fix(execute): the final report says whether the app was seen with Claude Code's run
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
050a77f513
commit
6226372eaa
3 changed files with 51 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -2140,6 +2140,11 @@ built thing — not in the run. (A ≥ 1.8 plan cannot reach here with its
|
|||
`End-to-end:` command missing from `## Verification`: the plan validator
|
||||
rejects that as `PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_VERIFIED`.)
|
||||
|
||||
Record `run_seen`: `yes` when the app was seen and driven with Claude Code's
|
||||
built-in `run` in this run, else `no — {reason}` (no app to launch, `run` not
|
||||
available, not started, and why). The verdict is still the `End-to-end:`
|
||||
command.
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture rules (K5) and the plan-file sweep (K6)
|
||||
|
||||
Two whole-run checks, for a trekplan and a session spec alike, in one Bash
|
||||
|
|
@ -2808,6 +2813,7 @@ Phase 2.3 (validate exit) and Phase 5 (dry-run) intentionally do not write
|
|||
**Mode:** {execute | resume | step N}
|
||||
**Result:** {COMPLETED | FAILED at step N | STOPPED (escalation) | PARTIAL (N/total passed)}
|
||||
**End to end:** {verified | not verified end to end}
|
||||
**Seen with `run`:** {yes | no — {reason}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Step Results
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -2933,6 +2939,7 @@ To continue (multi-session waves): re-run the same /trekexecute command (not --r
|
|||
"legacy_plan": false,
|
||||
"progress_file": "{path}",
|
||||
"end_to_end": "{verified | not-verified | n/a}",
|
||||
"run_seen": "{yes | no — reason}",
|
||||
"steps_without_red_proof": 0,
|
||||
"stop_class": "{none | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4}",
|
||||
"decisions": 0,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue