Kjell Tore Guttormsen
f21007c858
Session 102's criterion ((a) built on the right fasit concept OR refused anchored, (b') names it,
(c) zero hallucinations) was adjudicated BY HAND. Measured 14.09: nothing in the tree read
contexts/<set>/fasit.json against an outbox at all, so "provable against the base" had no
repeatable form. portfolio_optimiser.stress reads ONLY artefacts that already exist -- the
per-approach proposal/outcome pair and {run_id}-debate.json -- so no run gains a field.
MEASURED BEFORE BUILDING: the order defines grounded as "OPENED or CITED", but on the S2c path
run_project stamps citations = bundle_citations(bundle), one per context file. On n100-2023 that
is 446 citations over 446 concepts, and 6 of 6 fasit paths are already "cited" before a single
model call. Honouring it literally would be the repo's own vacuous-gate class inside the gate
built to catch it, so a citation grounds an approach only under a NARROWED list (a declared
pre-pass cut); both halves are reported either way. (b') was checked for the same vacuity and is
clean -- snippets are bodies, ref/title live in frontmatter (0 of 446 n100 bodies carry
"Krav 4.1.2-1") -- so the order's definition stands.
A2: unanswerable questions had no runnable form (po is not a lookup tool), so they become a FOURTH
commissioned approach per set whose cost line the base carries no ground for, and fasit.json
carries must_refuse INSTEAD of unanswerable -- one form, never two copies of one fact. Rule U is
untouched and its known-positive is still red.
Load-bearing MEASURED (20 arms), eleven mutations all red on their own arm, green control 1663/5
(from 1643/5, superset, 0 removed), golden demo-transcript.stdout BYTE-UNCHANGED
(shasum -a 1 of the CONTENT = ea8c534773acdbe41ae68f2c55724d69aaf8be4f).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
48 lines
1.9 KiB
JSON
48 lines
1.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"objective": "Kutt kostnad i utførelsesentreprisen Søråsen (veg i dagen, 3,1 km) ved å endre hvordan arbeidet beskrives etter Prosesskoden, uten å endre hva som bygges.",
|
|
"success_criteria": "Minst én tilnærming validerer, og hver validerte tilnærming peker på de prosessene i R761 som faktisk styrer utførelse og oppgjør for den posten.",
|
|
"approaches": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a1-rigg-omfang",
|
|
"label": "Redusert riggomfang og kortere riggperiode",
|
|
"description": "Rigg og drift er prissatt som rund sum over 22 måneder. Vi vil vite hva Prosesskoden legger i prosessen før vi kan kutte.",
|
|
"affected_codes": [
|
|
"12.1",
|
|
"12.12"
|
|
],
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 4200000.0,
|
|
"bundle_id": "vegnormal-r761-2025"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a2-massebalanse",
|
|
"label": "Gjenbruk av sprengstein fra linjen som filterlag i stedet for tilkjørt materiale",
|
|
"description": "Beskrivelsen har både uttak i linjen og tilkjørt filtermateriale. Spørsmålet er hva Prosesskoden krever av materialet i filterlaget.",
|
|
"affected_codes": [
|
|
"22.1",
|
|
"52.11"
|
|
],
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 6800000.0,
|
|
"bundle_id": "vegnormal-r761-2025"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a3-planum-stabilisering",
|
|
"label": "Stabilisering av planum i stedet for utskifting av undergrunn",
|
|
"description": "Undergrunnen er beskrevet utskiftet. Vi vil vite hva prosessen for stabilisering av planum omfatter.",
|
|
"affected_codes": [
|
|
"51.1"
|
|
],
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 1300000.0,
|
|
"bundle_id": "vegnormal-r761-2025"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a4-indeksregulering",
|
|
"label": "Kutt ved gunstigere indeksregulering av kontraktssummen",
|
|
"description": "Vi vil kutte ved a legge en gunstigere indeksregulering til grunn for kontraktssummen.",
|
|
"affected_codes": [
|
|
"INDEKS-01"
|
|
],
|
|
"claimed_saving_nok": 2500000.0,
|
|
"bundle_id": "vegnormal-r761-2025"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|