repo-mailbox/scripts/route.sh

#!/bin/bash
# route.sh - score four traits of the NEXT task, get the model and effort to
# run it with. A pure calculator: reads nothing, writes nothing, prints one
# block of key=value lines on stdout. The session pastes the result into
# STATE.md; this script never touches a file.
#
# WHY THIS EXISTS. The board line's next-cost field had a reader (board.sh)
# and no writer, so its value was typed by hand every session and drifted into
# several competing spellings. Cleaning the data could not fix that.
# A writer with a CLOSED output range can: this script can only ever emit one
# of six strings, so a seventh cannot enter circulation.
#
# THE ROW TABLE IS THE POLICY, and it is the operator's rubric verbatim -
# moved here so there is one copy rather than one per repo:
#
#   1  Sonnet 5/high    reading, summarizing, docs, mechanical refactor
#   2  Sonnet 5/xhigh   TDD cycle, known-root-cause bugfix, one-file change
#   3  Opus 5/high      multi-file feature, architecture choice, hard debugging
#   4  Opus 5/xhigh     long autonomous run, big refactor, cross-repo migration
#   5  Fable 5/high     Opus 5/xhigh has ACTUALLY failed on this same step
#   6  Fable 5/xhigh    open problem, no known solution path, longest horizon
#
# Cheapest first, so the rubric's "always name one row cheaper as the quota
# fallback" is row minus one, floored at row 1, correct by construction.
#
# THE TRAITS describe the task, never how it feels. "Hard", "complex" and
# "important" are deliberately absent: they are unfalsifiable and collapse to
# a hunch, which is the thing being replaced.
#
#   --path           known | partial | undetermined
#                    Is the solution route described, or must it be found?
#   --verification   strong | weak | none
#                    Will tests, types or a compiler catch the error?
#   --reversibility  cheap | costly | one-way
#   --scope          local | multi-file | cross-cutting
#   --rationale      required free text - WHY these four scores
#
# All five are required. None has a default, and that is load-bearing:
# verification carries the most signal and is the trait most often left out,
# and a default would be indistinguishable from a real score when the log is
# read back to find out whether the ROUTING was wrong or the SCORING was.
#
# SELECTION - first match wins, most expensive first:
#   row 6  history says Opus 5/xhigh failed here, and path=undetermined
#   row 5  history says Opus 5/xhigh failed here
#   row 4  reversibility=one-way OR scope=cross-cutting
#   row 3  path=partial|undetermined OR reversibility=costly OR scope=multi-file
#   row 2  verification=weak|none
#   row 1  otherwise
#
# Escalation is ASYMMETRIC on purpose: any single trait escalates, while
# reaching row 1 needs all four at the cheap end. Underkill costs one session,
# overkill costs quota every session - but a wrong architecture decision in a
# published plugin costs more than either.
#
# WHERE IT DISAGREES WITH THE RUBRIC'S EXAMPLES. The rows are task-type labels;
# the traits are a different classification over the same six outcomes. They
# part company by one row on the two cheapest rows - documentation scores
# known/none/cheap/local and lands on row 2 where the rubric's prose says row
# 1; a TDD cycle scores known/strong/cheap/local and lands on row 1 where the
# prose says row 2. This is left alone deliberately. Chasing the example
# phrases would mean re-implementing description-matching, which is the guess
# the traits exist to replace. It is a policy, not a theorem: --rationale is
# how a misscore is found afterwards.
#
# THE SPECIFICATION CHECK THAT COMES FREE. path=undetermined with no planned
# design phase means the TASK DESCRIPTION is underspecified - not that the
# model should be upgraded. Rewrite the next step; upgrading the model to
# compensate for a vague spec is the most expensive form of procrastination
# available.
#
# Usage:
#   route.sh --path <v> --verification <v> --reversibility <v> --scope <v>
#            --rationale <text> [--opus-xhigh-failed]
#
#   route.sh ... --last-model <Sonnet 5|Opus 5|Fable 5>
#                --last-effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>
#                --last-completed <yes|no> --last-corrections <n>
#
# --opus-xhigh-failed is the ONLY way rows 5 and 6 can fire, and it means one
# narrow thing: an Opus 5/xhigh session already ran at THIS SAME next step and
# did not complete it. Not "a session failed" - context exhaustion, an operator
# interrupt or a block on another repo are not this flag. It escalates to a
# model that runs without an advisor, so when in doubt, leave it off.
#
# THE LAST-SESSION RECORD (the four --last-* fields, all or none) is what makes
# any of this falsifiable. It records how the session that just ran actually
# went, so the policy can later be judged against outcomes instead of against
# how sensible it reads. --last-corrections is the cheap proxy: systematically
# high counts on row 1 mean the cheap row is too easy to reach, systematically
# zero on row 4 means escalation fires too readily.
#
# All four fields are closed sets or numbers, and required together, because the
# NEXT session reads the record back to decide --opus-xhigh-failed. Note what
# the caller must supply rather than infer: the effort a session ran with is not
# observable from inside that session, and reading it back off the previous
# board line would measure what was PRESCRIBED, not what was RUN. Omit the
# record rather than guess - a guessed value reads back as a measurement.
#
# It is deliberately NOT wired to the Fable rows. Inferring "the model failed"
# from "the session did not finish" would fire on context exhaustion and on
# operator interrupts, which say nothing about the model. The record is
# evidence; --opus-xhigh-failed is a judgement. Keeping them apart is why the
# evidence stays worth reading.
#
# Exit 0 on a decision, 2 on any bad or missing argument. ASCII only,
# bash 3.2 safe.
set -u
export LC_ALL=C

