docs(tests): tracked comments name the measurement, not the coordination
`origin` is a public mirror. Comments in tracked test files named the internal
review mechanism by its role rather than the measurement they came from; the
same class as the frozen file's overclaim fixed in 83d82f1. Replaced with what
they actually are: a re-measurement on a named commit, with the date.
The one remaining occurrence is the assertion that FORBIDS those phrases in
tests/fixtures/end-state-frozen.json - a guard has to spell out what it guards.
Suite 1161 (1159/0/2). Comment-only change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f90e1cf02d
commit
3b3f06dd45
3 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ const ROOT = resolve(dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), '..', '..');
|
|||
const GATE = join(ROOT, 'scripts', 'end-state-gate.mjs');
|
||||
|
||||
// --- the frozen denominator ------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Denominator frozen 2026-09-17 by the end-state work order, the day the end-state
|
||||
// Denominator frozen 2026-09-17, the day the end-state
|
||||
// direction was chosen. An entry may CLOSE; it may never be removed or have its check
|
||||
// changed, and the gate's agent/decision/freeze configuration may not move. To change
|
||||
// anything below you must change this test — say in the commit message who decided it.
|
||||
|
|
@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ test('the detail line carries one note per probe kind PRESENT, and none for kind
|
|||
|
||||
// --- a probe that RUNS a test, and the M6 mutant ---------------------------
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Measured 2026-09-18 (PM checkpoint on 6cafb4c): a two-line file
|
||||
// Measured 2026-09-18 (re-measured on 6cafb4c): a two-line file
|
||||
// export function runPlanVerification() { return { ok: true }; }
|
||||
// export function formatCriteriaEvidence() { return ''; }
|
||||
// dropped into an otherwise UNFIXED tree closed both D-03 and D-04, and the
|
||||
|
|
@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ test('the gate states out loud that the wiring is pinned by text, not proven', (
|
|||
|
||||
// --- M7: a probe must bind the test's CONTENT, not its name ---------------
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Measured 2026-09-18 (PM checkpoint on e1e7bdf): the cosmetic close came back
|
||||
// Measured 2026-09-18 (re-measured on e1e7bdf): the cosmetic close came back
|
||||
// one level up. The probe reads the test file from the SAME tree it measures,
|
||||
// so a four-line file holding two EMPTY tests with the two named names —
|
||||
// test('runPlanVerification: a plan whose success criterion FAILS fells the run', () => {});
|
||||
|
|
@ -937,10 +937,10 @@ test('the stub mutant leaves the measured tree untouched', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('the frozen file claims no authority it does not have', () => {
|
||||
// MINOR from the same checkpoint: the tracked frozen file said the second
|
||||
// amendment was "operator-authorised by work order". No operator authorised
|
||||
// it; it followed from a maintenance decision. A file whose whole job is to
|
||||
// be an explicit decision trail may not overclaim in either direction.
|
||||
// Measured the same day: the tracked frozen file claimed its second
|
||||
// amendment was operator-authorised. No operator authorised it; it followed
|
||||
// from a maintenance decision. A file whose whole job is to be an explicit
|
||||
// decision trail may not overclaim in either direction.
|
||||
const why = loadFrozen(ROOT).why;
|
||||
assert.ok(why.length > 0, 'the frozen manifest must say WHY it changed');
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue