Kjell Tore Guttormsen
d0a5ffe515
Replaces the weighted score shipped in 0.19.0 with five lookups: chain-root credit, unhandled inbox, planned, in-progress, undeclared status. Within a group: that group's own quantity, then a Sonnet next-cost, then oldest plan. The score's objection is accepted, not forgotten, and is written into board.sh and CLAUDE.md so a later session reads it as decided rather than as an unfixed defect: a group order cannot express "owes one message AND releases two others" as one quantity. What the score could not do was hold still for the format's second consumer - re-tuning one weight against another silently reorders a parser in another repo, and no test here can catch that. planned now ranks above in-progress, inverted by the same decision: converting a decision into motion is the slow step; live work is already moving. Debt stays uncapped and never excluded. One group below chain-root credit is not the cap declined at 0.19.0 - the debtor keeps its tab, its most-owed-first position, and its why=inbox:N. Pinned by a discriminating fixture the score would fail: a root releasing one repo outranks a repo owing four. board-selftest 134 -> 138. Suite 183 + 138 + 73 = 394. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y6ULuFCPMNYAPNN3pAjsXQ
12 lines
193 B
JSON
12 lines
193 B
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "repo-mailbox",
|
|
"version": "0.20.0",
|
|
"private": true,
|
|
"type": "module",
|
|
"engines": {
|
|
"node": ">=18"
|
|
},
|
|
"scripts": {
|
|
"test": "node --test tests/*.test.mjs"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|