PATH_T=""; VERIF=""; REVERS=""; SCOPE=""; RATIONALE=""; RAT_SET=0; FAILED=0
L_MODEL=""; L_EFFORT=""; L_DONE=""; L_CORR=""; L_SET=0

die() { echo "route: $1" >&2; exit 2; }

need() { [ $# -ge 2 ] || die "$1 requires a value"; }

while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
  case "$1" in
    # bash 3.2: `shift 2` past the end of $# is a no-op -> would loop forever.
    --path)          need "$@"; PATH_T="$2"; shift 2 ;;
    --verification)  need "$@"; VERIF="$2"; shift 2 ;;
    --reversibility) need "$@"; REVERS="$2"; shift 2 ;;
    --scope)         need "$@"; SCOPE="$2"; shift 2 ;;
    --rationale)     need "$@"; RATIONALE="$2"; RAT_SET=1; shift 2 ;;
    --opus-xhigh-failed) FAILED=1; shift ;;
    --last-model)       need "$@"; L_MODEL="$2"; L_SET=1; shift 2 ;;
    --last-effort)      need "$@"; L_EFFORT="$2"; L_SET=1; shift 2 ;;
    --last-completed)   need "$@"; L_DONE="$2"; L_SET=1; shift 2 ;;
    --last-corrections) need "$@"; L_CORR="$2"; L_SET=1; shift 2 ;;
    -h|--help) grep '^#' "$0" | sed 's/^# \{0,1\}//'; exit 0 ;;
    *) die "unknown argument: $1" ;;
  esac
done

# Unknown values are rejected rather than tolerated. A silently accepted
# typo would route on three traits and look exactly like a scored decision.
case "$PATH_T" in
  known|partial|undetermined) ;;
  "") die "--path is required (known|partial|undetermined)" ;;
  *)  die "--path: unknown value '$PATH_T' (known|partial|undetermined)" ;;
esac
case "$VERIF" in
  strong|weak|none) ;;
  "") die "--verification is required (strong|weak|none)" ;;
  *)  die "--verification: unknown value '$VERIF' (strong|weak|none)" ;;
esac
case "$REVERS" in
  cheap|costly|one-way) ;;
  "") die "--reversibility is required (cheap|costly|one-way)" ;;
  *)  die "--reversibility: unknown value '$REVERS' (cheap|costly|one-way)" ;;
esac
case "$SCOPE" in
  local|multi-file|cross-cutting) ;;
  "") die "--scope is required (local|multi-file|cross-cutting)" ;;
  *)  die "--scope: unknown value '$SCOPE' (local|multi-file|cross-cutting)" ;;
esac
[ "$RAT_SET" -eq 1 ] || die "--rationale is required (why these four scores)"
[ -n "$RATIONALE" ] || die "--rationale must not be empty"

