---
name: coord-send
description: >-
  Send an inter-repo coordination message through the local coord mailbox — a
  natural-language front door over the `coord-send` script. Use this whenever the
  user wants to notify, tell, message, ping, or coordinate with another repository
  (or all repositories) about work happening in the current repo: "send info to all
  repos", "tell repo-x the bug is fixed", "let repo Y and Z know",
  "broadcast that the spec changed", "reply to that coord message", or a
  deferred/conditional notice like "when the build is green, notify repo X". Also
  triggers on Norwegian phrasings: "send info til alle repo", "varsle repo X", "gi
  beskjed til Y og Z", "kringkast at …", "svar på coord-meldingen", "når Z er ferdig,
  varsle X". Trigger even when the user names a repo plus something to convey without
  saying "coord" explicitly — routing a message to another repo IS this skill. Also
  covers retiring a broadcast that has become wrong or obsolete: "retract that
  broadcast", "that announcement is outdated, pull it", "trekk tilbake kringkastingen",
  "den broadcasten er utdatert".
version: "0.17.0"
---

# coord-send — natural-language front door for inter-repo messages

This skill turns a plain request ("tell repo X that Y happened") into the right
`coord-send` invocation. The script is the engine; this skill is only the mapping
from intent to arguments. It never edits mailbox files by hand — always go through
the script, because the script owns the filename grammar, frontmatter, and delivery
guarantees.

## Boundary — why messages are thin

The mailbox is **transport, not state**. A coord message is a *notice*, not the
source of truth. The durable record of any decision lives in the owning repo's
state files / docs and its git history. So when you compose a body, write a
self-contained heads-up and point at where the real record lives (a commit
hash, a doc path) — don't try to make the message itself the canonical artifact.
Coordination content is also private: it never belongs on a public surface.

## The engine

    CSEND="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/coord-send.sh"

There is no deployed copy anywhere else and no fallback path. A Bash tool call
never has `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT` set as a real shell variable — only this
skill's own rendering resolves the token — so a `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$HOME/.claude}`
fallback silently won every time the line above was actually executed,
routing through whatever happened to sit at `~/.claude/scripts/coord-send.sh`
instead of the plugin's own bundled script. That path was never a legitimate
parallel deployment — the operator invokes this skill only through its
natural-language front door, never a personal terminal alias — so the file
that sat there was a pure accident target with no owner keeping it current.
It has been deleted. If this fails to resolve, the fix is this expression —
never a restored fallback.

Interface (body comes from a quoted heredoc so nothing in it is shell-expanded):

    # to one repo
    "$CSEND" --to <repo> --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
    <message body>
    BODY

    # to every repo (accumulates; first-time newcomers see it too)
    "$CSEND" --broadcast --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
    <message body>
    BODY

    # reply to a message this repo received (routes to the original sender and
    # marks the original handled; target + "Re: …" subject are inferred)
    "$CSEND" --reply-to <message-filename> <<'BODY'
    <message body>
    BODY

    # retire one of THIS repo's own broadcasts (no subject, no body)
    "$CSEND" --retract <broadcast-filename>

    # a notice that needs no answer (any of the forms above)
    "$CSEND" --to <repo> --subject "<subject>" --fyi <<'BODY'
    <message body>
    BODY

Sender identity (`--from`) defaults to the basename of the current git toplevel, so
you almost never set it. Outside a git repo there is no default — the send refuses
with exit 2 rather than naming itself after the working directory, so on a global
surface (`~/repos`, `$HOME`) pass `--from <repo>` and make the identity a choice.
Exit 0 = delivered; exit 2 = usage/IO error (read stderr and fix the arguments
rather than retrying blindly).

## Does it need an answer? (`--fyi`)

Every message declares whether its sender expects a reply. **Omitting `--fyi` is
the declaration that one is expected** — that is the default, and it is the safe
one: a forgotten flag over-counts what the recipient owes, which is visible,
while the opposite would create debt nobody ever sees.

Pass `--fyi` when the message is genuinely a notice: "shipped 0.9.0", "the spec
moved to docs/x.md", "your build is green again". Omit it when you are asking a
question, requesting a decision, or handing over work — anything where silence
would leave *you* blocked.

Two things this flag is not:

- **Not a way to lower the bar for the recipient.** Both terminal states stay
  open on every message: a `--fyi` message must still be closed with
  `coord-done`, and the recipient may still reply. The field says what *you*
  expect, and the receiving session is told in as many words that it is a
  declaration, not an instruction.
- **Not available on a broadcast.** `--broadcast` always writes
  `reply-expected: no`, `--fyi` or not, because there is no reply path to a
  broadcast at all (`--reply-to` resolves inside the recipient's own mailbox).
  Passing it there is harmless and changes nothing.

