Three seams, one commit: A, B and C touch the same four modules (run.py carries
the debate task, the grounding composition and the announcement; okf.py carries
one reference-number vocabulary read by both A and B), so splitting them into
three commits would have meant hunk-level staging of entangled files. Stated
rather than silently restructured.
A — the declaration answers with the DOCUMENT's own words. Measured: 13
declarations over round 3 and P17b, not one naming a fasit concept, while the
tool answered {"declared": true, ...} by echoing the caller's own arguments. It
now returns the document's title and req_number, read off Bundle.context_files
(so the type: verdict layer can never be named back), plus the sentence saying
what the declaration binds. A path the base carries as no concept answers with
empty strings rather than refusing. The commission's success_criteria now reach
the DEBATE task through mandate.criteria_block, the one renderer, empty when
there are none — which is what keeps every un-commissioned prompt, and the
golden, byte-identical.
B — a clause number is not a price. THE ORDER'S OWN RULE WAS FELLED BY
MEASUREMENT: it asks to refuse a code that IS declared req_number/prosessnr,
and neither of its two known positives is. n500 declares seksjon 10.4.1..10.4.4
but never the bare 10.4; r761 declares 2727 prosessnr and 2753 seksjon, none of
them 1.10.4, which occurs once, as prose ("iht. vegnormal N200 kap. 1.10.4").
The COMPLEMENT fires on both and closes the hole _ground_against_input already
admits in writing -- "it fails OPEN on a coincidental match". Unanchored run +
requirement-shaped code + the base declares a vocabulary + the code is not in
it -> refused, naming the denominator. All five of kontrakt-sorasen's real
process codes ARE declared and pass, which is what keeps the one context set
built on real codes measurable. Replayed over all 24 codes of round 3 + P17b:
exactly the two known positives flip validated -> rejected, 22 unchanged.
C — a parse failure no longer burns the round ledger blind. _fetch_parsed takes
a BUILDER instead of a finished message list, so the retry carries the parse
reason; measured, kontrakt-sorasen-04 spent 11 of 12 rounds re-asking the same
question. And announced_subject names the routed bases instead of saying "the
portfolio" for a two-base commission.
Suite 1807/5 (from 1781, +26, 0 removed), golden demo-transcript.stdout
BYTE-UNCHANGED (shasum -a 1 of the CONTENT = ea8c534773acdbe41ae68f2c55724d69aaf8be4f),
ruff and mypy clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
234 lines
11 KiB
Python
234 lines
11 KiB
Python
"""P20 DEL A — the requirement that is RIGHT, and the commission's criteria reaching the reader.
|
|
|
|
**The measured silence, three rounds and one multi-base pass deep.** P19 DEL A made a direction
|
|
NAME the requirement that binds it and made the run refuse a declaration naming a path it never
|
|
opened. The declarations then happened — and MEASURED (P19 round 3: 9 declarations over 5 paid
|
|
runs; P17b: 4 over one two-base pass) **not one of them named a fasit concept**. The rung works;
|
|
what nothing asked for was that the requirement be the RIGHT one. Two halves were missing:
|
|
|
|
* the tool answered ``{"declared": true, ...}`` to every accepted declaration, echoing back the
|
|
caller's own three arguments. A model that had declared a requirement about something else was
|
|
told, in the only words it got, that it had succeeded;
|
|
* the commission's own statement of what a good answer looks like — ``Mandate.success_criteria`` —
|
|
reached ``announce`` and NOTHING else (P19 F2). It was printed for a human and withheld from the
|
|
only reader who could act on it.
|
|
|
|
What each arm pins:
|
|
|
|
(a) A1 — the reply carries the DOCUMENT's own ``title`` and ``req_number``, read off the base, plus
|
|
the sentence that says what the declaration BINDS. Without the document's own words the reply
|
|
cannot contradict a wrong declaration, which is the whole correction;
|
|
(b) A1 — a path the base carries as no navigated concept (``index.md`` is the reachable case)
|
|
answers with empty strings rather than raising: the read trace has already accepted the
|
|
declaration, and turning "I cannot restate your title" into a refusal would fail a declaration
|
|
the run's own evidence proves was read;
|
|
(c) A1 — the reply is read off ``Bundle.context_files``, so a ``type: verdict`` document can never
|
|
be named back by title. The one layer no listing names stays unnamed even in an answer;
|
|
(d) A2 — ``criteria_block`` is the ONE renderer, and it is EMPTY without criteria. That omission is
|
|
what keeps every prompt of every un-commissioned run byte-identical, the demo's included;
|
|
(e) A2 — the criteria reach the DEBATE's task message, the prompt where ``declare_requirement`` is
|
|
available. Asserted on the text the client actually received, never on the composer;
|
|
(f) A2 — a run with NO mandate sends the task message byte-identically to before, which is the
|
|
half that keeps ``demo-transcript.stdout`` unchanged and is asserted here rather than left to
|
|
the golden;
|
|
(g) A3 — the navigator instruction and the tool description both name the ``read_dir(filter=...)``
|
|
route with a worked example. A description that lies about the body IS the model's instruction
|
|
(the Fase-3 class), and here the body is new.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser import explore, okf
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser.explore import DeclaredRequirement, ToolCall, navigator_tools
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser.mandate import Approach, Mandate, criteria_block
|
|
|
|
_EXAMPLES = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples"
|
|
_TUNNEL = _EXAMPLES / "tunnel-hauglia"
|
|
_BYGG = _EXAMPLES / "bygg-energi-mikro"
|
|
_PID = "BYGG-KONTOR-NORD"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _wired(bundle_dir: Path) -> tuple[dict[str, Any], list[ToolCall], list[DeclaredRequirement]]:
|
|
opened: list[ToolCall] = []
|
|
declared: list[DeclaredRequirement] = []
|
|
tools = navigator_tools((str(bundle_dir),), opened=opened, requirements=declared)
|
|
return {t.name: t for t in tools}, opened, declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _declare(tools: dict[str, Any], opened: list[ToolCall], base: str, path: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
|
"""Read it the way a run does, then declare it — the (b) path of P19 DEL A."""
|
|
opened.append(ToolCall(name="read_file", bundle_id=base, path=path))
|
|
return tools["declare_requirement"].func(bundle_id=base, path=path, ref="Krav 4.1.2-1")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _base_with_a_requirement(root: Path) -> Path:
|
|
"""A base declaring its own ``req_number`` — the form the delivered N corpora carry.
|
|
|
|
Crafted rather than taken from ``shared/examples``: MEASURED, no example base declares a
|
|
``req_number`` at all, so an arm built on one of them could not tell a reply that reads the
|
|
document from one that returns an empty string.
|
|
"""
|
|
base = root / "n-mini"
|
|
base.mkdir()
|
|
(base / "index.md").write_text(
|
|
"---\nbundle_id: n-mini\n---\n\n- [Krav](krav.md) — one requirement.\n", encoding="utf-8"
|
|
)
|
|
(base / "krav.md").write_text(
|
|
"---\ntype: Krav\ntitle: Krav 4.1.2-1 Rundkjoring\nreq_number: Krav 4.1.2-1\n"
|
|
"seksjon: '4.1.2'\n---\n\nEn rundkjoring skal ha …\n",
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
return base
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# (a)-(c) the reply the model can be contradicted by
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_reply_carries_the_documents_own_title_and_number(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""(a) The base's words, not the caller's — the only thing that can say "wrong one"."""
|
|
base = _base_with_a_requirement(tmp_path)
|
|
tools, opened, declared = _wired(base)
|
|
answer = _declare(tools, opened, "n-mini", "krav.md")
|
|
assert answer["title"] == "Krav 4.1.2-1 Rundkjoring"
|
|
assert answer["req_number"] == "Krav 4.1.2-1"
|
|
assert "is the requirement the proposal rests on" in answer["binds"]
|
|
assert declared == [DeclaredRequirement(bundle_id="n-mini", path="krav.md", ref="Krav 4.1.2-1")]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_path_that_is_no_concept_answers_with_empty_strings(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""(b) Accepted-but-unrestatable is not a refusal; the read trace already ruled."""
|
|
base = _base_with_a_requirement(tmp_path)
|
|
tools, opened, _declared = _wired(base)
|
|
answer = _declare(tools, opened, "n-mini", "index.md")
|
|
assert answer["declared"] is True
|
|
assert (answer["title"], answer["req_number"]) == ("", "")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_verdict_document_is_never_named_back_by_title(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""(c) Read off ``context_files``, the property that drops the ``type: verdict`` layer."""
|
|
base = _base_with_a_requirement(tmp_path)
|
|
(base / "dom.md").write_text(
|
|
"---\ntype: verdict\ntitle: A PRIOR EXPERT JUDGEMENT\nid: v1\n---\n\napproved.\n",
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
tools, opened, _declared = _wired(base)
|
|
answer = _declare(tools, opened, "n-mini", "dom.md")
|
|
assert answer["declared"] is True
|
|
assert answer["title"] == "", "the verdict layer must not be readable through this answer"
|
|
# The control: the SAME base answers the concept's title, so the empty string above is the
|
|
# layer being excluded rather than the reader being broken.
|
|
assert _declare(tools, opened, "n-mini", "krav.md")["title"] == "Krav 4.1.2-1 Rundkjoring"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_tunnel_example_answers_its_own_title_and_no_number() -> None:
|
|
"""(a) control on a REAL example base: title present, reference number honestly absent."""
