open/portfolio-optimiser
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity Actions
Generic, open framework on Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF): multi-agent cost-saving proposals gated by a mandatory deterministic validator, with HITL learning.
19 commits 1 branch 0 tags 830 KiB
  • Python 100%
Find a file
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 78e03c3254 docs(fase2): /trekbrief — gated MVP vertical-slice brief (6/6) [skip-docs] 
Fase 2 started. Brief for the MVP vertical slice (one synthetic project
end-to-end on MAF 1.9.0: debate -> blocking validator -> two-layer HITL +
provenance -> ExpeL learning) produced via /trekbrief from documented intent
(incremental-plan §Fase 2 + capability-map §1/§5 + Fase 1 findings), not live
Q&A per the project operating model. framing=preserve; phase_signals=high/opus.

Brief-reviewer gate passed 6/6 (all dimensions 5; verdict PROCEED_WITH_RISKS)
after 2 iterations: iter 1 flagged a no-op token-accounting criterion and a
false-positive on research-field order; 3 derivable refinements applied
(retargeted the UsageDetails assertion, added Open Questions for the concrete
local model + Foundry deployment names, added a topic-count note). Validator
green (0 errors/warnings).

3 research topics identified (gaps the capability-map did not resolve): native
HITL in MAF workflows, local_folder via MCPStdioTool + citation provenance, and
a real local-profile chat client (spikes used only FakeChatClient). Manual path:
stopped at the brief as a gated checkpoint; research must run before /trekplan.

.gitignore: ignore generated .html annotation + progress.json render-derivatives
under .claude/projects/ (the .md sources stay tracked).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fif1r1En5W542HbZV88yMH
2026-06-24 11:56:57 +02:00
.claude/projects docs(fase2): /trekbrief — gated MVP vertical-slice brief (6/6) [skip-docs] 2026-06-24 11:56:57 +02:00
docs docs(research): MAF 1.9.0 capability map — feature-utilization for Fase 2 [skip-docs] 2026-06-24 11:36:26 +02:00
spikes fix(fase1): spike B fan-out measures real conversation bleed, not a counter 2026-06-24 11:09:55 +02:00
src/portfolio_optimiser feat(fase0): synthetic reference domain (D4) + backend profile skeleton (D2) 2026-06-23 22:38:41 +02:00
tests fix(fase1): spike B fan-out measures real conversation bleed, not a counter 2026-06-24 11:09:55 +02:00
.gitignore docs(fase2): /trekbrief — gated MVP vertical-slice brief (6/6) [skip-docs] 2026-06-24 11:56:57 +02:00
.python-version feat: initial scaffold (Python framework on Microsoft Agent Framework) 2026-06-23 22:01:22 +02:00
CHANGELOG.md feat: initial scaffold (Python framework on Microsoft Agent Framework) 2026-06-23 22:01:22 +02:00
CLAUDE.md build(fase1): add dev orchestration + solver + async deps, scaffold spikes 2026-06-24 09:57:57 +02:00
pyproject.toml build(fase1): add dev orchestration + solver + async deps, scaffold spikes 2026-06-24 09:57:57 +02:00
README.md feat: initial scaffold (Python framework on Microsoft Agent Framework) 2026-06-23 22:01:22 +02:00
uv.lock build(fase1): add dev orchestration + solver + async deps, scaffold spikes 2026-06-24 09:57:57 +02:00

README.md

portfolio-optimiser

Generic, open framework on Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) for finding cost-savings / efficiency proposals within each project of a portfolio of independent projects. Multiple agents collaborate to generate candidate proposals; a mandatory deterministic validator (solver + Monte Carlo) decides the numbers; domain experts review via human-in-the-loop, and the system learns from their verdicts.

Status: Early development (plan phase). Not yet usable.

Disclaimer — technical framework only. This project is a technical framework. Organizations that deploy it are themselves responsible for ensuring a valid processing purpose and for any required assessments (DPIA, risk/ROS, security reviews, etc.). The framework ships technical affordances (local-only mode, provenance/audit logging, no silent data egress) to enable compliant use, but makes no compliance guarantees.

Design philosophy

The result will never fit any single customer 100%. The goal is a ~90% genuinely generic core plus clear extension points, so competent people can configure the last mile per customer. We deliberately do not chase the final 10%.

Docs

Stack

Python ≥3.10 · MAF (agent-framework) · uv. Backend profiles: Azure/Foundry (full) + local (fallback).

Develop

uv sync
uv run pytest
uv run ruff check .