P13 measured this lift and REFUSED it, because okf >=0.8.5 emits the ownership
stamp as the V1 flow mapping `generated: { by: process:okf-ingest, at: ... }`
where 0.3.2 emitted `true`, and `_carries_complete_ingest_stamp` read the new
form as NOT a stamp -- write_concept_file's forgery refusal would have shipped
DISARMED with the whole fail-closed suite green. That blocker is closed first,
red-first, and then the pin moves.
ROW 1, THE SECURITY HALF. `_claims_ingest_ownership` widens the predicate from
"reads as boolean True" to "claims ingest ownership", of which the boolean is
the pre-V1 spelling. The recogniser for the new half is `decode_flow_value` --
the module's ONE flow decoder, the same argument write_concept_file already
makes for `verified`: the writer refuses exactly what the reader can read. A
value the decoder REFUSES is therefore not an ownership claim and writes
through, which is what keeps this from collapsing into "any non-empty
generated". Two arms red before the fix; no YAML library introduced.
THE PIN. okf v0.3.2 -> v0.8.5, guard v0.3.4 -> v1.4.0 spelled `tag =`, not
`rev =`, and not the declared floor 1.2.0 -- both P13 premises hold and the
reason now lives next to the pin in pyproject.toml. The ":40" comment is
corrected: okf has ONE runtime dependency, the guard, and that is what binds
the two lines together. 27/27 imported names resolve across five modules.
THE GOLDENS, REGENERATED AS A DECISION. Seven concept files across four
examples/ingest-golden-* bundles, one line each. Two were regenerated by the
REAL materializer; the other five are derived (http/sql/mcp cannot materialize
outside the tests' stubs) and then MEASURED -- all four golden suites compare
byte for byte against what the stubs produce, and all four are green. The four
`generated == "true"` asserts now read ONE source, conftest.
expected_generated_stamp: four literals for one emitter fact are four places a
later release can leave half-corrected, which is exactly how the pre-V1 form
survived until P13 measured it. tests/test_okf.py keeps its literal on purpose
-- that one round-trips a CURATED half-stamp through our own writer.
THE BLOCK READER. Measured with the full denominator: all four delivered
knowledge bases write `sources` as a BLOCK sequence and none in flow form
(n100 446/446, n200 1133/1133, n500 270/270, r761 2756/2756 = 4605/4605), and
`evidence_for` reported `unreadable` on 4605 of 4605 -- the falsification layer
had no address for any document in any base. `okf.decode_block_mappings` is the
second CARRIER of one grammar, never a second grammar: colon-SPACE separator,
unquote_scalar, duplicate keys refused, SPEC 5.2's actor rule applied. okf's
consume.read_sources was READ for the form and not called; po calls no okf
reader, which is measured and deliberate. After: 4605 present / 4605 entries.
Reading is not a licence to WRITE -- the emitter is untouched and both writers
still refuse what decode_flow_value refuses.
THREE FINDINGS. (1) The first block reader INVENTED data on `- { k: v }` items
-- SPEC-canonical, and the shape tests/golden/block-form-provenance writes for
`verified` -- decoding it as `{'{ id': '...'}`. No arm caught it: the 5.2 actor
rule shielded the fixture by accident. Closed with a flow-decoder branch and
four new arms. (2) One of my own arms was VACUOUS, found by my own mutation M5:
it claimed to prove the colon-SPACE rule and stayed green under first-colon,
because the two rules agree on every delivered value. Renamed, labelled, and
the claim moved to the arm that actually witnesses it. (3) OPEN, and it needs
the operator: the commons-owned worked example declares its second concept
`unreadable`/`block-sequence`, which is now false for po. `shared/` is
pull-only, so closing it needs a commons amendment; the test asserts the
divergence instead of skipping it, keeping the discriminating half (the example
says two entries were seen and the reader returns exactly two).
NINE EXISTING ARMS REWRITTEN, NONE WEAKENED. All nine pinned "the block form is
unreadable" -- the behaviour this order changes. Each keeps its claim on a
specimen that is still unreadable for a reason of its own (5.2: an entry naming
no actor), or pins the REVERSED direction where the old arm stood so the change
cannot be silent. Two got STRONGER: multi-verified.md was authored for "a reader
keeping the last entry reports machine-confirmed for a concept a human signed",
and that could not be tested while the form was unreadable. Three node ids were
renamed; nothing was removed in substance.
