portfolio-optimiser/tests/test_semretrieval_loadbearing.py

327 lines
16 KiB
Python

"""S3.1 semretrieval — load-bearing seams (SC2 cosine tie-break, SC5 MAF-free, SC8 no-network).
``semretrieval`` is the only numpy importer in the package and it sits on the MAF-free side of
the D7 fault line. Three guards hold that line, each with a named detach point:
1. **Meta** — the module is registered in ``_MAF_FREE_MODULES``, so the direct-import AST guard
(``test_okf_is_maf_free``) actually scans it. Without this the MAF-free claim is green-but-dead.
2. **Transitive + runtime** — the module body is exec'd standalone AND a ``rank()`` call is made,
then ``sys.modules`` is checked. The AST guard only sees DIRECT imports and only at import
time; a lazy ``from portfolio_optimiser.verdicts import similarity`` INSIDE ``rank`` would sail
past both the AST guard and an import-only probe, and trip only this one.
3. **No network** — an AST sweep for network modules, since a real embeddings client is an
extension point and must never be smuggled into the offline default.
And one load-bearing behavioural seam (SC2): on a 500+ verdict base where two candidates TIE on
the structural score, the cosine term is the only thing that can separate them.
**Detach point: zero/remove the cosine term → CORRECT no longer top-1.**
The pair ties on equal Jaccard over DIFFERENT code sets rather than by being structurally
identical, so both candidates are constructible through ``capture_verdict`` — the path the
framework actually mints on. Plus one regression guard (defect P1): a framework-minted and an
externally-authored verdict that are structurally identical must embed identically, so the
system's own echo of the query can no longer outrank genuine expert prose.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import ast
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
from portfolio_optimiser.semretrieval import (
FakeEmbedder,
HybridRanker,
StructuralRetriever,
cosine,
)
from portfolio_optimiser.verdicts import (
ProposalFeatures,
Verdict,
VerdictStore,
capture_verdict,
similarity,
verdict_from_dict,
verdict_to_dict,
)
_SEMRETRIEVAL = (
Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "src" / "portfolio_optimiser" / "semretrieval.py"
)
# The offline invariant: no verdict data and no proposal text may leave the machine.
_NETWORK_ROOTS = {"socket", "urllib", "http", "requests", "httpx", "ftplib", "smtplib"}
def test_semretrieval_registered_maf_free() -> None:
"""Meta: registered in the MAF-free guard list, so ``test_okf_is_maf_free`` scans it.
Detach point: drop ``semretrieval.py`` from ``_MAF_FREE_MODULES`` → RED."""
from tests.test_okf import _MAF_FREE_MODULES
assert "semretrieval.py" in _MAF_FREE_MODULES
def test_semretrieval_import_and_rank_pull_in_no_maf_and_no_verdicts() -> None:
"""The genuine seam: exec the module body standalone, then actually RANK, then inspect
``sys.modules``.
Ranking is the moment a lazy import would fire — ``StructuralRetriever``/``HybridRanker``
need the structural score, and the design INJECTS it as a callable precisely so that
``verdicts`` (which imports ``agent_framework``) stays out of this module's runtime graph.
The candidates are duck-typed ``SimpleNamespace`` stand-ins, never real ``ProposalFeatures``
/``Verdict`` — building those would import ``verdicts`` in the probe itself and defeat the
very assertion being made.
Detach point: replace the injected ``similarity`` with
``from portfolio_optimiser.verdicts import similarity`` inside ``rank`` → RED."""
