Kjell Tore Guttormsen
f422b63bb3
Gated on `findings.length === 0`, so a TAG-SIGNED-PREPOLICY OK silenced it — and every repo in the org has pre-policy tags, which made the affirmative verdict near-unreachable in practice. Caught by dogfooding v0.11.0: this repo signed the first tag the check ever judged, and the gate did not say so. Status was green either way, which is exactly why it was worth fixing — a reader could not tell "signed its new tag" from "has cut no tag since the policy". Two different facts wearing one silence, which is the defect this engine already refuses to ship one check over, where an exemption nobody can see reads like a check that stopped running. Keys the affirmative on the JUDGED findings only. Measured after: 18 repos emit both codes, 3 NONE, still 0 ERROR / 0 WARN. 243 tests, from 241. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XsPsVsvhrSaejK3cLPmnN2
12 lines
479 B
JSON
12 lines
479 B
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "repo-standard",
|
|
"version": "0.11.1",
|
|
"description": "Per-repo gate for the open/ presentation standard: README first screen, install block, files required by the repo's class, and dead repo references.",
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"name": "Kjell Tore Guttormsen"
|
|
},
|
|
"auto_discover": true,
|
|
"license": "MIT",
|
|
"repository": "https://git.fromaitochitta.com/open/repo-standard",
|
|
"keywords": ["repository-standard", "readme", "gate", "documentation", "multi-repo"]
|
|
}
|