portfolio-optimiser/tests/test_portfolio.py
2026-06-26 15:05:41 +02:00

253 lines
12 KiB
Python

"""Fase 3 — sequential portfolio fan-out over N independent projects.
Covers the success criteria: SC2 (fan-out + aggregate sums), SC4 (shared store accumulates +
load-bearing cross-project retrieval), SC3 (load-bearing meter-isolation detach), SC7 (both
profiles offline + resolve_model teeth), SC1 (new project via config only + no-hardcoded-id src
guard), SC6 (extension doc exists + references the seams).
Pattern: tests/test_vertical_slice_e2e.py:28 (run_project call shape). The project-aware
synthetic client (conftest ``make_portfolio_client_factory``) selects each project's reply by
scanning the prompt for its id, so one production-shaped factory serves the whole portfolio.
"""
import pytest
from portfolio_optimiser.run import PortfolioResult, RunResult, run_portfolio, run_project
from portfolio_optimiser.validator import Rejection
# The synthetic reply IS the proposal: generate._parse_ir builds affected_items (each with its
# own quantity/unit_cost) straight from this JSON, and the validator's P90 = 0.30 x Σ(qty·unit_cost)
# ONLY when ``assumptions`` is empty (degenerate Monte Carlo, validator.py:108-113). All three
# replies therefore OMIT ``assumptions`` and carry explicit magnitudes so each
# ``claimed_saving_nok`` <= P90. Verified against validator + ir:
# FV42-GSV-E1 Σ=1,482,500 P90=444,750 claimed 200,000 -> validates
# RV13-RAS-TP Σ= 756,000 P90=226,800 claimed 130,000 -> validates (decoy)
# BRU-LAKS-REHAB Σ=2,580,500 P90=774,150 claimed 210,000 -> validates
# ``measure`` is byte-identical "Reduce scope" for FV42+BRU (measure-match is exact string
# equality, verdicts.py:68) and "Material substitution" for the decoy, so the BRU<->FV42 pair
# overlaps (shared code 05.2 + measure + magnitude bucket) while the decoy does not.
REPLIES = {
"FV42-GSV-E1": (
'{"measure":"Reduce scope","affected_items":['
'{"code":"05.2","quantity":4300,"unit_cost":215},'
'{"code":"03.1","quantity":1800,"unit_cost":310}],"claimed_saving_nok":200000}'
),
"RV13-RAS-TP": (
'{"measure":"Material substitution","affected_items":['
'{"code":"88.2","quantity":180,"unit_cost":4200}],"claimed_saving_nok":130000}'
),
"BRU-LAKS-REHAB": (
'{"measure":"Reduce scope","affected_items":['
'{"code":"05.2","quantity":4300,"unit_cost":215},'
'{"code":"07.4","quantity":2400,"unit_cost":690}],"claimed_saving_nok":210000}'
),
}
_PORTFOLIO_IDS = ["FV42-GSV-E1", "RV13-RAS-TP", "BRU-LAKS-REHAB"]
async def test_a_fanout_returns_one_runresult_per_project(
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
"""SC2: run_portfolio fans out sequentially, one RunResult per project, and aggregates the
validated/rejected counts + claimed-saving + token sums."""
result = await run_portfolio(
_PORTFOLIO_IDS,
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
)
assert isinstance(result, PortfolioResult)
assert len(result.runs) == 3
assert all(isinstance(r, RunResult) for r in result.runs)
# Aggregate pinned to the fixture constants above (all three validate).
assert result.validated_count == 3
assert result.rejected_count == 0
assert result.sum_claimed_saving_nok == 540000
# Explicit element-wise wiring check (not the field's own sum() definition).
expected_tokens = (
result.runs[0].provenance.token_usage
+ result.runs[1].provenance.token_usage
+ result.runs[2].provenance.token_usage
)
assert result.sum_token_usage == expected_tokens
assert all(r.provenance.token_usage > 0 for r in result.runs)
async def test_a2_unknown_project_id_raises(make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store) -> None:
"""The unknown-id error path: an id absent from the loaded portfolio raises ValueError."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
await run_portfolio(
["NOPE-DOES-NOT-EXIST"],
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
)
async def test_a3_rejected_proposal_excluded_from_aggregate(
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
"""F2 (rejection arm, previously unexercised): one project's claim exceeds its P90, so the
validator REJECTS it (FV42 800000 > P90 444750, <= Σ 1,482,500), while RV13+BRU validate.