A reply is not a special case either: `--reply-to` without `--fyi` expects one
back. When your reply closes the exchange — and it usually does — say so with
`--fyi` rather than leaving the other repo an open item.

## Choosing the target

- **One named repo** → `--to <repo>`. The repo name is its directory basename; use
  the name the user gave. No registration exists — sending to a new name just creates
  that repo's inbox, so a typo silently creates a dead mailbox. If unsure a name is
  real, check `~/repos/` or existing `~/.claude/coord/<repo>/` before sending.
- **Several named repos** ("X and Y") → loop `--to` once per repo with the same
  subject and body. There is no multi-target flag; the loop is the mechanism:

      for repo in repo-x repo-y; do
        "$CSEND" --to "$repo" --subject "<subject>" <<'BODY'
      <body>
      BODY
      done

- **All repos** → `--broadcast`. Prefer this only when the notice genuinely concerns
  everyone, because broadcasts accumulate and every future first-time repo sees the
  standing backlog. For a bounded, known set, loop `--to` instead so unrelated future
  repos don't inherit it. A broadcast that later turns out wrong can be retired with
  `--retract` (see below), but only for repos that have not received it yet.
- **A reply to something received** → `--reply-to <filename>`. Use the filename from
  the injected inbox/archive; it resolves the sender and closes the original in one
  step.

## Retracting a broadcast

When a broadcast has become wrong or obsolete, retire it — don't send a correction
and leave the original standing, because every future first-time repo would receive
both. `--retract <broadcast-filename>` archives it out of the delivery queue.

Three things to be honest about when you report it:

- **It is un-send, not recall.** Repos that already received the broadcast keep it.
  Retraction only stops delivery to repos that haven't seen it yet. If the old news
  actively misleads someone who already got it, a correcting broadcast is still
  needed — retraction alone does not reach them.
- **Only the sender may retract.** The `from:` field must match this repo's identity.
  If the announcing repo has since been renamed, its old identity no longer resolves,
  so pass `--from <old-sender>` explicitly (read the sender off the file). Say that
  you did.
- **Nothing is deleted.** The message moves to `_broadcast/archive/`. Never remove a
  mailbox file by hand — the script owns the filename grammar and delivery guarantees.

Find the filename in `~/.claude/coord/_broadcast/inbox/` (or from the injected
`--- broadcast: <filename> ---` line) rather than guessing it.

## Composing the message

Derive a short, specific `--subject` from the intent if the user didn't give one
("ingest bug fixed", not "update"). In the body, state what happened, what the
recipient should know or do, and a pointer to the durable record (commit hash, doc
path). Keep it to the point — this is a notice, not a report. Match the repo's
language convention for message content; keep it sober and factual.

## Deferred and conditional sends

"When Z is done, notify X" means: do **not** send now. Hold the intent — the target,
subject, and body — and continue the work. The moment condition Z is satisfied *in
this session*, fire the send. This works because you carry the intent across turns
within a session.

Be honest about the limit: a skill cannot persist intent across sessions. If the
session is ending and the condition still hasn't been met, surface the pending
message to the user so it isn't silently lost — don't imply it will fire later on
its own.

## After sending

Report what actually happened: the target(s), the subject, and the delivered
filename(s) from the script's stdout. If a send failed (exit 2), say so with the
stderr reason rather than claiming success. Delivery reaches the recipient at *their*
next session start (the receive side is a hook), so tell the user it's queued, not
that the other repo has seen it.

## Examples

**Example 1 — single repo, composed body**
Input: "tell repo-x the ingest bug is fixed, it was commit abc1234"
Action: `--to repo-x --subject "ingest bug fixed"`, body naming the fix and
pointing at commit abc1234 and the owning doc.

**Example 2 — broadcast**
Input: "let all the repos know the shared spec grew a new validation rule"
Action: `--broadcast --subject "spec: new validation rule"`, body summarizing
the change and pointing at the spec's owning repo.

**Example 3 — bounded multi-target**
Input: "gi beskjed til repo-x og repo-y om at gaten er re-pinnet"
Action: loop `--to repo-x` then `--to repo-y`, same subject "shared gate re-pinned".

**Example 4 — deferred**
Input: "når testene er grønne, varsle repo-y"
Action: keep working; once the test run passes this session, send
`--to repo-y` with the green result. If the session ends first, surface the
pending notice to the user.

**Example 5 — reply**
Input: "svar på coord-meldingen fra repo-x at vi tar det"
Action: `--reply-to <that-message-filename>`, body acknowledging and stating the plan.

**Example 6 — retract**
Input: "den gamle kringkastingen om plugin-navnet er utdatert, trekk den"
Action: locate the file in `_broadcast/inbox/`, then `--retract <that-filename>`
(adding `--from <old-sender>` if this repo has been renamed since). Report that
repos which already received it are unaffected.