"""Fase 3 — sequential portfolio fan-out over N independent projects.

Covers the success criteria: SC2 (fan-out + aggregate sums), SC4 (shared store accumulates +
load-bearing cross-project retrieval), SC3 (load-bearing meter-isolation detach), SC7 (both
profiles offline + resolve_model teeth), SC1 (new project via config only + no-hardcoded-id src
guard), SC6 (extension doc exists + references the seams).

Pattern: tests/test_vertical_slice_e2e.py:28 (run_project call shape). The project-aware
synthetic client (conftest ``make_portfolio_client_factory``) selects each project's reply by
scanning the prompt for its id, so one production-shaped factory serves the whole portfolio.
"""

import pytest

from portfolio_optimiser.run import PortfolioResult, RunResult, run_portfolio

# The synthetic reply IS the proposal: generate._parse_ir builds affected_items (each with its
# own quantity/unit_cost) straight from this JSON, and the validator's P90 = 0.30 x Σ(qty·unit_cost)
# ONLY when ``assumptions`` is empty (degenerate Monte Carlo, validator.py:108-113). All three
# replies therefore OMIT ``assumptions`` and carry explicit magnitudes so each
# ``claimed_saving_nok`` <= P90. Verified against validator + ir:
#   FV42-GSV-E1     Σ=1,482,500  P90=444,750  claimed 200,000 -> validates
#   RV13-RAS-TP     Σ=  756,000  P90=226,800  claimed 130,000 -> validates  (decoy)
#   BRU-LAKS-REHAB  Σ=2,580,500  P90=774,150  claimed 210,000 -> validates
# ``measure`` is byte-identical "Reduce scope" for FV42+BRU (measure-match is exact string
# equality, verdicts.py:68) and "Material substitution" for the decoy, so the BRU<->FV42 pair
# overlaps (shared code 05.2 + measure + magnitude bucket) while the decoy does not.
REPLIES = {
    "FV42-GSV-E1": (
        '{"measure":"Reduce scope","affected_items":['
        '{"code":"05.2","quantity":4300,"unit_cost":215},'
        '{"code":"03.1","quantity":1800,"unit_cost":310}],"claimed_saving_nok":200000}'
    ),
    "RV13-RAS-TP": (
        '{"measure":"Material substitution","affected_items":['
        '{"code":"88.2","quantity":180,"unit_cost":4200}],"claimed_saving_nok":130000}'
    ),
    "BRU-LAKS-REHAB": (
        '{"measure":"Reduce scope","affected_items":['
        '{"code":"05.2","quantity":4300,"unit_cost":215},'
        '{"code":"07.4","quantity":2400,"unit_cost":690}],"claimed_saving_nok":210000}'
    ),
}

_PORTFOLIO_IDS = ["FV42-GSV-E1", "RV13-RAS-TP", "BRU-LAKS-REHAB"]


async def test_a_fanout_returns_one_runresult_per_project(
    make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
    """SC2: run_portfolio fans out sequentially, one RunResult per project, and aggregates the
    validated/rejected counts + claimed-saving + token sums."""
    result = await run_portfolio(
        _PORTFOLIO_IDS,
        "local",
        store=fresh_store,
        client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
    )
    assert isinstance(result, PortfolioResult)
    assert len(result.runs) == 3
    assert all(isinstance(r, RunResult) for r in result.runs)
    # Aggregate pinned to the fixture constants above (all three validate).
    assert result.validated_count == 3
    assert result.rejected_count == 0
    assert result.sum_claimed_saving_nok == 540000
    # Explicit element-wise wiring check (not the field's own sum() definition).
    expected_tokens = (
        result.runs[0].provenance.token_usage
        + result.runs[1].provenance.token_usage
        + result.runs[2].provenance.token_usage
    )
    assert result.sum_token_usage == expected_tokens
    assert all(r.provenance.token_usage > 0 for r in result.runs)


async def test_a2_unknown_project_id_raises(make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store) -> None:
    """The unknown-id error path: an id absent from the loaded portfolio raises ValueError."""
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        await run_portfolio(
            ["NOPE-DOES-NOT-EXIST"],
            "local",
            store=fresh_store,
            client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
        )