fix(review): the coordinator gets the brief's choices and writes the brief-conflict mark

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

commands/trekreview.md

@@ -480,6 +480,15 @@ from Phase 5 AND the Phase 4.7 engine payloads, plus the triage map, brief
 metadata, SHA range, the expected reviewer set (engines included), and each
 not-run engine with its reason.
 
+**Brief choices.** Next to the brief metadata, pass the brief's choices
+verbatim: extract the `## Non-Goals`, `## Constraints` and `## Preferences`
+sections and the operator decisions in `## Open Questions / Assumptions` from
+the brief, word for word (a section the brief does not carry is passed as
+absent, never written for it). The coordinator reads them for the
+brief-conflict rule only (`agents/review-coordinator.md` Pass 3): an engine
+finding whose recommended action contradicts one of them is kept and marked
+`contradicts_brief`, never removed.
+
 The coordinator runs the 4-pass process documented in
 `agents/review-coordinator.md`:
 
@@ -552,7 +561,11 @@ Contract (verified in S10 part B — follow exactly):
 
 Then continue at **Phase 7** exactly as the prose path does — Phase 7 rendering, Phase 8
 validation, and the operator gate are **shared** and substrate-independent (both paths
-return the same `{verdict, findings}` shape).
+return the same `{verdict, findings}` shape). The workflow's returned findings keep
+`engine` (set by the script from the payload a finding came from, never from a label),
+`contradicts_brief` and `brief_lowered_from`, and Phase 7 writes them into each
+finding's field list and the trailing JSON block of review.md exactly as the prose path
+does.
 
 **Known limitation (per bake-off §Posture, surfaced not hidden).** Classifier interference
 was measured **0** at 9-agent concurrency in the session's default permission mode; an