check = (
"import importlib.util, sys, types\n"
f"spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location('semretrieval_standalone', {str(_SEMRETRIEVAL)!r})\n"
"mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)\n"
"spec.loader.exec_module(mod)\n"
"\n"
"def feat(codes, measure, saving, desc):\n"
" return types.SimpleNamespace(affected_codes=frozenset(codes), measure_type=measure,\n"
" claimed_saving_nok=saving, description=desc)\n"
"\n"
"query = feat(['05.2'], 'scope_reduction', 220000.0, 'query text')\n"
"candidates = [\n"
" types.SimpleNamespace(id='A', proposal_features=feat(['05.2'], 'scope_reduction', 200000.0, 'a')),\n"
" types.SimpleNamespace(id='B', proposal_features=feat(['09.1'], 'rate_renegotiation', 50000.0, 'b')),\n"
"]\n"
"sim = lambda q, c: 1.0 if q.measure_type == c.measure_type else 0.0\n"
"\n"
"structural = mod.StructuralRetriever(sim).rank(query, candidates, 2)\n"
"assert [v.id for v in structural] == ['A', 'B'], structural\n"
"hybrid = mod.HybridRanker(mod.FakeEmbedder(), sim).rank(query, candidates, 2)\n"
"assert len(hybrid) == 2, hybrid\n"
"\n"
"for name in ('agent_framework', 'mcp', 'portfolio_optimiser.verdicts', 'portfolio_optimiser'):\n"
" assert name not in sys.modules, name + ' leaked into the semretrieval runtime graph'\n"
)
result = subprocess.run([sys.executable, "-c", check], capture_output=True, text=True)
assert result.returncode == 0, result.stderr
def test_semretrieval_imports_no_network_modules() -> None:
"""SC8 — the offline default must not be able to reach the network. Detach point: add
``import urllib.request`` (or any ``_NETWORK_ROOTS`` member) to semretrieval.py → RED."""
tree = ast.parse(_SEMRETRIEVAL.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
imported_roots: set[str] = set()
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, ast.Import):
imported_roots.update(alias.name.split(".")[0] for alias in node.names)
elif isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom) and node.module:
imported_roots.add(node.module.split(".")[0])
leaked = imported_roots & _NETWORK_ROOTS
assert not leaked, f"semretrieval imports network module(s): {sorted(leaked)}"
# --- SC2: the cosine term is load-bearing on a structurally tied 500+ base ---------------------
#
# The pair ties on the STRUCTURAL score while carrying DIFFERENT cost codes — equal Jaccard
# against the query (1/3 each), same measure, same magnitude bucket => similarity 0.6 == 0.6.
# That matters: the previous fixture tied by being structurally IDENTICAL and separated only by
# hand-written prose, a shape the framework cannot mint (``_mint_id`` ignores description, so
# both candidates would share one id and ``VerdictStore.add`` is first-write-wins). Differing in
# codes makes the pair genuinely constructible through ``capture_verdict`` — the real minting
# path — so the proof now runs on data the system can actually produce.
#
# Every feature set carries ``description == measure_type``, which is exactly what both live
# minting paths emit (``run._features_of`` sets ``description=proposal.measure``;
# ``verdicts._features_from_ir`` sets ``description=ir["measure"]``).
_MEASURE = "asfalt"
_QUERY_CODES = frozenset({"05.1", "05.2"})
_CORRECT_CODES = frozenset({"05.1", "07.4"})
_DISTRACTOR_CODES = frozenset({"05.2", "09.8"})
# Unique grep markers: these strings appear nowhere else in the repo, so a stray match cannot
# fake a pass. They ride in the RATIONALE (not the id) because ids are now minted content
# hashes — and because ``format_fewshot`` puts the rationale into the prompt, which is the
# channel the CLI-level proof downstream depends on.
_CORRECT_MARKER = "zz-s31-cosine-tiebreak-4b7e"
_DISTRACTOR_MARKER = "aa-structural-tie-winner"
_QUERY = ProposalFeatures(
affected_codes=_QUERY_CODES,
measure_type=_MEASURE,
claimed_saving_nok=220_000.0,
description=_MEASURE,
)
def _tied_verdict(codes: frozenset[str], decision: str, marker: str) -> Verdict:
"""Structurally TIED with the query — equal Jaccard, same measure, same magnitude bucket —
but on a different code set, so the canonical embedding string differs and cosine has
something to separate. Minted through ``capture_verdict``, never hand-assigned."""
return capture_verdict(
ProposalFeatures(
affected_codes=codes,
measure_type=_MEASURE,
claimed_saving_nok=200_000.0, # same bucket [100k, 500k) as the query
description=_MEASURE,
),
decision,
f"prior ruling reached via {marker}",
)
# Minted ids, resolved once so the ordering property below is stated in terms of real values.
_CORRECT_ID = _tied_verdict(_CORRECT_CODES, "approved", _CORRECT_MARKER).id
_DISTRACTOR_ID = _tied_verdict(_DISTRACTOR_CODES, "rejected", _DISTRACTOR_MARKER).id
def _synthetic_base(n: int = 500) -> list[Verdict]:
"""Two structurally tied candidates plus ``n - 2`` strictly-lower-scoring fillers, so the
ranking has to hold up at a realistic base size rather than on a three-item toy store."""
# Not tuned prose any more: the two candidates differ in their CODE SETS, and the cosine
# ordering over a sha256 projection is deterministic but semantically arbitrary. The proof of
# the seam is the detach control below — that removing the cosine term flips the ranking —
# never the plausibility of either candidate.
correct = _tied_verdict(_CORRECT_CODES, "approved", _CORRECT_MARKER)
distractor = _tied_verdict(_DISTRACTOR_CODES, "rejected", _DISTRACTOR_MARKER)
fillers = [
Verdict(
id=f"filler-{i:04d}",
proposal_features=ProposalFeatures(
affected_codes=frozenset({f"9{i % 90:02d}.1"}), # no overlap -> jaccard 0
measure_type="rate_renegotiation", # no measure match
claimed_saving_nok=5_000_000.0, # different magnitude bucket
description=f"unrelated filler measure {i}",
),
decision="rejected",
rationale="filler",
)
for i in range(n - 2)
]
# Interleaved so a rank that accidentally preserved input order would not pass by luck.
return [*fillers[: (n - 2) // 2], distractor, correct, *fillers[(n - 2) // 2 :]]
def test_sc2_fixture_preconditions_hold() -> None:
"""Every property the SC2 proof rests on, asserted rather than assumed: the pair is
structurally tied on DIFFERENT code sets, both ids are minted by ``capture_verdict``, CORRECT
loses the id tie-break, and cosine favours CORRECT.
The code-set assertion is the one that keeps this fixture honest — a pair that tied by being
structurally identical could not be minted at all, since ``_mint_id`` would collapse them onto
one id and the store would keep only the first."""
base = _synthetic_base()
correct = next(v for v in base if v.id == _CORRECT_ID)
distractor = next(v for v in base if v.id == _DISTRACTOR_ID)
# Tied structurally, but NOT structurally identical.
assert similarity(_QUERY, correct.proposal_features) == similarity(
_QUERY, distractor.proposal_features
)
assert correct.proposal_features.affected_codes != distractor.proposal_features.affected_codes
# The framework-minted shape: description carries the measure, on every feature set.
for features in (_QUERY, correct.proposal_features, distractor.proposal_features):
assert features.description == features.measure_type == _MEASURE
# Ids are content hashes of the features, not hand-written — re-minting reproduces them.
assert correct.id != distractor.id
assert correct.id == capture_verdict(correct.proposal_features, "approved", "re-mint").id
assert distractor.id == capture_verdict(distractor.proposal_features, "rejected", "re-mint").id
assert _DISTRACTOR_ID < _CORRECT_ID # structural id tie-break favours the distractor
embedder = FakeEmbedder()
query_vector = embedder(_QUERY)
assert cosine(query_vector, embedder(correct.proposal_features)) > cosine(
query_vector, embedder(distractor.proposal_features)
)
assert len(base) >= 500
def test_minted_and_authored_verdicts_embed_identically_on_a_structural_tie() -> None:
"""REGRESSION (defect P1) — a framework-minted verdict and an externally-authored one that
are structurally identical must now embed IDENTICALLY.
Before ``description`` left the embedding, the framework minted every feature set with
``description == measure`` while a human/persona verdict arrived through the inbox carrying
real prose. On a mixed store the system's own echo of the query scored ~1.0 and genuine expert
prose ~0.72, so the hybrid pushed real rulings BELOW the framework's restatement of its own
question — the inverse of the feature's purpose, and the same self-contamination the Step-8
promotion gate exists to prevent.
Detach point: restore ``features.description`` to ``_canonical_feature_string`` → RED."""
features = ProposalFeatures(
affected_codes=_CORRECT_CODES,
measure_type=_MEASURE,
claimed_saving_nok=200_000.0,
description=_MEASURE, # the shape run._features_of / _features_from_ir emit
)
minted = capture_verdict(features, "approved", "framework-captured ruling")
# The same proposal as an expert would file it: identical structure, human prose.
authored = verdict_from_dict(
{
**verdict_to_dict(minted),
"rationale": "the base course reduction was accepted on the school approach",
"proposal_features": {
**verdict_to_dict(minted)["proposal_features"],
"description": "shallower asphalt base layer along the school approach",
},
}
)
embedder = FakeEmbedder()
query_vector = embedder(_QUERY)
# The load-bearing claim: the two embed to the SAME vector, bit for bit.
assert np.array_equal(
embedder(minted.proposal_features), embedder(authored.proposal_features)
), "prose still leaks into the embedding — the framework's own echo can outrank expert text"
# ...and therefore rank identically. Compared at the ranking key's own tolerance, not on raw
# equality: ``np.dot`` over two separately allocated but bit-identical vectors can differ by
# one ulp, because the reduction path varies with buffer alignment. That is precisely why
# ``HybridRanker`` orders on ``(-round(score, 9), id)`` rather than the raw score — asserting
# bit-equality here would pin a property the system deliberately does not rely on.
assert round(cosine(query_vector, embedder(minted.proposal_features)), 9) == round(
cosine(query_vector, embedder(authored.proposal_features)), 9
)
def test_sc2_control_structural_ranking_puts_the_distractor_first() -> None:
"""CONTROL — without a semantic term the CORRECT verdict is unreachable. If this ever goes
green with CORRECT on top, the positive below proves nothing."""
base = _synthetic_base()
top = StructuralRetriever(similarity).rank(_QUERY, base, 3)
assert top[0].id == _DISTRACTOR_ID
assert top[0].id != _CORRECT_ID
def test_sc2_control_hybrid_at_weight_zero_is_the_detach_point() -> None:
"""DETACH — zeroing the cosine weight collapses the hybrid onto the structural ranking and
the CORRECT verdict falls back out of the top slot. This is the seam being load-bearing:
remove the cosine contribution and the positive test below turns RED."""
base = _synthetic_base()
detached = HybridRanker(FakeEmbedder(), similarity, weight=0.0).rank(_QUERY, base, 3)
assert detached[0].id == _DISTRACTOR_ID
assert detached[0].id != _CORRECT_ID
def test_sc2_positive_cosine_breaks_the_structural_tie() -> None:
"""POSITIVE — with the cosine term active, the semantically closer verdict wins the tie it
loses structurally, on a 500+ base."""
base = _synthetic_base()
top = HybridRanker(FakeEmbedder(), similarity).rank(_QUERY, base, 3)
assert top[0].id == _CORRECT_ID
def test_sc2_positive_holds_through_the_store_seam() -> None:
"""The same result through the real entry point: a store with the hybrid installed must
surface CORRECT, since that is the path ``run.py --semantic-retrieval`` drives."""
store = VerdictStore(verdicts=_synthetic_base())
store.retriever = HybridRanker(FakeEmbedder(), similarity)
assert store.retrieve(_QUERY, k=3)[0].id == _CORRECT_ID
# ...and the untouched default store still cannot see it.
assert VerdictStore(verdicts=_synthetic_base()).retrieve(_QUERY, k=3)[0].id == _DISTRACTOR_ID