release(v5.10.1): drop gemini-bridge from the pipeline; correct the T1 §6 PoC status
gemini-bridge is dropped by operator directive (three repetitions). The drop is permanent, not a wait-for-SDK-upgrade state, so the change clears every LIVE surface that could still steer a run toward the agent and leaves the historical record alone. Live surfaces cleared: agents/gemini-bridge.md deleted; trekresearch (bridge launch block, --local help, high-effort always-on pair, stats record, degradation list), trekplan, trekbrief, research-orchestrator (mode table, agent table, prompting block, summary line), README (feature prose, mode table, agent prose, mermaid EXTERNAL node, conditional legend, optional-MCP requirement, --local section), CLAUDE.md, settings.json (the whole trekresearch.geminiBridge block), both templates, architecture.md, command-modes.md. trekplan high-effort Adversarial Pass 2 now degrades EXPLICITLY: it emits its section with status "unavailable, skipped" instead of failing or vanishing. A high-effort plan carrying no Pass 2 marker is indistinguishable from one whose Pass 2 crashed, which is the failure mode this wording exists to prevent. gemini_used is deliberately KEPT as a vestigial trekresearch stats field pinned to false. Removing it would break the observability export schema for existing consumers, and the directive was about the agent, not the field. Not touched: CHANGELOG history and the measurement/decision docs keep their gemini references. They record what a past version did or what was measured then; rewriting them is the same defect class as bumping a version string inside a measurement doc. Driven test-first. Five new pins in tests/lib/doc-consistency.test.mjs, verified RED before the edits, including a KNOWN-POSITIVE CONTROL asserting the historical records still DO carry gemini references — so the empty result on live surfaces is a measurement and not a broken query (Verifiseringsloven ansikt 4). Agent inventory 24 -> 23 (20 spawnable + 3 orchestrator reference docs); the <example>-block floor moves 34 -> 32 because an agent legitimately left the inventory, not because examples went missing from a surviving one. Docs: docs/T1-cc26-delegated-orchestration.md §8 item 3 claimed both the §6 synthesis-agent PoC and the §5 bake-off were "designed but unbuilt". That was written in S7 and falsified the same afternoon by S12, which ran the §6 PoC and recorded Δ main-context (faithful flow) = 0.0%, NEGATIVE. The stale wording is what caused the settled PoC to be re-ordered as new work on 2026-09-02, so it is struck rather than deleted and §6 gained a RUN AND DECLINED status block. The finding is structural, not stochastic: Phase 5 spawns the exploration swarm foreground (trekplan.md:158,338-341), so the outputs are already resident in main before Phase 7 — delegating only the Phase-7 digest evicts nothing. Also measured 2026-09-03 (CC 2.1.259): claude -p --output-format stream-json runs on subscription auth with no ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and now emits a subagent_stats block, so S12's environment-block premise is half stale. Recorded in §8 item 4. It lowers the cost of §5; it changes nothing about §6. Suite 1041 (1039/0/2), up from 1036 by exactly the five tests added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
20cdc22803
commit
1ca48e0cd0
19 changed files with 261 additions and 249 deletions
|
|
@ -74,15 +74,6 @@ findings exist.*
|
|||
### Known Issues
|
||||
{Common pitfalls, gotchas, real-world problems from community-researcher}
|
||||
|
||||
## Gemini Second Opinion
|
||||
|
||||
*Independent research result from Gemini Deep Research. Provides a second
|
||||
perspective for triangulation. Omit this section if gemini-bridge was not used
|
||||
or was unavailable.*
|
||||
|
||||
{Gemini findings reformatted into key findings, sources cited, and areas of
|
||||
agreement/disagreement with other agents.}
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
*Cross-cutting insights that emerge from combining local and external knowledge.
|
||||
|
|
@ -114,7 +105,7 @@ this section entirely.*
|
|||
|
||||
| # | Source | Type | Quality | Used in |
|
||||
|---|--------|------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| 1 | {URL or codebase path} | {official / community / codebase / gemini} | {high / medium / low} | {dimension name} |
|
||||
| 1 | {URL or codebase path} | {official / community / codebase} | {high / medium / low} | {dimension name} |
|
||||
|
||||
*Quality assessment:*
|
||||
- **high** — official documentation, verified codebase analysis, peer-reviewed
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ the codebase and this brief contain sufficient context for planning."}
|
|||
- **Required for plan steps:** {which kinds of steps will consume this — e.g.,
|
||||
"migration strategy", "library selection", "threat model"}
|
||||
- **Confidence needed:** {high | medium | low}
|
||||
- **Estimated cost:** {quick — inline research | standard — agent swarm | deep — with contrarian + gemini}
|
||||
- **Estimated cost:** {quick — inline research | standard — agent swarm | deep — with contrarian}
|
||||
- **Scope hint:** {local | external | both}
|
||||
|
||||
### Topic 2: {Short title}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue