the backend instantiated). Teeth: ``resolve_model``
|
||||
is a profile-dependent seam reachable WITHOUT egress — each profile resolves its own
|
||||
configured model from the bundled model_map.json, and local != azure (deleting the azure
|
||||
entry reddens this). Honest limitation: under an injected ``client_factory``, ``profile`` is
|
||||
otherwise inert inside ``run_project`` (run.py:152,173 ``model="fake-model"``, the F9 standing
|
||||
item); the end-to-end run proves the path executes under both, and ``resolve_model`` is the
|
||||
only profile-dependent seam provable offline."""
|
||||
from portfolio_optimiser.backends import resolve_model
|
||||
|
||||
result = await run_portfolio(
|
||||
_PORTFOLIO_IDS,
|
||||
profile,
|
||||
store=fresh_store,
|
||||
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert isinstance(result, PortfolioResult)
|
||||
assert len(result.runs) == 3
|
||||
assert all(isinstance(r, RunResult) for r in result.runs)
|
||||
# Profile-dependent teeth (offline, no egress): each profile resolves its own model.
|
||||
assert resolve_model(profile, "proposer")
|
||||
assert resolve_model("local", "proposer") != resolve_model("azure", "proposer")
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue