portfolio-optimiser/tests/conftest.py
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 126807aee7 feat(validator): anchor the deterministic gate to the project's real cost baseline (S4.0)
Every stage of validate_proposal reasoned only about numbers the proposal itself
supplied, so an internally-consistent hallucination cleared the whole gate (F3).
A new stage 0 reconciles each affected_item against the project's CostBaseline
before the CBC solve: an unknown cost code is rejected, and a real code carrying
a quantity/unit_cost outside the configured tolerance (5% default, relative to
the baseline value) is rejected. Validation, never repair.

The baseline argument is OPTIONAL (None = pre-S4.0 behaviour), but both run
paths set it: the road path projects project.cost_items, the bundle path loads
cost-baseline.json when the bundle ships one. Bundles written before the
amendment stay un-anchored, so the commons-owned goldens run byte-identically;
a baseline that exists but is malformed still raises on both loaders.

F8: the method-specific cap now comes from the METHOD_CAPS registry (measure
type -> fraction, injectable) instead of an energy_efficiency string comparison.

The baseline format and tolerance semantics were decided locally — the commons
amendment (D-A pt. 2) never arrived, exactly as in S3.2. D7 mirroring stays open.

Three portfolio fixtures quoted cost codes belonging to OTHER projects; the new
gate caught them. They now quote each project's own lines, and the two copied
REPLIES tables import the single source instead of drifting from it.

Load-bearing measured (tests/test_s40_cost_baseline_loadbearing.py), six
mutations all red: detach the reconciliation stage; detach the magnitude
tolerance; detach the road wiring; detach the bundle wiring; ignore the injected
cap registry; make the optional loader tolerant of malformed content. Control:
with the road wiring detached the repaired portfolio fixtures still pass, so
they are not masking the seam. 597 -> 612 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JdwK7bQ4BZkWH4t8MRDKb4
2026-08-03 17:19:31 +02:00

194 lines
7.6 KiB
Python

"""Shared e2e fixtures (Step 13): a scripted chat client that emits a SYNTHETIC UsageDetails
(so token accounting is real-shaped without an LLM), plus store + docs-dir fixtures.
The synthetic ``UsageDetails`` is what lets the budget meter / provenance ``token_usage`` be a
positive, UsageDetails-sourced number in CI — the REAL-provider populated-usage assertion is
the gated live arm (Step 14).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from collections.abc import Callable, Sequence
import pytest
from agent_framework import BaseChatClient
from portfolio_optimiser.reference_domain import load_reference_projects
from portfolio_optimiser.simulation import ScriptedChatClient
from portfolio_optimiser.verdicts import VerdictStore, seed_store
class SyntheticUsageChatClient(ScriptedChatClient):
"""The scripted-list-then-default test double — now a THIN subclass of the canonical
``ScriptedChatClient`` (S2.5 consolidation). It keeps its full PUBLIC surface (the
``default_reply=`` kwarg constructor, the ``call_count`` attribute, ``model``/OTEL
``"synthetic"``) but delegates the shared ``_inner_get_response`` body to the canonical — the
scripted-list-then-default behaviour lives in its selector."""
def __init__(
self,
scripted: Sequence[str] | None = None,
*,
default_reply: str = "ok",
tokens_per_reply: int = 8,
) -> None:
scripted_list = list(scripted or [])
counter = {"i": 0}
def _select(_blob: str, _role: str) -> str:
i = counter["i"]
counter["i"] = i + 1
return scripted_list[i] if i < len(scripted_list) else default_reply
super().__init__(
reply_selector=_select, default_reply=default_reply, tokens_per_reply=tokens_per_reply
)
@pytest.fixture()
def make_client_factory() -> Callable[..., Callable[[str], BaseChatClient]]:
"""Return a maker that builds a per-role client factory emitting synthetic usage."""
def _make(default_reply: str, *, tokens: int = 8) -> Callable[[str], BaseChatClient]:
def factory(role: str) -> BaseChatClient:
return SyntheticUsageChatClient(default_reply=default_reply, tokens_per_reply=tokens)
return factory
return _make
_DEFAULT_CLAIM = 20_000
# Last-resort reply for a prompt naming NO known reference project (the anchored per-project
# fallback below cannot be built then). Kept for that case only.
_PORTFOLIO_DEFAULT_REPLY = (
'{"measure":"Reduce scope","affected_items":'
'[{"code":"01.1","quantity":1,"unit_cost":100000}],"claimed_saving_nok":20000}'
)
def _anchored_default_replies() -> dict[str, str]:
"""A VALID default proposal PER reference project, quoting that project's OWN first cost line
verbatim (S4.0): since the road path anchors the validator to ``project.cost_items``, a generic
reply carrying an invented magnitude for code ``01.1`` is now — correctly — rejected as a
fabricated cost line. Anchoring the fixture is the fix; weakening the gate is not.
``claimed_saving_nok`` stays ``20_000`` for every project, exactly as the single generic reply
claimed before, so every ledger/goal/budget assertion built on that figure is unchanged. Each
project's first line is ``01.1 Rigg og drift`` at >= 480 000 NOK, so P90 (>= 144 000) clears the
claim on every project."""
replies: dict[str, str] = {}
for project in load_reference_projects():
line = project.cost_items[0]
replies[project.id] = json.dumps(
{
"measure": "Reduce scope",
"affected_items": [
{"code": line.code, "quantity": line.quantity, "unit_cost": line.unit_cost}
],
"claimed_saving_nok": _DEFAULT_CLAIM,
}
)
return replies
class _ProjectAwareUsageChatClient(ScriptedChatClient):
"""Selects its reply by scanning the incoming prompt for a known ``project_id`` substring (the
prompt embeds ``project.id`` at run.py:162 and generate.py:48), falling back to a default valid
proposal — so ``run_portfolio``'s single ``client_factory`` stays production-shaped while tests
vary the proposal per project. A THIN subclass: the prompt-scan lives in its selector, the shared
``_inner_get_response`` body in the canonical.
The fallback is itself project-aware (S4.0): a prompt naming a reference project gets that
project's baseline-anchored default reply, so an un-mapped project still produces a proposal the
anchored validator admits. Only a prompt naming NO known project falls through to
``default_reply``."""
def __init__(
self, replies: dict[str, str], *, default_reply: str, tokens_per_reply: int = 8
) -> None:
table = dict(replies)
anchored = _anchored_default_replies()
def _select(blob: str, _role: str) -> str:
explicit = next((r for pid, r in table.items() if pid in blob), None)
if explicit is not None:
return explicit
return next((r for pid, r in anchored.items() if pid in blob), default_reply)
super().__init__(
reply_selector=_select, default_reply=default_reply, tokens_per_reply=tokens_per_reply
)
@pytest.fixture()
def make_portfolio_client_factory() -> Callable[..., Callable[[str], BaseChatClient]]:
"""Return a maker that builds a single project-aware client factory: every client it
produces picks its reply from ``replies`` by scanning the prompt for the project id, so one
factory serves the whole portfolio (matching ``run_portfolio``'s single-factory seam)."""
def _make(
replies: dict[str, str],
*,
default_reply: str = _PORTFOLIO_DEFAULT_REPLY,
tokens: int = 8,
) -> Callable[[str], BaseChatClient]:
def factory(role: str) -> BaseChatClient:
return _ProjectAwareUsageChatClient(
replies, default_reply=default_reply, tokens_per_reply=tokens
)
return factory
return _make
class _RecordingChatClient(ScriptedChatClient):
"""Records the incoming prompt blob per call into a SHARED sink, then returns a fixed valid
reply. Lets a test assert exactly what text reached the prompt — the probe the Step-1 ExpeL
wiring is made load-bearing against (does a prior verdict reach the hypothesis prompt?). A THIN
subclass: the canonical records to the ``sink`` (when given one) and returns the constant reply."""
def __init__(self, sink: list[str], reply: str, *, tokens_per_reply: int = 8) -> None:
super().__init__(reply, sink, tokens_per_reply=tokens_per_reply)
@pytest.fixture()
def make_recording_client_factory() -> Callable[
[str], tuple[Callable[[str], BaseChatClient], list[str]]
]:
"""Return a maker that builds a per-role client factory recording every prompt blob into a
shared list. Returns ``(factory, recorded_prompts)`` so the test inspects what reached the
prompt across the whole run (debate rounds + generation)."""
def _make(reply: str) -> tuple[Callable[[str], BaseChatClient], list[str]]:
sink: list[str] = []
def factory(role: str) -> BaseChatClient:
return _RecordingChatClient(sink, reply)
return factory, sink
return _make
@pytest.fixture()
def fresh_store() -> VerdictStore:
return VerdictStore(verdicts=[])
@pytest.fixture()
def seeded_store() -> VerdictStore:
return seed_store()
@pytest.fixture()
def docs_dir(tmp_path) -> str:
d = tmp_path / "docs"
d.mkdir()
(d / "cost.txt").write_text(
"Asphalt Ab11 unit rate renegotiation reduced the paving cost on the school stretch.",
encoding="utf-8",
)
return str(d)