|
|
tools, opened, _declared = _wired(_TUNNEL)
|
|
path = okf.navigate_bundle(str(_TUNNEL)).context_files[0].name
|
|
answer = _declare(tools, opened, "tunnel-hauglia", path)
|
|
assert answer["title"].startswith("Kilder: tunnelbelysning")
|
|
assert answer["req_number"] == "", "this base declares none, and the reply must not invent one"
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# (d)-(f) the criteria reaching the prompt
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_criteria_renderer_is_empty_without_criteria() -> None:
|
|
"""(d) Omission, never an empty heading — the ``announce`` rule, and the golden's guarantee."""
|
|
assert criteria_block("") == ""
|
|
rendered = criteria_block("a saving the price schedule can carry")
|
|
assert "a saving the price schedule can carry" in rendered
|
|
assert rendered.startswith("\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_commissions_criteria_reach_the_debate_task(monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch) -> None:
|
|
"""(e) Asserted on what the CLIENT received, never on the composer."""
|
|
sent = _run_and_capture_task(
|
|
monkeypatch,
|
|
mandate=Mandate(
|
|
objective="cut cost",
|
|
approaches=(Approach(id="a1", label="L", description="D"),),
|
|
success_criteria="SENTINEL-CRITERION-ONLY-THE-COMMISSION-CARRIES",
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
assert "SENTINEL-CRITERION-ONLY-THE-COMMISSION-CARRIES" in sent[0]
|
|
assert "What the commissioner counts as success" in sent[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_run_without_a_mandate_sends_the_task_unchanged(monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch) -> None:
|
|
"""(f) The byte-identity half. Without it (e) could be satisfied by always appending."""
|
|
sent = _run_and_capture_task(monkeypatch, mandate=None)
|
|
assert sent[0].startswith(f"Find a cost-saving measure for {_PID}.\nContext:\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _run_and_capture_task(monkeypatch: pytest.MonkeyPatch, *, mandate: Mandate | None) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""Drive a real ``run_project`` and capture every prompt the debate's clients received.
|
|
|
|
The same recording-factory seam ``test_debate_navigation_cost_loadbearing`` measures S2c with:
|
|
the assertion is on what the CLIENT was handed, never on ``criteria_block``'s return value, so
|
|
a renderer wired nowhere cannot satisfy it.
|
|
"""
|
|
import asyncio
|
|
|
|
from agent_framework import BaseChatClient
|
|
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser.run import run_project
|
|
from portfolio_optimiser.simulation import ScriptedChatClient
|
|
|
|
sink: list[str] = []
|
|
valid = (
|
|
'{"measure":"LED-retrofit","affected_items":'
|
|
'[{"code":"ENERGI-TOTAL-EL","quantity":300000,"unit_cost":1.0}],'
|
|
'"claimed_saving_nok":30000}'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def factory(role: str) -> BaseChatClient:
|
|
client = ScriptedChatClient(
|
|
"Reasoning holds.\nVERDICT: APPROVE" if role == "checker" else valid, role=role
|
|
)
|
|
original = client._inner_get_response # type: ignore[attr-defined]
|
|
|
|
def recording(*, messages, options, stream=False, **kwargs): # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
|
|
sink.append("\n".join(getattr(m, "text", "") or "" for m in messages))
|
|
return original(messages=messages, options=options, stream=stream, **kwargs)
|
|
|
|
client._inner_get_response = recording # type: ignore[attr-defined,method-assign]
|
|
return client
|
|
|
|
asyncio.run(
|
|
run_project(
|
|
_PID,
|
|
"local",
|
|
docs_dir=str(_BYGG),
|
|
bundle_dir=str(_BYGG),
|
|
verdict_input={"decision": "approved", "rationale": "expert reviewed (test)"},
|
|
client_factory=factory,
|
|
mandate=mandate,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
assert sink, "the debate never reached the client"
|
|
return sink
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# (g) the instruction that describes the new body
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_both_descriptions_name_the_filter_route() -> None:
|
|
"""(g) A description that lies about the body IS the instruction (the Fase-3 class)."""
|
|
instruction = explore._INSTRUCTIONS[explore.HYPOTHESISER_ROLE]
|
|
assert "read_dir a 'filter' word" in instruction
|
|
assert "Krav 4.1.2-1" in instruction, "the worked example is what makes the route concrete"
|
|
tools = {t.name: t for t in navigator_tools((str(_TUNNEL),), opened=[], requirements=[])}
|
|
description = tools["declare_requirement"].description or ""
|
|
assert "filter='rundkjoring'" in description
|
|
assert "own title and number" in description
|