open/voyage
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 5 Activity

docs(intent): M3 + M7 — the header says only what is true

Browse source 
M3: the header claimed "reflowing a paragraph keeps the approval"; joining
lines gives STALE (PM probe iii-c). It now says what keeps the approval
(indentation, in-line spacing, blank lines, CRLF) and that joining or
splitting lines makes it stale — erring safe. Also states the one-section
and code-block/comment rules from M1.
M7: the trekreview exemption is read from the brief's own frontmatter, so a
relabelled brief walks past the gate — the same trust class as self-stamping.
Now said in the module header, HANDOVER-CONTRACTS and /trekplan's gate prose.
HANDOVER-CONTRACTS also names both brief modes the --approve path reaches.

Red 097bae8 (M3, M7) → green. Suite 1224: 1222 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-09-23 09:24:16 +02:00
commit 4592b40873
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
3 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/HANDOVER-CONTRACTS.md
View file

@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Optional but standard sections: `## Non-Goals`, `## Constraints`, `## Preference
**Pre-2.2 briefs receive zero framing enforcement (producer-elective defense).** The framing-alignment defense is gated at `brief_version ≥ 2.2`, so a brief declaring `2.0` or `2.1` gets **none** of it: `framing` is optional and a missing value is not an error, the `## TL;DR` section is not required, and the `brief-reviewer` memory-alignment dimension scores N/A. The backward-compatibility this buys is deliberate, but it also means the framing defense is **producer-elective**: any producer can sidestep the entire defense — deliberately or by shipping a legacy template — simply by declaring `brief_version: "2.1"`, and the pipeline raises no signal by default. This is a documented property of the contract, not a bug. Two remedies close it for a given consumer: (1) require upstream producers to emit `brief_version: "2.2"` (which forces `framing` + `## TL;DR`); or (2) pass the opt-in **`--min-brief-version <ver>`** flag to `/trekplan` or `/trekresearch` (forwarded to the validator as `--min-version`), which raises a `BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM` **warning** — never a block — when a brief declares a version below the floor. The flag defaults to off, so the N-1 compatibility window for `2.0`/`2.1` briefs is preserved unless a consumer explicitly opts into the stricter floor.
**Intent approval gate (veikart steg 1) — additive schema, consumer-side requirement.** The two `intent_approved_*` fields are additive and optional in the schema: `brief-validator.mjs` does not require them, `/trekresearch` does not read them, and no `brief_version` bump is involved. The requirement lives in `/trekplan` Phase 1 (`### Read the brief`), which runs `intent-approval.mjs --check` and **halts** on `BRIEF_INTENT_NOT_APPROVED` (no marker), `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_STALE` (`## Intent` or `## Goal` changed after approval) or `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_INVALID` (malformed marker, or a section missing). It is version-independent, so a brief from ANY producer, of any `brief_version`, stops at `/trekplan` until approved. No producer has to emit anything new: the operator approves through `/trekbrief --approve <project-dir | brief-file>`, a Voyage-side step open to every producer's brief, so no producer is privileged. `trekreview` briefs are exempt. **What the marker does not prove:** same user, same machine. Any session can run `--stamp`. The marker is a trace that the approval step ran against this exact text, not a signature (see the header of `lib/validators/intent-approval.mjs`). `--stamp` also emits `brief-approved` to `trekexecute-stats.jsonl` under `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA`, falling back to the plugin data dir the yardstick reads, on both the manual and the auto path.
**Intent approval gate (veikart steg 1) — additive schema, consumer-side requirement.** The two `intent_approved_*` fields are additive and optional in the schema: `brief-validator.mjs` does not require them, `/trekresearch` does not read them, and no `brief_version` bump is involved. The requirement lives in `/trekplan` Phase 1 (`### Read the brief`), which runs `intent-approval.mjs --check` and **halts** on `BRIEF_INTENT_NOT_APPROVED` (no marker), `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_STALE` (`## Intent` or `## Goal` changed after approval) or `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_INVALID` (malformed marker, or a section missing, empty or present more than once; a `## ` line inside a code block or HTML comment is not a heading). It is version-independent, so a brief from ANY producer, of any `brief_version`, stops at `/trekplan` until approved. No producer has to emit anything new: the operator approves through `/trekbrief --approve <project-dir | brief-file>`, a Voyage-side step open to every producer's brief, whether it is planned with `--project` (`<dir>/brief.md`) or `--brief <file>`, so no producer is privileged. `trekreview` briefs are exempt. The exemption is read from the brief's own frontmatter, so relabelling a brief `type: trekreview` walks past the gate, the same trust class as self-stamping. **What the marker does not prove:** same user, same machine. Any session can run `--stamp`. The marker is a trace that the approval step ran against this exact text, not a signature (see the header of `lib/validators/intent-approval.mjs`). `--stamp` also emits `brief-approved` to `trekexecute-stats.jsonl` under `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA`, falling back to the plugin data dir the yardstick reads, on both the manual and the auto path.
**Failure modes:**
- `BRIEF_INTENT_NOT_APPROVED` / `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_STALE` / `BRIEF_INTENT_APPROVAL_INVALID` → `/trekplan` halts (intent-approval gate, above); remedy `/trekbrief --approve <project-dir | brief-file>`