# The last-session record is all four fields or none at all. A partial record
# emits an empty value that reads back later exactly like a measured one, and
# the whole purpose of the record is to be readable evidence months from now.
if [ "$L_SET" -eq 1 ]; then
  [ -n "$L_MODEL" ]  || die "--last-model is required with a last-session record"
  [ -n "$L_EFFORT" ] || die "--last-effort is required with a last-session record"
  [ -n "$L_DONE" ]   || die "--last-completed is required with a last-session record"
  [ -n "$L_CORR" ]   || die "--last-corrections is required with a last-session record"
  # Model and effort are closed sets here, not free text. The next session READS
  # this record back to decide --opus-xhigh-failed, so a drifted spelling
  # ("opus 5" for "Opus 5") rebuilds the reader-versus-writer drift this whole
  # script exists to remove, one field over.
  case "$L_MODEL" in
    "Sonnet 5"|"Opus 5"|"Fable 5") ;;
    *) die "--last-model: '$L_MODEL' is not a row-table model (Sonnet 5|Opus 5|Fable 5)" ;;
  esac
  case "$L_EFFORT" in
    low|medium|high|xhigh|max) ;;
    *) die "--last-effort: '$L_EFFORT' is not a verified effort level (low|medium|high|xhigh|max)" ;;
  esac
  case "$L_DONE" in
    yes|no) ;;
    *) die "--last-completed: unknown value '$L_DONE' (yes|no)" ;;
  esac
  case "$L_CORR" in
    ""|*[!0-9]*) die "--last-corrections must be a whole number, got '$L_CORR'" ;;
  esac
fi

# --- Selection: first match wins, most expensive first ---------------------
if   [ "$FAILED" -eq 1 ] && [ "$PATH_T" = "undetermined" ]; then
  ROW=6; RULE="opus-xhigh-failed + path=undetermined"
elif [ "$FAILED" -eq 1 ]; then
  ROW=5; RULE="opus-xhigh-failed"
elif [ "$REVERS" = "one-way" ]; then
  ROW=4; RULE="reversibility=one-way"
elif [ "$SCOPE" = "cross-cutting" ]; then
  ROW=4; RULE="scope=cross-cutting"
elif [ "$PATH_T" != "known" ]; then
  ROW=3; RULE="path=$PATH_T"
elif [ "$REVERS" = "costly" ]; then
  ROW=3; RULE="reversibility=costly"
elif [ "$SCOPE" = "multi-file" ]; then
  ROW=3; RULE="scope=multi-file"
elif [ "$VERIF" != "strong" ]; then
  ROW=2; RULE="verification=$VERIF"
else
  ROW=1; RULE="no escalating trait (all four at the cheap end)"
fi

# --- The row table: one decision, two spellings ---------------------------
# The rubric name goes in the board line so repos compare by eye; the CLI alias
# goes in the command the operator pastes. Emitting both from one table is the
# point - two hand-maintained spellings of one decision is how they disagree.
# Aliases are gated against the installed claude by route-selftest.sh section
# 11, never assumed here.
row_name() {
  case "$1" in
    1) echo "Sonnet 5/high" ;;  2) echo "Sonnet 5/xhigh" ;;
    3) echo "Opus 5/high" ;;    4) echo "Opus 5/xhigh" ;;
    5) echo "Fable 5/high" ;;   6) echo "Fable 5/xhigh" ;;
  esac
}
row_cmd() {
  case "$1" in
    1) echo "claude --model sonnet --effort high" ;;
    2) echo "claude --model sonnet --effort xhigh" ;;
    3) echo "claude --model opus --effort high" ;;
    4) echo "claude --model opus --effort xhigh" ;;
    5) echo "claude --model fable --effort high" ;;
    6) echo "claude --model fable --effort xhigh" ;;
  esac
}

FB=$((ROW - 1)); [ "$FB" -ge 1 ] || FB=1

# The rationale is free text from a session and lands inside an HTML comment on
# ONE line. A newline would split the line and hand the remainder to board.sh's
# NESTE extractor as the repo's next step; a literal '-->' would close the
# comment early and spill the rest into the rendered STATE.md. Same
# line-oriented sanitizing the send side applies to its own fields.
RAT_CLEAN="$(printf '%s' "$RATIONALE" | tr '\r\n' '  ' | tr -d '\000-\037' \
             | sed 's/-->/-- >/g')"

# rationale goes LAST in the line: it is the only field that may contain a
# ';', so anything after it would be unparseable.
echo "row=$ROW"
echo "rule=$RULE"
echo "next-cost=$(row_name "$ROW")"
echo "command=$(row_cmd "$ROW")"
echo "fallback=$(row_name "$FB")"
echo "fallback-command=$(row_cmd "$FB")"
echo "route-line=<!-- route: path=$PATH_T; verification=$VERIF; reversibility=$REVERS; scope=$SCOPE; rationale=$RAT_CLEAN -->"
# No sanitizing needed on the record: all four fields are validated against
# closed sets above, so none of them can carry a newline or a '-->'.
if [ "$L_SET" -eq 1 ]; then
  echo "route-last=<!-- route-last: model=$L_MODEL; effort=$L_EFFORT; completed=$L_DONE; corrections=$L_CORR -->"
fi
exit 0