rejected_count counts it and the validated-only sum (run.py:241) EXCLUDES its claim. Also the
F1 portfolio seam: provenance.model mirrors the injected client across all N records."""
replies = {**REPLIES, "FV42-GSV-E1": REPLIES["FV42-GSV-E1"].replace("200000", "800000")}
result = await run_portfolio(
_PORTFOLIO_IDS,
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(replies),
)
assert result.rejected_count == 1
assert result.validated_count == 2
# Validated-only sum EXCLUDES the rejected 800000 (run.py:241): 130000 + 210000.
assert result.sum_claimed_saving_nok == 340000
rejected = [r for r in result.runs if isinstance(r.outcome, Rejection)]
assert len(rejected) == 1
assert rejected[0].outcome.proposal.claimed_saving_nok == 800000 # carried, not summed
assert rejected[0].provenance.validator_decision == "rejected"
# F1 portfolio seam: the injected client's model is stamped across ALL N records.
assert all(r.provenance.model == "synthetic" for r in result.runs)
async def test_b_shared_store_accumulates_and_surfaces_prior_verdict(
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
"""SC4 (load-bearing, not mere non-emptiness): the ONE shared store accumulates a distinct
verdict per project (3 -> 3 pairwise-distinct ids), and the cross-project ExpeL retrieval
surfaces the STRUCTURAL match — BRU (runs[2]) retrieves FV42's verdict (runs[0]), since
sim(BRU,FV42)=0.60 (shared code 05.2 + identical "Reduce scope" measure + same magnitude
bucket) ranks above the RV13 decoy at sim(BRU,decoy)=0.15. If retrieval ranking breaks, or
two proposals collide to a single minted id, this fails — it asserts the specific match, not
store-non-empty."""
result = await run_portfolio(
_PORTFOLIO_IDS,
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
)
assert len(result.store.verdicts) == 3
ids = [v.id for v in result.store.verdicts]
assert len(set(ids)) == 3 # pairwise distinct minted ids (no collision)
# BRU surfaces FV42 (the structural match), ranked above the decoy.
assert result.runs[2].retrieved[0].id == result.runs[0].verdict.id
async def test_c_execution_state_isolation_is_load_bearing(
make_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
"""SC3 (cap-independent automatic detach guard): each project's execution state (the budget
meter) is built FRESH per run, so per-project token_usage is its OWN only. Built on the
Step-1 ``meter=`` seam + Step-3 ``meter_factory``. The factory emits a UNIFORM but VALID
proposal (REPLIES["FV42-GSV-E1"] for every call) so both projects complete — a bare
unparseable default would loop the generate fetch to BudgetExceeded instead. Both arms run
every CI, so the detach is encoded automatically (no manual reviewer-revert)."""
from portfolio_optimiser.budget import Budget, TokenMeter
from portfolio_optimiser.reference_domain import load_reference_projects
f = make_client_factory(REPLIES["FV42-GSV-E1"])
rv13 = {p.id: p for p in load_reference_projects()}["RV13-RAS-TP"]
# 1. Baseline: RV13 run standalone (its own fresh meter).
standalone = await run_project(
"RV13-RAS-TP",
"local",
docs_dir=rv13.docs_dir,
verdict_input=rv13.verdict_input,
client_factory=f,
)
