portfolio-optimiser/tests/test_falsification_verdict_loadbearing.py
2026-09-02 20:36:54 +02:00

269 lines
12 KiB
Python

"""The falsification-verdict seam — load-bearing gates for reading OKF provenance.
This module opens with the ONE thing that has to be captured before any decoder exists: the
bytes today's ``bundle_context`` renders from a **block-form** provenance bundle. Later steps
add a decoder that reads ``verified``/``sources`` in that form; this gate is what proves the
decoder did not move the read-context on its way in.
The comparison is **byte-for-byte**, with no trailing-whitespace normalisation. The commons
nav-goldens normalise because commons owns their line endings and this repo consumes them
through a pull-only subtree; ``tests/golden/block-form-provenance/`` is repo-owned, so the
stricter comparison is available and is what the criterion asks for.
The resolver below is LOCAL on purpose. ``tests/test_okf.py::_nav_golden`` hard-codes
``shared/examples/`` (``test_okf.py:51``) and lives in a module this work must not touch, so
reusing it would mean editing a frozen module to reach a repo-owned fixture.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import shutil
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
import pytest
from portfolio_optimiser import okf, tools, verdicts
_GOLDEN_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "tests" / "golden" / "block-form-provenance"
def _block_form_golden() -> tuple[str, str]:
"""The repo-owned block-form case: ``(bundle_dir, expected_read_context)``."""
return (
str(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle"),
(_GOLDEN_DIR / "expected-read-context.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8"),
)
def test_block_form_bundle_renders_the_captured_bytes() -> None:
"""Navigation is TOLERANT of block-form provenance, and these are the bytes it produces.
Two claims in one arm, and both are load-bearing. First, ``navigate_bundle`` reaches every
file and skips nothing — a block ``verified:`` sequence is ordinary frontmatter to a
line-oriented parser, so it must not break navigation, and ``skipped`` being empty is the
positive statement that no link was silently passed over. Second, the rendered read-context
is byte-identical to the committed fasit. The fasit was generated by the code that predates
any decoder work: if it were regenerated afterwards, the comparison would prove an
implementation identical to itself and nothing else.
"""
bundle_dir, expected = _block_form_golden()
bundle = okf.navigate_bundle(bundle_dir)
assert bundle.skipped == (), (
f"navigation skipped a link it should have followed: {bundle.skipped}"
)
assert [f.name for f in bundle.files] == ["index.md", "attested.md", "multi-verified.md"]
assert okf.bundle_context(bundle) == expected
# --- Step 7: the falsification verdict, with the third state carrying its reason ---------------
_ENERGI_BUNDLE = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "shared" / "examples" / "bygg-energi-mikro"
def _present_document(tmp_path: Path) -> Path:
"""A REAL flow-form document, produced by our own writer — never a mock.
All three arms below read committed or freshly-written files, because the property under test
is what the reader does with bytes on disk, and a stubbed reader would test the stub.
"""
dst = tmp_path / "bundle"
shutil.copytree(_ENERGI_BUNDLE, dst)
return verdicts.promote_verdict(
str(dst),
verdicts.Verdict(
id="EVIDENCE-PRESENT",
proposal_features=verdicts.bundle_candidate_features(str(dst)),
decision="approved",
rationale="godkjent",
),
approver="process:fixture-check",
experiment="exp-B",
timestamp="2026-06-30T09:00:00Z",
)
def test_a_flow_form_document_is_present_and_tiered(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""CONTROL — without it, every arm below is satisfied by a reader that always says "absent"."""
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path))
assert evidence.state == "present"
assert evidence.tier == "machine-confirmed"
assert evidence.reason is None, (
"a present state has no reason to carry, and must not invent one"
)
assert evidence.items_seen == 1
def test_a_document_without_the_key_is_absent_and_carries_no_tier() -> None:
"""``absent`` is what a document that never claimed verification says — and it is NOT the same
fact as ``unreadable``."""
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "index.md")
assert evidence.state == "absent"
assert evidence.tier is None
assert evidence.reason is None
assert evidence.items_seen == 0
def test_a_block_form_document_is_unreadable_and_says_WHY() -> None:
"""The third state, and the arm asserts the REASON, not merely the state.
A collapsed ``unreadable`` → ``absent`` is a verdict on missing evidence presented as evidence
of absence. Asserting only ``state != "present"`` would stay green against exactly that
collapse, so the reason token is what this arm pins.
"""
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "attested.md")
assert evidence.state == "unreadable"
assert evidence.reason == "block-sequence"
assert evidence.items_seen == 1
def test_a_two_entry_block_document_yields_NO_tier() -> None:
"""A tier here would be the measured second-entry-wins defect surfacing.
``multi-verified.md`` carries a human sign-off FIRST and a process entry SECOND. A reader that
limped past the block form and kept the last entry it saw would report ``machine-confirmed``
for a concept a human signed — downgrading the tier with nothing failing. The honest answer to
an unreadable value is no tier at all.
