``contexts/dekke-og-kontrakt-lindaas-2027`` is the first set whose approaches
route at more than one knowledge base: a1/a2 at n200-2024 (material requirements)
and a3/a4 at r761-2025 (the rig, and the falsification arm). That is the whole
reason it exists -- P17b measures that ONE commission can be run across several.
``bundle.txt`` grows a block per base; a set naming one base is one block, so the
four pre-P17b files parse byte-identically. The reader now has ONE home
(``stress.read_bundle_declarations``): it used to be a private copy in the P14
gate and a second, looser one inside ``stress.main``, and the multi-base form is
exactly the change that would have let them drift.
Rule U becomes the UNION of every declared base, and that is not a formality.
MEASURED 15.09: ``enhetspris`` is absent from n200-2024 and carried by 70 of
r761-2025's 2 756 concepts, so anchors admitted per base would have admitted a
question the pass as a whole CAN ground. It was dropped from the fifth set's
anchors for that reason.
``score_context_set(bundle_id=...)`` restricts the judgement to the approaches
routed at THIS base. Without it, judging the n200 outbox reports the r761
approach as ``not_evaluated``/``absent`` -- a false finding, because that
approach WAS evaluated, against the other base, under the other run_id. That
defect is pinned by its own arm. The judge's CLI refuses to guess when a set
declares several bases, with an rc-0 control on ``--bundle``.
Arm (d) gained a second half: every DECLARED base must be named by some
approach, because a base no approach names is never run.
The P19/B2 fasit denominator moved 26 -> 32 and is asserted, not dropped: six new
references, two of them bare ``prosessnr`` (12.11, 12.12), so B1's
punctuation-and-digits form is now exercised by a fasit and not only by a
known-positive.
Suite 1774/5, golden byte-unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
P18's round 2 ended with two VALIDATED proposals whose affected_item codes
were ordinary words from a road standard's prose -- impulsventilator (4 of
270 N500 documents) and bituminoest baerelag (4 of 1133 N200). Both are
grounded in P7's sense and neither is inert in P18/B1's sense; they are simply
not identifiers of a cost line, and the gate had no stage that could say so.
Known positive MEASURED, not asserted: replayed offline against the bases
those runs were given, both come back Rejection naming the denominator.
IDENTIFIER_FORMS moved from generate.py to validator.py: they now drive both
P8's report and this gate, and two copies of "what an identifier looks like"
would let the two disagree about one run's own input.
B1 -- two new forms, transcribed from measurement. R761's requirement numbers
are bare dotted numbers and all six refs in kontrakt-sorasen's fasit are of
that shape, which neither pre-P19 form matched: r761's whole offer was 3
identifiers over 6.5 MB, and is now 2332. The FIRST form was widened in the
same pass because B2 made these forms decide prose vs identifier, and this
repo's own ENERGI-TOTAL-EL matched none of them -- a gate may only be wrong in
the direction that admits too much.
Three things keep the gate from being a rule about shapes: the generality
guard (it fires only where the input offers forms), the baseline exemption
(stage 0 has already ruled that code real), and full-matching.
Honesty limit, measured and given its OWN arm: a decimal and an R761 process
number are typographically identical, so the form counts both. P8's existing
"bare numbers" arm is narrowed to bare INTEGERS accordingly.
Measured over all nine round-1+2 outboxes: 26 of 36 codes are prose.
Load-bearing measured (22 arms), four mutations all red against the whole
suite (16 / 10 / 1 / 2), green control 1734/5 and the golden byte-unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