# 2. Isolated (default, no meter_factory): RV13 as project 1 in the portfolio. Its usage
# equals the standalone baseline — independent of project 0. THE load-bearing assertion:
# if run_portfolio shared a meter by default, runs[1] would be cumulative and this breaks.
iso = await run_portfolio(
["FV42-GSV-E1", "RV13-RAS-TP"],
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=f,
)
assert iso.runs[1].provenance.token_usage == standalone.provenance.token_usage
# 3. Shared (injected one meter across both): usage accumulates, proving the detach is real
# (and that the == arm above would redden under sharing).
shared = TokenMeter(Budget(max_tokens=1_000_000, max_rounds=1000))
sh = await run_portfolio(
["FV42-GSV-E1", "RV13-RAS-TP"],
"local",
client_factory=f,
meter_factory=lambda: shared,
)
assert sh.runs[1].provenance.token_usage > sh.runs[0].provenance.token_usage
@pytest.mark.parametrize("profile", ["local", "azure"])
async def test_d_both_profiles_run_offline(
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store, profile
) -> None:
"""SC7: both profiles drive the portfolio contract path OFFLINE under the synthetic client
(the path is actually executed, not just the backend instantiated). Teeth: ``resolve_model``
is a profile-dependent seam reachable WITHOUT egress — each profile resolves its own
configured model from the bundled model_map.json, and local != azure (deleting the azure
entry reddens this). Honest limitation: under an injected ``client_factory``, ``profile`` is
otherwise inert inside ``run_project`` (run.py:197 stamps the injected client's own model, not
the profile's ``resolve_model``); the end-to-end run proves the path executes under both, and
``resolve_model`` is the only profile-dependent seam provable offline."""
from portfolio_optimiser.backends import resolve_model
result = await run_portfolio(
_PORTFOLIO_IDS,
profile,
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
)
assert isinstance(result, PortfolioResult)
assert len(result.runs) == 3
assert all(isinstance(r, RunResult) for r in result.runs)
# Profile-dependent teeth (offline, no egress): each profile resolves its own model.
assert resolve_model(profile, "proposer")
assert resolve_model("local", "proposer") != resolve_model("azure", "proposer")
async def test_e_new_project_flows_through_via_config_only(
make_portfolio_client_factory, fresh_store
) -> None:
"""SC1: a brand-new project (SKOLE-VVS-OPPGR) added by CONFIG ONLY — a JSON entry + a bundled
docs folder, zero ``src/*.py`` change — flows end-to-end through run_portfolio. Its id is not
in REPLIES, so the default reply (which omits project_id) inherits the new project's id via
``_parse_ir`` setdefault, proving the loader wired the config-only project through."""
result = await run_portfolio(
["SKOLE-VVS-OPPGR"],
"local",
store=fresh_store,
client_factory=make_portfolio_client_factory(REPLIES),
)
assert len(result.runs) == 1
assert result.runs[0].outcome.proposal.project_id == "SKOLE-VVS-OPPGR"
def test_f_no_hardcoded_project_ids_in_src() -> None:
"""SC1 load-bearing guard: reference-project ids live ONLY in the data JSON, never in code.
If a future project is onboarded via a code-side id->path/verdict mapping, this reddens —
backing the 'config-only' claim. Pattern: test_budget.py:88-99 (src anti-pattern grep)."""
from pathlib import Path
ids = ("FV42-GSV-E1", "RV13-RAS-TP", "BRU-LAKS-REHAB", "SKOLE-VVS-OPPGR")
offenders = [
f"{py.name}: {pid}"
for py in Path("src/portfolio_optimiser").rglob("*.py")
for pid in ids
if pid in py.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
]
assert offenders == [], f"hardcoded project ids in src: {offenders}"
def test_g_extension_doc_exists_and_references_seams() -> None:
"""SC6: the extension guide exists and names the concrete config seams a deployer extends —
the per-project config (`reference_projects.json` with `docs_dir` + `verdict_input`) and the
`model_map.json` role->deployment map. Pattern: test_budget.py:88-99 (file-content guard)."""
from pathlib import Path
doc = Path("docs/extending.md")
assert doc.exists(), "docs/extending.md is missing"
text = doc.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
for seam in ("reference_projects.json", "docs_dir", "verdict_input", "model_map.json"):
assert seam in text, f"extension doc does not reference seam: {seam}"