"""
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "multi-verified.md")
assert evidence.state == "unreadable"
assert evidence.tier is None
assert evidence.items_seen == 2
def test_evidence_notice_is_None_when_there_is_nothing_to_say(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""Omission, never an empty row — the ``cost_baseline_notice`` precedent."""
assert okf.evidence_notice(okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path))) is None
def test_evidence_notice_prints_the_reason_TOKEN_itself() -> None:
"""No second display vocabulary. A prose translation here would be free to drift from
``ProvenanceReason``, and the drifted copy is the one the operator would read."""
notice = okf.evidence_notice(okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "attested.md"))
assert notice is not None
assert "block-sequence" in notice
assert "items_seen=1" in notice
# --- Amendment A: the K5 threshold ------------------------------------------------------------
def test_admits_falsification_refuses_a_state_that_is_not_present() -> None:
"""AMENDMENT A, first conjunct — a verdict may not rest on evidence that was never read."""
assert not okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "attested.md"))
assert not okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "index.md"))
def test_admits_falsification_refuses_an_unverified_tier() -> None:
"""AMENDMENT A, second conjunct — its OWN arm, because one arm cannot separate two conjuncts.
**This state is not reachable through ``evidence_for`` today, and that is measured, not
assumed:** ``decode_flow_value`` refuses an empty flow sequence, so a ``present`` value always
carries at least one entry naming an actor, and ``trust_tier`` therefore never answers
``unverified`` for it. The conjunct is DEFENSIVE, which is precisely why it needs an arm of its
own — a single arm over a reachable document would leave it untested, and an untested conjunct
is one a later simplification deletes without anything going red.
"""
unverified = okf.FalsificationEvidence(
file="crafted.md", state="present", tier="unverified", reason=None, entries=(), items_seen=0
)
assert not okf.admits_falsification(unverified)
def test_admits_falsification_ADMITS_the_positive_case(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""CONTROL — an always-refusing threshold passes both negative arms and is worthless."""
assert okf.admits_falsification(okf.evidence_for(_present_document(tmp_path)))
def test_a_discounted_concept_reports_the_TRIPLE_not_merely_the_refusal() -> None:
"""AMENDMENT A — "why it was discounted" is the operative fact.
A dropped concept and a discounted one are different facts, and only the second is honest about
what was read. Asserting that admission was denied says nothing about which of them happened;
the triple ``(state, reason, items_seen)`` is what makes the difference legible.
"""
evidence = okf.evidence_for(_GOLDEN_DIR / "bundle" / "multi-verified.md")
assert not okf.admits_falsification(evidence)
assert (evidence.state, evidence.reason, evidence.items_seen) == (
"unreadable",
"block-sequence",
2,
)
# --- Step 8: the adjudication state, named and never collapsed to absent ------------------------
def _concept(text: str) -> Path:
path = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="okf-adjudication-")) / "c.md"
path.write_text(text, encoding="utf-8")
return path
@pytest.mark.parametrize("value", ["proposed", "adjudicated"])
def test_the_two_named_states_are_read_back(value: str) -> None:
"""Hand-written fixtures, to the contract as delivered.
**Honesty limit, stated:** these are written to the contract, NOT produced by
``llm-ingestion-okf``. Integration against the producer's own golden is later work and is not
claimed here.
"""
assert okf.adjudication_for(
_concept(f"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: {value}\n---\nb\n")
) == (value)
def test_a_missing_key_is_unknown_and_NEVER_absent() -> None:
"""The third token is the whole step.
A concept that does not carry the key means *we did not learn whether this was adjudicated* —
an older bundle. Collapsing that into "it was not adjudicated" is the same defect as collapsing
``unreadable`` into ``absent`` one layer up, and the same defect removed from
``RunResult.verdict``.
"""
assert okf.adjudication_for(_concept("---\ntype: concept\ntitle: x\n---\nb\n")) == "unknown"
@pytest.mark.parametrize("value", ["ratified", "PROPOSED", ""])
def test_a_value_outside_the_vocabulary_is_refused_by_name(value: str) -> None:
"""Validation, never repair. Mapping an unknown value to ``unknown`` would invent the very
state this contract exists to keep honest — and an EMPTY value is present-but-empty, which is a
different fact from absent and must not be folded into it either."""
with pytest.raises(okf.AdjudicationValueError) as excinfo:
okf.adjudication_for(_concept(f"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: {value}\n---\nb\n"))
assert "adjudication" in str(excinfo.value)
def test_the_carrier_hands_the_STATE_to_a_hypothesiser(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""THE LOAD-BEARING ARM — the gate is the CARRIER, not the enum.
An accessor that returns three tokens which nothing propagates is a vocabulary, not a seam. So
the assertion is on what the tool actually hands back: a payload carrying the state. A carrier
that returned the concept without its state would leave ``adjudication_for`` correct and the
hypothesiser none the wiser, which is the exact shape this step exists to close.
"""
bundle = tmp_path / "bundle"
bundle.mkdir()
(bundle / "a.md").write_text(
"---\ntype: concept\nadjudication: proposed\n---\nbody\n", encoding="utf-8"
)
carrier = tools.make_adjudication_tool(str(bundle))
payload = tools.adjudication_payload(str(bundle), "a.md")
assert payload["adjudication"] == "proposed"
assert payload["concept"] == "a.md"
assert carrier.name == "concept_adjudication_state"
def test_the_carrier_is_a_library_primitive_not_wired_into_the_run(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""``run.py`` must not import the carrier: wiring it into the run surface would move the
byte-pinned demo transcript, and would make the state reachable only by reading a run's output
rather than by calling a function."""
run_source = (
Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "src" / "portfolio_optimiser" / "run.py"
).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
assert "make_adjudication_tool" not in run_source
assert "adjudication_payload" not in run_source