Suite 1582 -> 1606 passed / 5 skipped. Both demo goldens byte-unchanged
(ea8c534... / ede3e2f..., shasum -a 1 of the CONTENT, never the git blob id).
ruff check / ruff format / mypy green. shared/ untouched.
Six mutations, all red against the WHOLE suite, each with its own signature:
row 1 detached (2) / block reader detached (17) / flow-item branch detached (7)
/ a stray indented line folds into an INVENTED entry (4) / separator becomes the
first colon (1 -- and that is finding 2) / the stamp expectation reverts to
"true" (4).
Order: 20260912T195112Z-995611104-from-.claude
Record: docs/2026-09-12-p13b-okf-bump.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
348 lines
17 KiB
Python
348 lines
17 KiB
Python
"""The falsification-verdict seam — load-bearing gates for reading OKF provenance.
|
|
|
|
This module opens with the ONE thing that has to be captured before any decoder exists: the
|
|
bytes today's ``bundle_context`` renders from a **block-form** provenance bundle. Later steps
|
|
add a decoder that reads ``verified``/``sources`` in that form; this gate is what proves the
|
|
decoder did not move the read-context on its way in.
|
|
|
|
The comparison is **byte-for-byte**, with no trailing-whitespace normalisation. The commons
|
|
nav-goldens normalise because commons owns their line endings and this repo consumes them
|
|
through a pull-only subtree; ``tests/golden/block-form-provenance/`` is repo-owned, so the
|
|
stricter comparison is available and is what the criterion asks for.
|
|
|
|
The resolver below is LOCAL on purpose. ``tests/test_okf.py::_nav_golden`` hard-codes
|
|
``shared/examples/`` (``test_okf.py:51``) and lives in a module this work must not touch, so
|
|
reusing it would mean editing a frozen module to reach a repo-owned fixture.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import shutil
|
|
import tempfile
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser import okf, tools, verdicts
|
|
|
|
_GOLDEN_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "tests" / "golden" / "block-form-provenance"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _block_form_golden() -> tuple[str, str]:
|
|
"""The repo-owned block-form case: ``(bundle_dir, expected_read_context)``."""
|
|
return (
|
|
str(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle"),
|
|
(_GOLDEN_DIR / "expected-read-context.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8"),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_block_form_bundle_renders_the_captured_bytes() -> None:
|
|
"""Navigation is TOLERANT of block-form provenance, and these are the bytes it produces.
|
|
|
|
THREE claims on ONE fixture in ONE test, and the coexistence is the property (S7). First,
|
|
``navigate_bundle`` reaches every file and skips nothing — a block ``verified:`` sequence is
|
|
ordinary frontmatter to a line-oriented parser, so it must not break navigation, and ``skipped``
|
|
being empty is the positive statement that no link was silently passed over. Second, the
|
|
decoder REFUSES the same document's ``sources``. Third, the rendered read-context is
|
|
byte-identical to the committed fasit. The fasit was generated by the code that predates any
|
|
decoder work: if it were regenerated afterwards, the comparison would prove an implementation
|
|
identical to itself and nothing else.
|
|
|
|
Splitting the refusal and the byte identity into two tests would lose exactly what is being
|
|
asserted — that a decoder strict enough to refuse this document did not make navigation any
|
|
less tolerant of it.
|
|
"""
|
|
bundle_dir, expected = _block_form_golden()
|
|
bundle = okf.navigate_bundle(bundle_dir)
|
|
|
|
assert bundle.skipped == (), (
|
|
f"navigation skipped a link it should have followed: {bundle.skipped}"
|
|
)
|
|
assert [f.name for f in bundle.files] == ["index.md", "attested.md", "multi-verified.md"]
|
|
|
|
# (2) The decoder READS the same document's block `sources`, on the very same fixture — the
|
|
# direction REVERSED by P13b, and the fixture's own body is what asked for it ("a reader that
|
|
# only understands the flow shorthand loses the provenance of this concept entirely"). The
|
|
# coexistence claim is unchanged and is now the stronger one: a decoder that reads this
|
|
# document did not make navigation any less tolerant of it, and did not move a byte of (3).
|
|
sources = okf.read_provenance(Path(bundle_dir) / "attested.md", "sources")
|
|
assert sources == (
|
|
{
|
|
"resource": "https://example.invalid/fixture-cost-baseline",
|
|
"id": "fixture-cost-baseline",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# (3) And the bytes have not moved. This clause is the one a no-op cannot fake: tolerant
|
|
# navigation was ALREADY today's behaviour, so clauses (1) and (2) alone are green on a tree
|
|
# with none of this work in it. The commons nav-goldens carry no block-form provenance
|
|
# anywhere, so every existing byte fasit could stay green while the decoder broke navigation
|
|
# for real corpus documents — this repo-owned fixture is the one that could not.
|
|
assert okf.bundle_context(bundle) == expected
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- Step 7: the falsification verdict, with the third state carrying its reason ---------------
|
|
|
|
_ENERGI_BUNDLE = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples" / "bygg-energi-mikro"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _unreadable_document(tmp_path: Path, entries: int = 1) -> Path:
|
|
"""A document whose ``verified`` is a block sequence the decoder REFUSES, with a chosen count.
|
|
|
|
P13b widened the reader to the block sequence of mappings (measured: 4605 of 4605 concepts in
|
|
the four delivered bases write it, and po reported every one of them unreadable). The arms below
|
|
need a specimen that is still unreadable for a reason of its own, or they would be asserting
|
|
against a state the reader no longer produces. This one refuses on SPEC §5.2 — an entry naming
|
|
no ``by`` actor — which keeps the reason token ``block-sequence`` and lets the count be chosen,
|
|
so the triple those arms assert on is unchanged rather than relabelled.
|
|
"""
|
|
path = tmp_path / f"unreadable-{entries}.md"
|
|
items = "".join(f" - at: 2026-01-0{n + 1}T00:00:00Z\n" for n in range(entries))
|
|
path.write_text(f"---\ntype: concept\nverified:\n{items}---\n\nInnhold.\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
|
return path
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _present_document(tmp_path: Path) -> Path:
|
|
"""A REAL flow-form document, produced by our own writer — never a mock.
|
|
|
|
All three arms below read committed or freshly-written files, because the property under test
|
|
is what the reader does with bytes on disk, and a stubbed reader would test the stub.
|
|
"""
|
|
dst = tmp_path / "bundle"
|
|
shutil.copytree(_ENERGI_BUNDLE, dst)
|
|
return verdicts.promote_verdict(
|
|
str(dst),
|
|
verdicts.Verdict(
|
|
id="EVIDENCE-PRESENT",
|
|
proposal_features=verdicts.bundle_candidate_features(str(dst)),
|
|
decision="approved",
|
|
rationale="godkjent",
|
|
),
|
|
approver="process:fixture-check",
|
|
experiment="exp-B",
|
|
timestamp="2026-06-30T09:00:00Z",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_flow_form_document_is_present_and_tiered(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""CONTROL — without it, every arm below is satisfied by a reader that always says "absent"."""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path))
|
|
assert evidence.state == "present"
|
|
assert evidence.tier == "machine-confirmed"
|
|
assert evidence.reason is None, (
|
|
"a present state has no reason to carry, and must not invent one"
|
|
)
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_document_without_the_key_is_absent_and_carries_no_tier() -> None:
|
|
"""``absent`` is what a document that never claimed verification says — and it is NOT the same
|
|
fact as ``unreadable``."""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "index.md")
|
|
assert evidence.state == "absent"
|
|
assert evidence.tier is None
|
|
assert evidence.reason is None
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_an_undecodable_document_is_unreadable_and_says_WHY(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The third state, and the arm asserts the REASON, not merely the state.
|
|
|
|
A collapsed ``unreadable`` → ``absent`` is a verdict on missing evidence presented as evidence
|
|
of absence. Asserting only ``state != "present"`` would stay green against exactly that
|
|
collapse, so the reason token is what this arm pins.
|
|
|
|
The specimen moved off the committed fixture when P13b made the block sequence READABLE. What
|
|
the arm claims is unchanged — the third state still exists and still carries its reason — and
|
|
the specimen now refuses on a rule of its own (SPEC §5.2, an entry naming no actor) rather than
|
|
on the carrier having no reader.
|
|
"""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_unreadable_document(tmp_path))
|
|
assert evidence.state == "unreadable"
|
|
assert evidence.reason == "block-sequence"
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_committed_block_form_fixture_is_now_READ(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The direction P13b reversed, pinned where the old arm stood so the change cannot be silent.
|
|
|
|
``attested.md`` was the repo's specimen for "the reader cannot read this". It is the SPEC §5.1
|
|
block form, which all four delivered knowledge bases write on 4605 of 4605 concepts, and it now
|
|
yields its single verification entry with the actor intact."""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "attested.md")
|
|
assert evidence.state == "present"
|
|
assert evidence.reason is None
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 1
|
|
assert evidence.entries[0]["by"] == "process:fixture-check"
|
|
assert evidence.tier == "machine-confirmed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_two_entry_block_document_keeps_the_human_sign_off() -> None:
|
|
"""The defect this fixture was AUTHORED for, finally checkable rather than merely avoided.
|
|
|
|
``multi-verified.md`` carries a human sign-off FIRST and a process entry SECOND. Until P13b the
|
|
block form came back unreadable, so "no tier at all" was the honest answer — and the
|
|
second-entry-wins defect the fixture's body describes could not be tested for, only sidestepped.
|
|
Now that the form is read, the claim is the real one: both entries survive IN ORDER and the tier
|
|
is the human one. A reader keeping the last entry it saw would report ``machine-confirmed`` for
|
|
a concept a human signed, with nothing failing.
|
|
"""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "multi-verified.md")
|
|
assert evidence.state == "present"
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 2
|
|
assert [entry["by"] for entry in evidence.entries] == [
|
|
"human:fixture-reviewer",
|
|
"process:fixture-nightly",
|
|
]
|
|
assert evidence.tier == "human-reviewed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_an_unreadable_document_yields_NO_tier(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The half of the arm above that P13b did NOT change: the honest answer to a value that could
|
|
not be read is no tier at all, never a tier derived from what the reader limped past."""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_unreadable_document(tmp_path, entries=2))
|
|
assert evidence.state == "unreadable"
|
|
assert evidence.tier is None
|
|
assert evidence.items_seen == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_evidence_notice_is_None_when_there_is_nothing_to_say(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""Omission, never an empty row — the ``cost_baseline_notice`` precedent."""
|
|
assert okf.evidence_notice(okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path))) is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_evidence_notice_prints_the_reason_TOKEN_itself(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""No second display vocabulary. A prose translation here would be free to drift from
|
|
``ProvenanceReason``, and the drifted copy is the one the operator would read.
|
|
|
|
The specimen moved from the committed fixture to ``_unreadable_document`` because P13b made the
|
|
fixture READABLE; the token and the count asserted are unchanged."""
|
|
notice = okf.evidence_notice(okf.evidence_for(_unreadable_document(tmp_path)))
|
|
assert notice is not None
|
|
assert "block-sequence" in notice
|
|
assert "items_seen=1" in notice
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- Amendment A: the K5 threshold ------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_admits_falsification_refuses_a_state_that_is_not_present(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""AMENDMENT A, first conjunct — a verdict may not rest on evidence that was never read.
|
|
|
|
Both non-present states are exercised: unreadable (the specimen, since P13b made the committed
|
|
fixture readable) and absent (``index.md``, which declares no ``verified`` at all)."""
|
|
assert not okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_unreadable_document(tmp_path)))
|
|
assert not okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "index.md"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_admits_falsification_refuses_an_unverified_tier() -> None:
|
|
"""AMENDMENT A, second conjunct — its OWN arm, because one arm cannot separate two conjuncts.
|
|
|
|
**This state is not reachable through ``evidence_for`` today, and that is measured, not
|
|
assumed:** ``decode_flow_value`` refuses an empty flow sequence, so a ``present`` value always
|
|
carries at least one entry naming an actor, and ``trust_tier`` therefore never answers
|
|
``unverified`` for it. The conjunct is DEFENSIVE, which is precisely why it needs an arm of its
|
|
own — a single arm over a reachable document would leave it untested, and an untested conjunct
|
|
is one a later simplification deletes without anything going red.
|
|
"""
|
|
unverified = okf.FalsificationEvidence(
|
|
file="crafted.md", state="present", tier="unverified", reason=None, entries=(), items_seen=0
|
|
)
|
|
assert not okf.admits_falsification(unverified)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_admits_falsification_ADMITS_the_positive_case(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""CONTROL — an always-refusing threshold passes both negative arms and is worthless."""
|
|
assert okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_discounted_concept_reports_the_TRIPLE_not_merely_the_refusal(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""AMENDMENT A — "why it was discounted" is the operative fact.
|
|
|
|
A dropped concept and a discounted one are different facts, and only the second is honest about
|
|
what was read. Asserting that admission was denied says nothing about which of them happened;
|
|
the triple ``(state, reason, items_seen)`` is what makes the difference legible.
|
|
"""
|
|
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_unreadable_document(tmp_path, entries=2))
|
|
assert not okf.admits_falsification(evidence)
|
|
assert (evidence.state, evidence.reason, evidence.items_seen) == (
|
|
"unreadable",
|
|
"block-sequence",
|
|
2,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- Step 8: the adjudication state, named and never collapsed to absent ------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _concept(text: str) -> Path:
|
|
path = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="okf-adjudication-")) / "c.md"
|
|
path.write_text(text, encoding="utf-8")
|
|
return path
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("value", ["proposed", "adjudicated"])
|
|
def test_the_two_named_states_are_read_back(value: str) -> None:
|
|
"""Hand-written fixtures, to the contract as delivered.
|
|
|
|
**Honesty limit, stated:** these are written to the contract, NOT produced by
|
|
``llm-ingestion-okf``. Integration against the producer's own golden is later work and is not
|
|
claimed here.
|
|
"""
|
|
assert okf.adjudication_for(
|
|
_concept(f"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: {value}\n---\nb\n")
|
|
) == (value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_missing_key_is_unknown_and_NEVER_absent() -> None:
|
|
"""The third token is the whole step.
|
|
|
|
A concept that does not carry the key means *we did not learn whether this was adjudicated* —
|
|
an older bundle. Collapsing that into "it was not adjudicated" is the same defect as collapsing
|
|
``unreadable`` into ``absent`` one layer up, and the same defect removed from
|
|
``RunResult.verdict``.
|
|
"""
|
|
assert okf.adjudication_for(_concept("---\ntype: concept\ntitle: x\n---\nb\n")) == "unknown"
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("value", ["ratified", "PROPOSED", ""])
|
|
def test_a_value_outside_the_vocabulary_is_refused_by_name(value: str) -> None:
|
|
"""Validation, never repair. Mapping an unknown value to ``unknown`` would invent the very
|
|
state this contract exists to keep honest — and an EMPTY value is present-but-empty, which is a
|
|
different fact from absent and must not be folded into it either."""
|
|
with pytest.raises(okf.AdjudicationValueError) as excinfo:
|
|
okf.adjudication_for(_concept(f"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: {value}\n---\nb\n"))
|
|
assert "adjudication" in str(excinfo.value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_carrier_hands_the_STATE_to_a_hypothesiser(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""THE LOAD-BEARING ARM — the gate is the CARRIER, not the enum.
|
|
|
|
An accessor that returns three tokens which nothing propagates is a vocabulary, not a seam. So
|
|
the assertion is on what the tool actually hands back: a payload carrying the state. A carrier
|
|
that returned the concept without its state would leave ``adjudication_for`` correct and the
|
|
hypothesiser none the wiser, which is the exact shape this step exists to close.
|
|
"""
|
|
bundle = tmp_path / "bundle"
|
|
bundle.mkdir()
|
|
(bundle / "a.md").write_text(
|
|
"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: proposed\n---\nbody\n", encoding="utf-8"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
carrier = tools.make_adjudication_tool(str(bundle))
|
|
payload = tools.adjudication_payload(str(bundle), "a.md")
|
|
|
|
assert payload["adjudication"] == "proposed"
|
|
assert payload["concept"] == "a.md"
|
|
assert carrier.name == "concept_adjudication_state"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_carrier_is_a_library_primitive_not_wired_into_the_run(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""``run.py`` must not import the carrier: wiring it into the run surface would move the
|
|
byte-pinned demo transcript, and would make the state reachable only by reading a run's output
|
|
rather than by calling a function."""
|
|
run_source = (
|
|
Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "src" / "portfolio_optimiser" / "run.py"
|
|
).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
assert "make_adjudication_tool" not in run_source
|
|
assert "adjudication_payload" not in run_source
|